Jump to content

9984 - Softbank


yadayada

Recommended Posts

Wow.

 

On one hand, I like this better than a lot of money losing unicorns.

 

On the other hand, the price is high, the business is competitive even with all ARM moat.

 

Moat is there though it has to be carefully managed.

 

I'll repeat myself  8) but this one of my big mistakes of omission in the past: not buying and holding tons of ARM in 2003 or so. Bought some, sold at minor gain or wash. Stupid me.

 

They should have bought ARM years ago. At least instead of Sprint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 191
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Before Transaction

28% of Alibaba: 57b

43% of Yahoo JP: 11b

Total Investment Assets: >68b

 

Operational Assets

80% of Sprint: 16b

Core Business: 6.61 EBIT x10=66b

Total Operational Assets: 82b

 

Cash from end of FY 2015: ~24b

Cash from Gungho/Alibaba/Supercell sales: 21b

Total Cash: 45b

 

Value of Assets: 195b

Debt: 89b

Value of equity: 106b USD

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...
  • 1 month later...

 

 

 

I would've liked some deeper discussion about Cainiao and PayTM for Alibaba. As well as Coupang, Grab, Oyo, and Freecharge on the Softbank side.

 

For example, Cainiao delivers twice as many packages as UPS per day and Alibaba are opening the service up to do parcel logistics for anyone. UPS has a market cap of $100B. Not an apples to apples comparison, but worth considering. Same goes for those other names.

 

Anyway, it was an interesting read. Some of the points, especially about Son's media image versus his actual approach to debt, were very insightful.

 

Thanks.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have opened a relatively small position in SoftBank.

I think of it as a "technology index fund of the East". And it is the best way imo to get a piece of both Alibaba and ARM, two great companies.

Compared to a SOTP valuation its share price is still very cheap.

Of course, there is the debt issue: but much of it is in Sprint and Sprint is starting to make a positive EBIT and it will probably grow and improve it from now on. Second, there is SoftBank's public stocks portfolio, which is about the same size of its debt. Therefore, Masayoshi Son says that SoftBank is effectively net debt zero.

 

Cheers,

 

Gio

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have opened a relatively small position in SoftBank.

I think of it as a "technology index fund of the East". And it is the best way imo to get a piece of both Alibaba and ARM, two great companies.

Compared to a SOTP valuation its share price is still very cheap.

Of course, there is the debt issue: but much of it is in Sprint and Sprint is starting to make a positive EBIT and it will probably grow and improve it from now on. Second, there is SoftBank's public stocks portfolio, which is about the same size of its debt. Therefore, Masayoshi Son says that SoftBank is effectively net debt zero.

 

Cheers,

 

Gio

Why not just buy baba stock then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Why not just buy baba stock then?

 

 

 

I can't speak for Giofranchi, but if you take the view that BABA is trading at something of a discount given the growth prospects for its core retail business as well as Alipay, Cainiao, and their stakes in Didi, PayTM, etc then any movement of its stock price towards a fairer value will have an outsize impact on Softbank because of the far bigger effective discount that Softbank's BABA stock is trading at.

 

This assumes an investor trusts management's ability to allocate capital intelligently, but Son tends to do that more often than not. Recently, there have been substantial share buybacks at a big discount and the supposedly terrible Sprint investment is in the black on a currency-adjusted basis while the turnaround continues to go well.

 

Before the ARM purchase, Softbank liquidated about $8B worth of BABA stock. If they continue to liquidate BABA stock every few years, then all things being equal, it will have a far higher economic value for SFTBY shareholders than it would for an ordinary BABA shareholder who was liquidating their position.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why not just buy baba stock then?

 

Probably because I have no strongly held views in technology. I prefer to have exposure to BABA, ARM, and a myriad of other businesses, than to have exposure to BABA alone. In other words I prefer a basket approach. Is SoftBank a sort of basket in technology put together by Masa Son? If so, that's fine with me!

While reading "Alibaba - The House That Jack Ma Built", I have found what Jack Ma has said about Masa Son to be very interesting. Please, find it in attachment.

 

Cheers,

 

Gio

Image.thumb.png.d3283987431965109348c16e22aba20b.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yes, maybe not outright short, but at least to be cautious at this point......

 

Guess it's time to start shorting Softbank then.

 

Why now?

It seems to me that SoftBank has never been on a sounder footing since the acquisition of Sprint.

There are also new rumors a merger between T-Mobile and Sprint might come soon:

http://www.cnbc.com/2017/02/17/softbank-eyes-sprint-t-mobile-deals.html

And Sprint has finally started generating some positive FCF and is still improving.

Meanwhile, SoftBank remains very cheap on a SOTP basis.

Am I wrong?

 

Cheers,

 

Gio

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yes, maybe not outright short, but at least to be cautious at this point......

 

Guess it's time to start shorting Softbank then.

 

Maybe lighten up on a long just in case.

 

Dennis,

You see serious issues here at this point? If so, would you mind sharing them?

 

Thank you!

 

Gio

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey Gio,

 

I actually sort of agree with you, if they can somehow merge S with TMUS then it's probably safe to assume that the investment is no longer a zero.  Most SoftBank investors were marking that down to zero or shorting out S to get comfortable with the SOTP.

 

But SOTP is probably not the right way to value SoftBank.  It's a super levered equity stub that seems to always trade at a low multiple of earnings.  I don't buy into the whole "our public holdings offset the debt so we're not levered."  A lot of Masa's decisions are highly unusual and in many cases just bizarre. 

 

I also wonder what BABA is really worth.  I get some super shady vibes out of management at that company...

 

Sorry, I don't have a real view on this.  Used to own shares, don't anymore.  Seems like it can be a home run from here or a total disaster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys just need to have the Gambler's Instinct. When I bought my SFTBY shares after I found out about the co., I didn't short out any Sprint to offset my exposure. My shares tanked something like 50% before coming back to where they are today, which is up 30% from my purchase and has beaten the market.

 

I think all this smarty pants stuff about shorting out exposures to create stubs is unnecessary, confusing, and probably not that helpful. If you're investing in a controlled company like this one is, you'd better be comfortable with management's strategy because due to path dependence, future deals may end up helping shape the outcome of previous ones.

 

I'm in with Masa and will ride this sucker to $0 if that's where it's going... I think he's way too interesting of a character not to participate in whatever the hell his mind comes up with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey Gio,

 

I actually sort of agree with you, if they can somehow merge S with TMUS then it's probably safe to assume that the investment is no longer a zero.  Most SoftBank investors were marking that down to zero or shorting out S to get comfortable with the SOTP.

 

But SOTP is probably not the right way to value SoftBank.  It's a super levered equity stub that seems to always trade at a low multiple of earnings.  I don't buy into the whole "our public holdings offset the debt so we're not levered."  A lot of Masa's decisions are highly unusual and in many cases just bizarre. 

 

I also wonder what BABA is really worth.  I get some super shady vibes out of management at that company...

 

Sorry, I don't have a real view on this.  Used to own shares, don't anymore.  Seems like it can be a home run from here or a total disaster.

 

Thank you Dennis!

Your point of view is always very useful.

Why do you believe a SOTP analysis is not the right way to value the company?

For me it is a small position anyway: if it turns out right, very well then. Otherwise, I am not risking much.

 

Cheers,

 

Gio

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys just need to have the Gambler's Instinct. When I bought my SFTBY shares after I found out about the co., I didn't short out any Sprint to offset my exposure. My shares tanked something like 50% before coming back to where they are today, which is up 30% from my purchase and has beaten the market.

 

I think all this smarty pants stuff about shorting out exposures to create stubs is unnecessary, confusing, and probably not that helpful. If you're investing in a controlled company like this one is, you'd better be comfortable with management's strategy because due to path dependence, future deals may end up helping shape the outcome of previous ones.

 

I'm in with Masa and will ride this sucker to $0 if that's where it's going... I think he's way too interesting of a character not to participate in whatever the hell his mind comes up with.

 

Thank you for your perspective, Scott!

Always very useful.

 

Cheers,

 

Gio

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't like SOTP here because Masa is borrowing at something like 2% to buy assets compounding 20-30%.  You can say it trades for some 30% discount to a fully-taxed NAV but NAV could easily jump 20-30% next year and so what if it trades at that NAV?  You can't just sell it because it might continue to compound some crazy NAV.  So if it works out you'll always be thinking you have some fully valued stock even though it might be earning $20 billion of underlying earnings in several years.  The underlying earnings are constantly being reinvested in all kinds of crazy situations (like S or BABA purchases or some $100 billion hedge fund) making it too hard to keep calculating a SOTP.

 

Plus I think there is some chance that BABA blows up  Why else would they sell any of their position?  It always seemed so against them to part with any of it.  The Arora situation was simply bizarre (I guess he spearheaded the effort to sell down that stake as well as Supercell?).

 

I'd rather just figure out what the underlying earnings are behind all the business segments, throw some 10x multiple as "normal" and assume it will always be a 10x business because he'll be levered up his eyeballs until the end of time.  Then it's just a matter of looking at how earnings will grow and that's a hard question to answer... I'd probably still own shares if I hadn't found something more to my liking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't like SOTP here because Masa is borrowing at something like 2% to buy assets compounding 20-30%.  You can say it trades for some 30% discount to a fully-taxed NAV but NAV could easily jump 20-30% next year and so what if it trades at that NAV?  You can't just sell it because it might continue to compound some crazy NAV.  So if it works out you'll always be thinking you have some fully valued stock even though it might be earning $20 billion of underlying earnings in several years.  The underlying earnings are constantly being reinvested in all kinds of crazy situations (like S or BABA purchases or some $100 billion hedge fund) making it too hard to keep calculating a SOTP.

 

Plus I think there is some chance that BABA blows up  Why else would they sell any of their position?  It always seemed so against them to part with any of it.  The Arora situation was simply bizarre (I guess he spearheaded the effort to sell down that stake as well as Supercell?).

 

I'd rather just figure out what the underlying earnings are behind all the business segments, throw some 10x multiple as "normal" and assume it will always be a 10x business because he'll be levered up his eyeballs until the end of time.  Then it's just a matter of looking at how earnings will grow and that's a hard question to answer... I'd probably still own shares if I hadn't found something more to my liking.

 

Thank you again!

 

Cheers,

 

Gio

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...