Jump to content

GPIV33.SA - GP Investments


Packer16

Recommended Posts

They announced the sale today...nice return!

 

São Paulo, June 9, 2014 - GP Investments, Ltd., with its head office at 129, Front Street, Penthouse, Hamilton HM 12, Bermuda ("GP Investments") hereby announces the sale of equity investment in Sascar Participações S.A. ("Sascar" or the "Company") held by GP Capital Partners V, L.P. Fund ("GPCPV"), to Compagnie Financiere du Groupe Michelin "Senard et Cie", a company that holds all industrial and commercial companies and research activities of Groupe Michelin outside France. The deal comprises 100% of Sascar's shares, with other shareholders and co-investors being parties to the purchase and sale agreement, which is subject to certain precedent conditions including the approval of the Brazilian Antitrust Agency (Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Economica - CADE).

 

Founded 15 years ago, Sascar is Brazil's leading fleet management and cargo tracking services firm. The transaction value was based on an enterprise value of R$1.6 billion (around US$ 714 million) for Sascar. Alongside BRZ Investimentos' fund, GPCPV owns 56% of Sascar's total capital. GPCPV will receive approximately US$260 million for its 46% stake in the company.

 

GPCPV's total investment in Sascar will generate a cash-on-cash multiple of 2.6x and an estimated IRR of 33% in U.S. Dollars terms in about three years (or 3.5x cash-on-cash multiple and 45% IRR in Brazilian Reais). The transaction value is subject to the adjustments set forth in the definitive agreements.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 82
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Nice...

Was it carried on their NAV at its cost?

Then we suddenly gain sth near 50% of equity value?

 

They announced the sale today...nice return!

 

São Paulo, June 9, 2014 - GP Investments, Ltd., with its head office at 129, Front Street, Penthouse, Hamilton HM 12, Bermuda ("GP Investments") hereby announces the sale of equity investment in Sascar Participações S.A. ("Sascar" or the "Company") held by GP Capital Partners V, L.P. Fund ("GPCPV"), to Compagnie Financiere du Groupe Michelin "Senard et Cie", a company that holds all industrial and commercial companies and research activities of Groupe Michelin outside France. The deal comprises 100% of Sascar's shares, with other shareholders and co-investors being parties to the purchase and sale agreement, which is subject to certain precedent conditions including the approval of the Brazilian Antitrust Agency (Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Economica - CADE).

 

Founded 15 years ago, Sascar is Brazil's leading fleet management and cargo tracking services firm. The transaction value was based on an enterprise value of R$1.6 billion (around US$ 714 million) for Sascar. Alongside BRZ Investimentos' fund, GPCPV owns 56% of Sascar's total capital. GPCPV will receive approximately US$260 million for its 46% stake in the company.

 

GPCPV's total investment in Sascar will generate a cash-on-cash multiple of 2.6x and an estimated IRR of 33% in U.S. Dollars terms in about three years (or 3.5x cash-on-cash multiple and 45% IRR in Brazilian Reais). The transaction value is subject to the adjustments set forth in the definitive agreements.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what's the last time GP issues new shares?

From what I see, they have been buying back shares from 2013 to 2014

 

he hypes up his stock and then issues shares instead of debt. He hypes it up so he has to issue less shares (because he is a major shareholder himself)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

These guys cancelled a good chunk of options under their 2009 plan and reissued them under the 2011, thereby extending the life and lowering the exercise price materially.

 

Recently, they diverted a significant portion of the carried interest to the managing partners of the underlying companies.

 

Something to consider...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not off the top of my head and it's 23h40 for me. It was in the annual reports and I recall it being discussed in the AR, so you should be able to find it if you search for "carried interest" in the two most recent AR's. Ping me if you don't have any joy finding it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting article - so this article basically casts doubt on their investment track record (after fee) with data - so hard to argue. The main thing is still if the mgt is in align with shareholders and if they pay is excessive

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This guy has made a mistake in reading the US GAAP statements which in part invalidates how bad he presents the situation.  The US GAAP statements require consolidation of the PE vehicles so the fees from third-parties for the PE segment do no show up on the income statement.  Footnote 2(b) discloses the third-party fees collected but not included in the income statement.  The management fees on the US GAAP income statement are only from BRZ Investimentos and GP Advisers.  This is why in there earning releases they do not use the US GAAP statements.  I left the comments on his blog and he has not responded so we will see what his response is.  Right now the AM is at about break-even if you as GP shareholder get the management services for free.  I think the compensation issue is known and has declined over the past 12 months and I am sure 3rd Avenue and Sequoia are ensuring this is taking place going forward.  They also repurchased shares since both of these firms have taken stakes.

 

Packer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Been googling “carry” trying to understand the concept as it applies to GPI. Is the idea that the value of the carry comes from the fund manager reinvesting some/all of that carry rather than pocketing it? Because if it was all taken off the table, the carry would have no value to shareholders, correct? Or is the fund manager not an individual but the company, and therefore the shareholders get the value of the carry (in performance years)?

 

And if the latter is true, a similar company, like Senvest, should be valued based on NAV per share (if historical track record is equal to or above market performance and investments are liquid), plus their capitalized EBIT?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Carry is the incentive fee paid to asset managers above a flat asset management fee.  So for example if you have a 2 and 20 fees structure, you collect a 2% of AUM management fee and 20% above given benchmark (lets say 6%).  The 20% above 6% is the carry.  With this carry, most alternative asset managers sell at higher % of AUM than traditional asset managers who get paid on a flat fee basis.

 

Packer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • 5 months later...
  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...