Jump to content

DISCA/DISCK - Discovery Communications


sleepydragon

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 398
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...

Just saw a banner add on Bloomberg promoting the post merger combined entity with a link to the corporate/IR website.  Anyone else see it yet?  Pretty big turnoff for me and ground for removal from my watch list.  Like STFU and pay down your debt so you can buyback your stock below intrinsic value if you think it's such a great bargain, don't spend shareholder funds to try and pump it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will likely be ineffectual, I agree.  I'm just trying to keep the BS-ometer well tuned.

 

It is promoting the discovery and its global reach.  I thought it could be targeted at cable carriers or something but it references them owning their content and reaching more viewers globally, which I think would be more targeted at investors. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

From the twitterverse:

$DISCA - I guess that T/TWX decision made him rather bullish - 1.4million shares in open market worth ~$33million https://ir.corporate.discovery.com/node/14601/html

 

Nice find.

 

He says he's not interested in marrying content & distribution & yet...?

Maybe he's just anticipating someone else who IS interested in marrying content & distribution?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From the twitterverse:

$DISCA - I guess that T/TWX decision made him rather bullish - 1.4million shares in open market worth ~$33million https://ir.corporate.discovery.com/node/14601/html

 

Tuesday purchase was majority of the shares are would've come before the T/TWX decision unless he somehow got a big block after hours.

 

Maybe he did the same thing people did with TWX: bought before decision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • 4 months later...

 

^ That was discovery channels content 10 years ago. Discovery channel content now are scripted shows like “Deadliest catch”, “Bootleggers” etc. There aren’t really many documentaries to be found in Discovery channels lineup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

This purchase is not quite straightforward as he also did a option collar -- looking out up to 8 years. If I am reading it correctly it's a bullish play? To those who know more of these items view it as protection for some of his 10MM shares or is it a separate play meant to add some additional upside without having to layout cash for another 3MM shares?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This purchase is not quite straightforward as he also did a option collar -- looking out up to 8 years. If I am reading it correctly it's a bullish play? To those who know more of these items view it as protection for some of his 10MM shares or is it a separate play meant to add some additional upside without having to layout cash for another 3MM shares?

 

It is a mildly bearish or somewhat neutral transaction. Malone bought 2.67M shares and simultaneously entered into a "collar" transaction on 3.65M shares he owns. The collar is a short call with strike of $35.79 and a long put with a strike of $25.23. So in effect he is buying some protection by giving up some upside on a portion of his holding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This purchase is not quite straightforward as he also did a option collar -- looking out up to 8 years. If I am reading it correctly it's a bullish play? To those who know more of these items view it as protection for some of his 10MM shares or is it a separate play meant to add some additional upside without having to layout cash for another 3MM shares?

 

It is a mildly bearish or somewhat neutral transaction. Malone bought 2.67M shares and simultaneously entered into a "collar" transaction on 3.65M shares he owns. The collar is a short call with strike of $35.79 and a long put with a strike of $25.23. So in effect he is buying some protection by giving up some upside on a portion of his holding.

 

I am not sure it leans towards bearish in this case. If he want just protection, he could have only done the zero cost collar. There is no need to buy additional 2.67m shares. Really no need to lay out 75m dollars for a put protection of 1m shares.

 

A speculation could be that he put up 3.65m shares as collateral for something, and might need to hedge that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FWIW - my own 2-cents is that Malone is mildly bullish about DISCK (now that they've started buying back stock again after a hiatus to pay down debt from the Scripps acquisition from July, 2017).  I think Malone had said back then that DISCK would stop the buyback until they could pay down debt to a comfortable level and then they would start up their repurchase program again - which they just did.  That's why he's buying now (post-quiet period from the quarterly earnings).

 

When Malone buys for his own portfolio, he uses margin pretty aggressively.  My theory is that he took on a cashless collar to hedge because he's on margin.  He is in effect minimizing his cash outlay in every way possible (margin, downside protection, cashless hedges).  His only cost is he's giving up a bit of the upside - but that's an opportunity cost.

 

wabuffo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FWIW - my own 2-cents is that Malone is mildly bullish about DISCK (now that they've started buying back stock again after a hiatus to pay down debt from the Scripps acquisition from July, 2017).  I think Malone had said back then that DISCK would stop the buyback until they could pay down debt to a comfortable level and then they would start up their repurchase program again - which they just did.  That's why he's buying now (post-quiet period from the quarterly earnings).

 

When Malone buys for his own portfolio, he uses margin pretty aggressively.  My theory is that he took on a cashless collar to hedge because he's on margin.  He is in effect minimizing his cash outlay in every way possible (margin, downside protection, cashless hedges).  His only cost is he's giving up a bit of the upside - but that's an opportunity cost.

 

wabuffo

 

Malone may be mildly bullish on DISCK but the transaction by itself is mildly bearish I think. The net result is that he is short 1M shares. He hates paying taxes so he would rather not sell 1M shares today and so he is posting postponing any sell decision to 2027 due to European options while getting some downside protection + some upside to current price in the meantime. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thinking a bit more about it, I now see it as a mildly bullish transaction. Let us just look at the 3.65M shares that are affected by the collar minus the purchase cost for the 2.67M additional shares.

 

Case 1: DISCK goes to $35.79 and Malone gets called. The he walks away with $55.8M net (=35.79*3.65-2.67*28.03). If never entered into this transaction, then his current 1M shares would be worth $35.8M.

 

Case 2: DISCK goes to $50 and Malone gets called. Then he still walks away with $55.8M net. If never did this transaction, his take on the 1M shares is only $50M.

 

Case 3: DISCK goes to $0 and Malone puts his shares for $25.23. He walks away with $17M (=$25.23*3.65-2.67*$28.03). If he never did this transaction, his take would be worth $0 on the unhedged 1M shares.

 

Of course, he could have also entered into a hedging collar on just the 1M shares w/o buying an additional 2.65M shares in which case his upside would be $35.8M and his downside would be $25.23M.

 

So he increased his upside while slightly increasing his downside relative to collar on only the 1M shares he already owns. Therefore the overall transaction is mildly bullish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...