Jump to content

TESB.BR - Tessenderlo Group


skanjete

Recommended Posts

Tack will stay, that's for sure. He won't sell.

So the share price to him is of no matter, unless he can be opportunistic in buying some more. I think he controls about 36% of the company now.

 

Valuation and the question whether this is a no brainer or not, is something everyone has to determine for himself.

 

Right now, the EV. is about 31€/sh, for a EBITDA of about 5,2€/sh in 2016 or EV/EBITDA =5,96.

P/E is about 15,5. Is this cheap? A no-brainer? This depends who is looking at these figures.

 

If Tack can continue as he did in the past 2 years, I think this is cheap. Can it get cheaper still? Of course! I bought some as recently as February at 23€/sh. So everything is possible...

 

Of course, the low hanging fruit in terms of efficiency gains will be gone by now. But if they succeed in investing their cash flow at high ROI, a lot is possible still.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 193
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 1 month later...

EBITDA forcast is a little lower again. They expect only +10% for 2016, mainly because Kerley was weaker than expected.

The good news however is that bio valorisation is profitable again and from now on, expansion investments will start to come on stream.

 

 

So, less than 1 year after the proposed merger of Tessenderlo and Picanol, where are we?

Tack proposed a merger on a relative valuation of 31,5€/sh for Tessenderlo and 45,85€/sh for Picanol.

Tack would gain control of  somewhat more than 50% of the combined group, with lots of free cash flow from Picanol to invest in the consolidation in the chemicals sector.

 

Shareholders under the lead of Meryl Wittmer blocked the deal because the relative valuation numbers "didn't make any sense".

 

Now, less than a year later, we have :

- Tessenderlo share at 29€, 8% lower than the valuation

- Picanol share at 73€, 59% above the valuation price

- Tack still controls more than 90% of Picanol.

- Through purchases on the open market at less than 31,5€/sh (yesterday 1mio shares), Tack now also controls almost 40% (39,63%) of Tessenderlo.

 

For now, it seems Tack did a very good deal and Meryl did a very bad deal by blocking the deal...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since we have no clue how the merged cos would have traded, I don't see your argument as very convincing...

What we can say, in hindsight, is: we should have all bought PIC! But hindsight is easy.

 

Anyway, regarding the results: +10% is certainly not bad, though Tack has gotten us used to better.

I believe patience is key, since two new plants will only come online in S2 2017.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suggest you look up the numbers. Both companies trade in line with their result evolution.

 

And my argument was mainly that the proposed transaction by Tack was fair for all shareholders, contrary to what was suggested by Meryl.

I think there can't be any discussion anymore that the valuations did make sense after all.

 

About buying PIC instead of TESB : as you know, only less than 1.700.000sh PIC were available, de rest controlled is by Tack.

This aspect has been discussed here before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

skanjete,

 

you already know of my frustration with wittmer, and the various people who so quickly jumped to insult the character of tack.

 

My investment is principally in picanol not tessenderlo so I have not suffered financially because of these peoples' stupidity but I nonetheless have found it upsetting. 1. Because BRK is a large investment of mine and I don't like the idea of a someone on the board so quick to judge (poorly) and 2. It's a shame to insult Tack and make him think that having a public company is not fun and that he can not find a group of grateful and supportive shareholders.

 

Anyway, maybe that 1m block was wittmer creeping away!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 5 months later...

It seems as if between Picanol and Tessenderlo, Picanol, aside from liquidity issues, is the still the better company, on a PE and EV/EBITDA and free cash flow basis.  I was thinking of buying a little more of Tessenderlo, but now I think that Picanol is the way to go, with the caveat that Tack is buying Tessenderlo's stock.

 

Skanjete (or anyone else) did you attend the Picanol annual meeting?

 

Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 9 months later...

The annual report is out.

https://www.tessenderlo.com/EN/Documents/Annual%20reports/Annual%20report%202017%20ENG.pdf

 

Tack and Haspeslagh foresee a stagnation of revenues in 2018.

This is despite the many growth investments they've made and the new factories they opened in 2017...

Management seems hard at work deeply reshaping the company's organization, building new factories and doing product R&D.

opinions?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The annual report is out.

https://www.tessenderlo.com/EN/Documents/Annual%20reports/Annual%20report%202017%20ENG.pdf

 

Tack and Haspeslagh foresee a stagnation of revenues in 2018.

This is despite the many growth investments they've made and the new factories they opened in 2017...

Management seems hard at work deeply reshaping the company's organization, building new factories and doing product R&D.

opinions?

 

Chemicals and particularly their markets (fertilizer, constructions tubes) are cyclical, especially with respect to margins ). I think most chemical companies in Europe expect a down year in terms of profits for Y2018.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...
  • 6 months later...
  • 5 months later...

Look at free cash flow! And this without any working capital bonus...

 

Also, it strikes me again how they present results in a way that downplays their progress.

In what way do you feel they're downplaying the results (taking the power plant somewhat out of the equation)? I agree results look strong, espescially impressive compared to results of other chemical companies atm, but I feel like it's difficult to get a grasp for where they're going (guides to increased earnings...). Do you feel you have a good idea for what'll drive earnings in the coming years or is it a matter of high uncertainty, low risk (follow Tackes money?)? (probably a combination?).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Market cap 1.1B, FCF 145MM = 7.5X.

 

From their annual report, released 3/26.

 

Note how essential their markets are. Revenue should hold up well.

 

This stock is a bargain.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

In light of the latest developments concerning the global spread of the COVID-19 (Coronavirus) disease,

Tessenderlo Group is taking all the necessary steps to ensure that it keeps its people safe and keep its plants

and businesses running. This is because the group provides support for vital services and the flow of crucial

goods. Tessenderlo Group supplies the basic chemicals for the production of drinking water based on side

streams in the form of hydrochloric acid from the production of sulfate of potash (SOP). In addition, the

group produces gelatin for medical and food applications, crop nutrition and crop protection products for

agriculture (for which the season is just starting in the northern hemisphere), and plastic pipe systems for

maintaining drinking water supply systems and polluted water evacuation, while Akiolis protects the meat

chain (in France).

 All of the plants and activities are running in line with expectations at the moment, except for the current

disruption of production at DYKA Group’s French plant in Sainte-Austreberthe (segment Industrial Solutions).

In February 2020, the COVID-19 disease also disrupted production at the Chinese plant in Nehe (PB Leiner –

segment Bio-valorization), which restarted production in early March. Based on current information, the

impact of these events on the financial results is expected to be limited.

 Activities could be further impacted in the coming weeks or months if too many employees are impacted by

COVID-19 and/or if access to raw materials and auxiliary materials or means of transportation becomes more

complicated, or if our customers are no longer able to process our products

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...