Jump to content

Buffett/Berkshire - general news


Recommended Posts

Thank you very much for sharing, KFS,

I couldn't find it yesterday. I enjoyed listening to it this morning.

After that, I went beserk on saxo.com, ordering three books about Berkshire by Lawrence Cunningham [As a Dane, my calculations appear to show that's a cheaper way to get those particular books, compared to ordering them on Amazon].

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/25/2021 at 2:20 PM, ValueMaven said:

Thank you. I am big of fan of that podcast. I miss the voice/intellect of the gentleman who was doing the podcast with Stig, but also appreciate his Bitcoin dedicated podcasts (the not so complicated ones). On the Bloomstran episode, I wasnot able to catch all the nuances. I run while listening to these and this was 2 hours long and very in depth, but here is two comments:

- why is it Bloomstran the only person that talks about the Gen Re pivot. Does he have some sort of intellectual property right on pointing that out and drawing that conclusion. Even Buffet hates the fact that he issued shares (even at a premuim)

- if folks criticize Buffet for not going deep into March 2020 bear market (and selling JPM and the airlines at the wrong time), he is fully responsible for some of that criticism ONLY because he has been the one preaching the "when it rains, bring your bucket" mentality. Now the reason for doing what he did is perfectly ok and correct, but my point is that Buffet has been cultivating an image of a stock picker investor over the decades hunting for deals .... but what he really is, is a CEO of a fairly large conglomerate, first, who also happens to be stock picker value investor. So if people expected for him to go wild and picking up the bargains in April through May 2020, that was on the back of decades of expectations that was built up by him directly.

When was the last time you saw Buffet on CNBC and talking in-depth about the railway, insurance operations. He likes talking stocks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks.  I will table it then.  I listen to far too many podcasts as it is.  I bought that new "Capital Allocation" book about early Berk.  Not a fan of the lack of formatting/options in the kindle store version (it's basically a PDF, so no changing fonts or anything), might be better to get a hard copy.

Edited by CorpRaider
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, John Hjorth said:

CorpRaider & longterminvestor,

I started listening to that podcast, too, trying to take it in, in bites. I got derailed when I heard about the site Berkshire Nerds , and I got a good laugh of the FAQ on the website! [  : - )  ]

What is a Charlie Munger? Sounds like a legitimate existential question.

I dug into the footer link & found this.

www.tinycapital.com/companies

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Berkshire 10-Q is out, which shows repurchases of 4606 A shares during the quarter, and the share count dropped by another 400 or so between 3/31 and the date of the filing.  So call it about 5000 A shares repurchased between 1/1 - 4/22.  A much larger repurchase program than in years past, but not an exceptionally high amount of A shares to result in the much increased volume of that class, so that mystery is still outstanding.

For a somewhat striking comparison, I've been reading old annual reports again recently, and I noticed in 1975 they repurchased 6,647 A shares for a total price of $432,055 during the year. Today that amount of money can get you just over 1 share, or looked at another way they spent 1.52 billion on the just 4606 A shares they repurchased in Q1. Good thing he did at least some of the buyback back then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, aws said:

The Berkshire 10-Q is out, which shows repurchases of 4606 A shares during the quarter, and the share count dropped by another 400 or so between 3/31 and the date of the filing.  So call it about 5000 A shares repurchased between 1/1 - 4/22.  A much larger repurchase program than in years past, but not an exceptionally high amount of A shares to result in the much increased volume of that class, so that mystery is still outstanding.

For a somewhat striking comparison, I've been reading old annual reports again recently, and I noticed in 1975 they repurchased 6,647 A shares for a total price of $432,055 during the year. Today that amount of money can get you just over 1 share, or looked at another way they spent 1.52 billion on the just 4606 A shares they repurchased in Q1. Good thing he did at least some of the buyback back then.

My math is a little different:

Count as of Dec 31

Class A equivalent: 1,543,960

Count as of March 31 

Class A equivalent: 1,525,655  (Count reduced by 18,305 shares or 1.2%)

Count as of April 22 

Class A equivalent: 1,522,371 (Count reduced by 3,284 shares or 0.2%)

 

TOTAL BUY FROM DEC 31 TO APRIL 22

21,589 Class A equivalent shares or 1.4%

 

  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Cant complain about anything Ive read so far.

Hopefully there is a minimum quarterly repurchase allocation that ramps with discretion. If BRK can buy ~5%(or lets say$20B) of its outstanding shares per year minimum, this becomes a big time winner under almost any circumstance if you have a 5-10 year horizon. , 

My fear would be that at a certain price, they stop altogether. Which I am sure some folks embrace, but also is ruthlessly ignorant of the fact that people have been calling the market wildly overvalued for almost the entirety of the past decade. At the end of the day, nobody knows for sure what characteristics or variables will be the true drivers, and as a result, flexibility in the approach is probably the best way to go. Hoarding cash in the current environment is more dangerous than hoarding Berkshire shares. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, longterminvestor said:

My math is a little different:

Count as of Dec 31

Class A equivalent: 1,543,960

Count as of March 31 

Class A equivalent: 1,525,655  (Count reduced by 18,305 shares or 1.2%)

Count as of April 22 

Class A equivalent: 1,522,371 (Count reduced by 3,284 shares or 0.2%)

 

TOTAL BUY FROM DEC 31 TO APRIL 22

21,589 Class A equivalent shares or 1.4%

 

  

Perhaps I should have made it clearer, but I was specifically just talking about a discussion from the previous pages about a big increase in A share volume recently, not about the total A share equivalent repurchase. It was possible that Buffett was preferring to buyback A shares, even at a bigger premium, for some reason and that resulted in the higher volume of that class recently. I'm sure the overall buyback numbers you quoted are correct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, aws said:

Perhaps I should have made it clearer, but I was specifically just talking about a discussion from the previous pages about a big increase in A share volume recently, not about the total A share equivalent repurchase. It was possible that Buffett was preferring to buyback A shares, even at a bigger premium, for some reason and that resulted in the higher volume of that class recently. I'm sure the overall buyback numbers you quoted are correct.

?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you & very well said, Greg,

Personally, I think about this as a private investor saving and only holding cash & T-bills for the long term. It's doomed to failure in the sense of underperformance for the long term. In fact, Mr. Buffett has been a proponent of exactly this stance & point many times over the years.

I think it was some two to three years ago that I was about have had enough of this continuous cash build and seriously considered to reduce my Berkshire position and go somewhere else with the proceeds.

gfp has also earlier here on CoBF short time ago expressed, that the buybacks for sure appear price sensitive in some way. Mr. Buffett also verbally confirmed it under the AGM yesterday.

Let's just hope it doesn't run up too much, so that the buybacks come to a halt.

- - - o 0 o - - -

Just a few additions here, hopefully without these additions being perceived as too much nitpicking by my fellow CoBF members :

  1. Mr. Buffett mentioned under the AGM yesterday that the minimum cash position of USD 20 B is under consideration for a raise [, which to me makes sense - float is still gradually increasing, and as of now [EOP 2021Q1] stands at USD 140 B].
  2. Calculation of "excess cash" ["dead money"] should actually include a deduction for cash at hand at BHE, because that cash is de facto earmarked for reinvestment in BHE [no dividends from BHE to the parent].
  3. I think it was at the 2017 AGM, that Mr. Buffett was asked a question about the cash build, where he expressed something along these lines [,so not an exact quote here] : "... there is no way we can sit here in front you and consider ourselves a success with more than USD 150 B in cash & cash equivalents on the balance sheet ...". Somehow, Mr. Buffett - so far - has lived up to that.
Edited by John Hjorth
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Opinion (opportunity cost aspect): over the next 10 years, BRK has a very reasonable chance to outperform the S&P 500. My guess would be by 5 to 10% at the end of the following ten years.

As for the future, the challenge is always to move from the short term to the long term. Easier said than done.

A table was included showing the 20 largest companies in the world (market cap) in 1989. Then, 13 of the 20 companies were based in Japan (6 of the 13, banks). The future is indeed unknowable and BRK is also likely to be less risky (both the traditional and 'modern' definitions of risk).

BRK 15.png

BRK 10 year.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ValueMaven said:

I dunno, a few numbers in the article seems off. I get:

Shareh. equ. in million 447987
Q end A shares 1525655
BV per A 293636
BV per B 195.76

and:

 
cash & equiv. 56826
treasury bills 85385
cash railroad 3228
NET CASH 145439
   
   
   
   
Edited by backtothebeach
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, aws said:

The cash difference is explained by the $4b liability for treasury bills they bought in March and paid for in April, otherwise you'd be counting the cash and the bills.

Thanks, I missed the liability:

cash & equiv. 56,826
treasury bills 85,385
cash railroad 3,228
payable for treasuries -4,084
NET CASH 141,355
Link to comment
Share on other sites

“The directors are in agreement that if something were to happen to me tonight, it would be Greg who’d take over tomorrow morning,” Buffett said. He praised Abel and Vice Chairman Ajit Jain, who runs all of Berkshire’s insurance operations.

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/03/when-warren-buffett-eventually-steps-down-as-berkshire-hathaway-ceo-greg-abel-will-succeed-him.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, aws said:

“The directors are in agreement that if something were to happen to me tonight, it would be Greg who’d take over tomorrow morning,” Buffett said. He praised Abel and Vice Chairman Ajit Jain, who runs all of Berkshire’s insurance operations.

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/03/when-warren-buffett-eventually-steps-down-as-berkshire-hathaway-ceo-greg-abel-will-succeed-him.html

 

And there is the Munger statement as well when they were discussing culture where he said: "Greg will keep it that way"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is a crazy but interesting idea.  Berkshire issues $20B shares to acquire Markel.  Get's huge float, profitable and unique underwriting business it can easily fold into the Primary Group.  Gayner joins the board.  Then buysback $20B worth of stock.  Roll Markel Ventures into MSR unit.  

Just an idea ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...