Mr Pink

I’m not interested in going back and forth on this and really don’t care who thinks what about the stock – so this is a one-time comment (no need for anyone to respond). I think some of the comments here are extremely unfair to Leanne – who I believe has thus far been very fair to all shareholders and has taken a number of intelligent steps to create value on a per-share basis. I think she has acted quite honorably. Obviously everyone is entitled to their opinion - that is mine. Clearly this situation isn’t the right fit for some people – and that’s great – but I do think that anonymously criticizing Leanne on the internet is very inappropriate given the circumstances. I for one sincerely appreciate her actions and integrity over the past few years. I will admit that I preferred the old company name :) Disclosure– I own shares here.

I think there is a lot to be said for assuming that adults can make their own decisions vs. many traditional definitions on this topic - although there are a lot of cases/examples that give me pause with this boundary as well. But I tend to agree that companies which harm their customers without real knowledgeable consent are especially problematic. I'd be curious if anyone has thoughts on the geographic part of the question. This may not come up for a lot of people but are there geographies that you would not feel comfortable investing in for a definable reason (apart from legal reasons)?

I presume people on this board have been asked from time to time whether they invest ethically. I'd be interested to hear anyone's thoughts on where they would draw their lines on investment ethics. If anyone has an all encompassing acid test - that'd be interesting - but in the absence of that - I'd be curious to hear from anyone: What industry/business is just barely acceptable to invest in? Which one is barely unacceptable? What would be the criteria for that decision? Same question for geography: which country would be barely OK vs. just over the line? In both cases - this would be for a passive shareholding in a publicly traded company. You feel the investment is potentially stellar but not life changing. Your investment would not meaningfully change the businesses cost of capital. Appreciate anyone's thoughts on the topic

I'd be down. The 9th would be better though...

Alright - see everyone tomorrow at 4:30

Think thats a quorum. Same place/time as before? Location: Napa Valley Grille Address: 1100 Glendon Ave Los Angeles 90024 Time: 4:30PM

Nov 2 good for me. How do other ppl feel?

How about Friday the 27th?

Traveling later in the week but could do Monday the 9th

Great. May 30th good?

Anyone interested to do another one of these on either May 30 or 31 at one of the usual spots?

There is a new Istanbul airport... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Istanbul_New_Airport "Atatürk Airport will be closed down once the new airport is operational"

Either 11/30 or 12/6 sound good to me

Hey DD, sounds like you bring an interesting perspective to this so thanks for chiming in! Would love to hear your thoughts on a topic if you have any: mgmt teams frequently talk about how new and shiny their ships/features are (DP2 or 3, etc.) - how much do you think that stuff seems to matter in a tight/loose market? Do you think customers really care/pay any premium for those features/new ships? What advantages do you think newer ships (Anchor or Supply or Anything) really have over "old" ones these days? Thanks!

Is there interest in making this happen? If so - how would the 24th or 25th work as dates?