Jump to content

VIAB - Viacom


Guest JoelS

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 106
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Wow, Citi downgrade really knocked this down!

 

They site the potential for DISH to drop Viacom and only 10% chance Viacom is acquired.

 

Very baffling downgrade.

 

Dish seems all over the place.  They get into a battle with CBS that pulls the channels for a while.  They drop FOX - still off the air.  Now they may drop Viacom? And on top of that they start up this Sling TV OTT service.  Low priced, minimal content for people who already have a separate internet connection.  That strikes at the heart of Dish's customer base.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whoops :)

 

"Viacom's (VIAB) carriage deal with DISH is not up for renewal in 2015, says a company spokesman. Citi--which downgraded VIAB to sell from buy this morning while putting a 50% probability on DISH dropping VIAB offerings like MTV, Nickelodeon and Comedy Central--said the carriage renewal was "likely slated for 2015."

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's been popping up on the magic formula screen, despite having a market cap minimum of 50 million and 30 stocks. 

 

Its got to be a hidden cash cash, high return on capital and cheap on an enterprise business basis. 

 

It's worth looking into.  I got the 10K in tonight, I'll share some thoughts later on this week if something sticks out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stifel Upgrades Viacom On Positive Growth Outlook: In a report published Friday, Stifel analyst Benjamin Mogil upgraded the rating on Viacom, Inc. (NASDAQ: VIAB) from Hold to Buy, and named an $89.00 price target.

 

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/stifel-upgrades-viacom-positive-growth-135611994.html

 

Quite the disparity between Citi and Sifel ($62 target for Citi & $89 for Stifel)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really hope Viacom is buying back shares here:

10 PE for a company that has around a 50% ROE and strong media brands seems like a good bet.

 

I think they telegraphed the plan to buyback $1bn+ (the back of my mind says $1.3bn) on their year end call.  At a fixed $ amount and today's prices, the # of share being acquired is just going higher and higher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I'm surprised the stock isn't down more on the Jon Stewart announcement.  Comedy Central had three key levers for a long time, South Park, the Daily Show, and the Colbert report.  They've lost two of those now.  The big winner is probably Daniel Tosh. He can ask for more money to stay.

 

I'm guessing NFLX would be willing to offer a boatload of cash to the South park guys.  They can do a new episode in a day or two and the ability to stream the past episodes would be huge.

 

Comedy Central is a much weaker property and VIAB is going to have a lot less leverage in negotiating with MVPDs.  I think there is a real possibility they get dropped by Dish in the next few years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm surprised the stock isn't down more on the Jon Stewart announcement.  Comedy Central had three key levers for a long time, South Park, the Daily Show, and the Colbert report.  They've lost two of those now.  The big winner is probably Daniel Tosh. He can ask for more money to stay.

 

I'm guessing NFLX would be willing to offer a boatload of cash to the South park guys.  They can do a new episode in a day or two and the ability to stream the past episodes would be huge.

 

Comedy Central is a much weaker property and VIAB is going to have a lot less leverage in negotiating with MVPDs.  I think there is a real possibility they get dropped by Dish in the next few years.

 

That's only a hour worth of shows...The rest of comedy central has great shows and doing very well. 

 

Don't think I'm too concerned.  If I didn't have a restriction at work, I'd be buying it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Sentiment is negative around this name because the company doesn't have sports networks and analysts think that niche networks will be the first to go in the bundle.  The company's revenue growth has been anemic and people question management's institutional ability to create new hit content, svod strategy and the wisdom of buying back stock versus spending to grow organically or through M&A.

 

On a PE basis, looks like a slam dunk paying 12x earnings for a highly profitable but slower growth franchise.  On an EBITDA basis, looks decent but not great because of a lack of revenue growth and margin expansion as well as the large $11bn in debt the company has.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The current situation reminds me of AZO in 2008-2009. It was trading around 10-12x earnings and habitually buying back stock (one of the few companies to increase buybacks through the downturn). If VIAB can turn some organic earnings growth then this is extremely cheap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The current situation reminds me of AZO in 2008-2009. It was trading around 10-12x earnings and habitually buying back stock (one of the few companies to increase buybacks through the downturn). If VIAB can turn some organic earnings growth then this is extremely cheap.

 

Are there not a lot of other cheap stocks buying back tons of stock in the market these days?  IBM, DE, OUTR, the list goes on.  The AZO situation was a lot more unique than just buying back a ton of shares.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I have viacom and cbs at those multiples you mentioned for 2016.  If you like the cable network/retransmission story, you should check out fox which has very well positioned cable networks and a broadcast channel and stations (CFO claimed spectrum on a comps basis was worth $9bn recently).  Fox is very likely to have good organic growth both in the US and internationally and is buying back $6bn in stock.

 

I'm not familiar with autozone but I think the key difference is that the cable business model may be under severe threat and we are probably later rather than earlier in the economic cycle.  Company has been borrowing to buy back stock and so has been replacing equity with debt.  The company is turning in organic earnings growth via affiliate and svod licensing fees  but advertising is likely to be hit by diminished ratings in core networks and lower cpms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think VIAB trades around 10x 2016 earnings.

 

DISCA trades around 16 x 2016 earnings

CBS trades around 14x 2016 earnings.

 

DISCA has much better international exposure/growth and therefore less reliant on the shifting sands of US cable tv.  CBS has retrans as well some sports.  So both of those probably deserve a premium on VIAB but the whole sector is pretty beaten down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think VIAB trades around 10x 2016 earnings.

 

DISCA trades around 16 x 2016 earnings

CBS trades around 14x 2016 earnings.

 

DISCA has much better international exposure/growth and therefore less reliant on the shifting sands of US cable tv.  CBS has retrans as well some sports.  So both of those probably deserve a premium on VIAB but the whole sector is pretty beaten down.

 

DISCA may have better international exposure/growth, but that is not a moat or competitive advantage.  It is just a small point of the whole overall story.  US cable tv is shifting, but VIAB is not standing still because they have content people want to see.  ComedyCentral.com for instance and its mobile app direclty link consumers to their shows, adding another source of revenue through ads, which have not been fully monetized yet.  Facebook had a similar worry about how it would monetize mobile.  Once the cable industry, or the content players, figure out how to monetize the digital world, then earnings/revenue will rebound.  That's the problem right?  How do these companies still provide content and are able to monetize and maintain pricing power.  The market is uncertain how well they will do; however, the risk of them failing is very low.  In my opinion. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

DISCA may have better international exposure/growth, but that is not a moat or competitive advantage.  It is just a small point of the whole overall story.  US cable tv is shifting, but VIAB is not standing still because they have content people want to see.  ComedyCentral.com for instance and its mobile app direclty link consumers to their shows, adding another source of revenue through ads, which have not been fully monetized yet.  Facebook had a similar worry about how it would monetize mobile.  Once the cable industry, or the content players, figure out how to monetize the digital world, then earnings/revenue will rebound.  That's the problem right?  How do these companies still provide content and are able to monetize and maintain pricing power.  The market is uncertain how well they will do; however, the risk of them failing is very low.  In my opinion.

 

I would argue that having international distribution is a major competitive advantage.  If you can take your existing programming in the US or remake it to cater to local tastes, it provides a high degree of both financial and creative operational leverage and makes your brand global and more valuable.  Although it is of lesser importance today, being in the bundle of channels offered and having a good location in terms of channel placement creates a virtuous cycle in terms of entrenchment in a particular country's pay-tv ecosystem and partially helps crowd out potential competitors.

 

Viacom is poorly positioned and its ratings are down dramatically.  The company has been using its cash flow to buy back stock and pay dividends instead of allocating capital to acquisitions of youtube channels or ad tech companies or heavily investing in new original content or rapid international growth efforts.  Things are likely to get worse for Viacom in the future if users migrate to less profitable distribution platforms and the company trades "analog dollars for digital dimes".  If a true a la carte environment takes hold in the US, it is reasonable to assume that many people will drop programming such as VH1 and BET.  TV is no longer the only game in town if you want to make large ad buys and reach large audiences.  Advertising is becoming much more metric oriented and cpms are more likely or not to decrease for tv advertising which is made worse by declining ratings.

 

The stock fully reflects the fears over the potential impact of these secular challenges.  I think the bundle is too strong to be broken and despite weakness in some cable networks, the Viacom slate will continue to be held by the vast majority of tv subscribers.  If I'm right, revenue and profitability with increase a bit incrementally, the multiple should expand to reflect the high degree of stability and profitability of the business and buybacks will juice returns by increasing my ownership stake in the company.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Yacktman's comments on Viacom from his annual report:

 

"Viacom’s (VIA) shares were weaker in 2014, due to concerns about the advertising markets and weak ratings at some of its cable networks. Management is working hard to address the ratings issues and the company continues to generate significant amounts of free cash flow. We think Viacom sells at an attractive valuation, and management has been an aggressive repurchaser of shares, buying back nearly one-third of the outstanding shares since the beginning of 2011."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Viacom Plans $785 Million Charge for Restructuring.  Viacom said it would temporarily pause stock buybacks under its current $20 billion program. It expects to resume repurchases by October, when its next fiscal year begins.

 

Nothing better than suspending your share repurchase program when your stock is at 52 week lows.

 

http://www.wsj.com/articles/viacom-announces-restructuring-1428352039?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTTopStories

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Viacom Plans $785 Million Charge for Restructuring.  Viacom said it would temporarily pause stock buybacks under its current $20 billion program. It expects to resume repurchases by October, when its next fiscal year begins.

 

Nothing better than suspending your share repurchase program when your stock is at 52 week lows.

 

http://www.wsj.com/articles/viacom-announces-restructuring-1428352039?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTTopStories

 

They also already bought back $1.5 billion so far this year, and hope to return repurchasing stock no later than Oct. 2015. This is to ensure they have cash on hand and leverage ratios, capital discipline, to undergo corporate restructuring, that if successful, will shed $200-$350 m a year off expenses.

 

If you're an investor, in this case you hope that the stock continues to fall so when they resume they can buy back more when its cheaper before the cost savings and revenue growth are fully recognized by the market.  The market is worried about the strong drop in ratings on all major programs this year, which is why the company is focusing on developing new avenues to distribute content to consumers and ad revenue. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...