Nice analysis, AdjustedEarnings.
There's a lot of great stuff on this thread for generalists.
I got nervous about this stock last year, because I didn't know if their high NIM was sustainable; and that, to a large extent, helped them achieve their great efficiency ratio. If NIM and efficiency ratios are not sustainable, they do not deserve to trade at a premium to TBV.
The current origination/paydown trends are a positive and a negative. They are (1) pulling back as new projects don't meet their standards and (2) seeing good projects get permanent financing which are both good signs. But now they are experiencing a slowdown in asset growth, guiding to a possible drop in their non-purchased loan book, and facing headwinds to their NIM & efficiency ratio.
They will make fewer RESG loans as demand worsens around the country. My sense is that competition has heated up as CRE lenders have stopped tightening standards. So it's kind of hard seeing RESG unfunded balances grow, and therefore enough originations to offset large pay downs. I had thought OZK would leverage their relationships, replacing relatively smaller development loans with much larger stabilized real estate loans. That was part of my original thesis, but apparently that is not the case.
Maybe that will change. Otherwise, I am not sure how they will combat falling NIM. It may be hard to build the same deposit franchise, that investors in the space like so much. It's also now nearly impossible to see them make an accretive acquisition.