Jump to content

LBRDA - Liberty Broadband


Liberty

Recommended Posts

I don't understand why LBRDA is a better buy than CHTR.

They bought CHTR around $70-90 in 2013. Now CHTR has gone up a lot and they will have to pay quite a bit of tax (35% corp rate) if they sell CHTR.

Of course they won't do that stupid thing. If they distribute the CHTR shares to you, what's your cost basis? Is it the same $70-90 cost basis that they originally bought CHTR? If so, you will suddenly owe a lot of tax liability when you sell the CHTR shares. Does anyone know how the cost basis is determined when they spin off CHTR?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 275
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Interesting snipit from LBRDA's 10Q.  Liberty can reduce the funding amount of the $4.4bn LBRDK share offering by 25% and use other means of financing (probably debt?) to cover the 25% reduction.  Assuming Liberty uses debt, this could juice the Co's returns- which also justifies investing in LBRDA/K over CHTR.

 

"Additionally, as discussed in note 5 of the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements, in support of the Time Warner Cable Merger, the Company expects to issue $4.4 billion additional shares of Liberty Broadband Series C common stock in order to purchase $4.3 billion in shares of New Charter. However, Liberty Broadband has the right, and may determine, to incur debt financing (subject to certain conditions) to fund a portion of the purchase price for such shares of New Charter, in which case Liberty Broadband may reduce the aggregate Series C share subscriptions by up to 25%, with such reduction applied pro rata to all investors."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand why LBRDA is a better buy than CHTR.

They bought CHTR around $70-90 in 2013. Now CHTR has gone up a lot and they will have to pay quite a bit of tax (35% corp rate) if they sell CHTR.

Of course they won't do that stupid thing. If they distribute the CHTR shares to you, what's your cost basis? Is it the same $70-90 cost basis that they originally bought CHTR? If so, you will suddenly owe a lot of tax liability when you sell the CHTR shares. Does anyone know how the cost basis is determined when they spin off CHTR?

 

Muscleman, LBRDA is one of my biggest holdings. The reason I prefer to own it rather than straight up CHTR is that I get both the economic benefit of the CHTR business PLUS Malone and Maffei's capital allocation for free. The LBRDA holco gives them flexibility in buying more CHTR, or repurchasing LBRDA shares if the discount to NAV widens, or doing a rights offering, or bringing in hedge fund partners to help with TWC & Bright House acquisitions, or whatever else they see fit... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I don't understand why LBRDA is a better buy than CHTR.

They bought CHTR around $70-90 in 2013. Now CHTR has gone up a lot and they will have to pay quite a bit of tax (35% corp rate) if they sell CHTR.

Of course they won't do that stupid thing. If they distribute the CHTR shares to you, what's your cost basis? Is it the same $70-90 cost basis that they originally bought CHTR? If so, you will suddenly owe a lot of tax liability when you sell the CHTR shares. Does anyone know how the cost basis is determined when they spin off CHTR?

 

Muscleman, LBRDA is one of my biggest holdings. The reason I prefer to own it rather than straight up CHTR is that I get both the economic benefit of the CHTR business PLUS Malone and Maffei's capital allocation for free. The LBRDA holco gives them flexibility in buying more CHTR, or repurchasing LBRDA shares if the discount to NAV widens, or doing a rights offering, or bringing in hedge fund partners to help with TWC & Bright House acquisitions, or whatever else they see fit...

 

So what's the tax status for LBRDA if they eventually decided to give out their CHTR shares? Do you have to pay tax on the cap gain they had due to their very low cost basis?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just received the following reverse split notice from IB. Why are they doing this?  ::)

 

CHTR@NASDAQ (Name: CHARTER COMMUNICATION-A) announced a reverse split effective 20150921. The terms of the split are 4521 : 5000.

 

ISIN : US16117M3051

 

Please click here ( http://ibkb.interactivebrokers.com/node/1619 ) for information regarding IB's corporate action notification process.

 

Please click here ( http://ibkb.interactivebrokers.com/node/1063 ) for important disclosure information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Charter Q3 is out:

 

http://ir.charter.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=112298&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=2104101

 

Key highlights:

 

Residential customer relationships increased by 97,000 during the third quarter, versus 68,000 during the third quarter of 2014. For the twelve months ending September 30, 2015, residential customer relationships grew by 5.0%, or 290,000.

 

Residential primary service units ("PSUs") increased by 180,000 during the third quarter versus a gain of 114,000 in the prior-year period, including residential video net additions of 12,000.

 

Following the launch of Spectrum Business pricing and packaging to the small and medium business segment in March 2015, commercial customer relationships grew by 17,000 during the third quarter of 2015, including commercial video customers net additions of 4,000.

Third quarter revenues of $2.5 billion grew 7.2%1 as compared to the prior-year period, driven by residential revenue growth of 7.3% and commercial revenue growth of 13.2%.

 

Third quarter Adjusted EBITDA2 grew by 8.5% year-over-year. Excluding third quarter transactions transition costs of $12 million, third quarter Adjusted EBITDA grew by 9.7% year-over-year.

 

Capital expenditures totaled $509 million in the third quarter of 2015, compared to $569 million during the third quarter of 2014. Excluding transactions transition capital expenditures, third quarter capital expenditures totaled $485 million.

 

Third quarter free cash flow was $208 million, compared to negative free cash flow of $62 million during the prior-year period, driven by higher Adjusted EBITDA, lower capital expenditures and a positive working capital contribution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rumors of the death of residential cable appear to be greatly exaggerated.  If you read the media reports, the proliferation of OTT video and new services would suggest that cable television is in its death throws.  Results from the big cablecos would suggest otherwise.  Chug on cash machine!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rumors of the death of residential cable appear to be greatly exaggerated.  If you read the media reports, the proliferation of OTT video and new services would suggest that cable television is in its death throws.  Results from the big cablecos would suggest otherwise.  Chug on cash machine!

 

In my house there is still a residential cable bill for the internet pipe.

 

It will be terminated when there is a faster/cheaper wireless network.  Hopefully that's coming in the next decade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rumors of the death of residential cable appear to be greatly exaggerated.  If you read the media reports, the proliferation of OTT video and new services would suggest that cable television is in its death throws.  Results from the big cablecos would suggest otherwise.  Chug on cash machine!

 

In my house there is still a residential cable bill for the internet pipe.

 

It will be terminated when there is a faster/cheaper wireless network.  Hopefully that's coming in the next decade.

 

The internet pipe is why I think all the cable cos have massive moats around them and will continue to grow for the foreseeable future.  Above I was actually referring to the video customers.  With all these new OTT services, you'd think cable customers (the video ones) would be declining at double digit %'s.  But the reality appears to be much different.

 

On the internet side, I think the FCC classifying it under Title II has effectively squashed the likelihood of any new providers for quite a while.  Not sure who would invest the $bn's to build out a competing network if the gov't can then come in and set your prices and force you to share with competitors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/time-warner-cable-delivers-best-165000023.html

 

Time Warner Cable Inc. (TWC) today announced that its full-year residential subscriber growth in 2015 was its best ever, highlighted by:

 

Customer relationship net additions of 618,000

Video net additions of 32,000

High-speed data net additions of 1 million

Voice net additions of 1.036 million

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting announcement given that they really don't need to prove anything to anyone- as CHTR will have its own operating plan for TWC which should reignite growth.  The bear view would be that TWC is trying to show investors "how good they are doing" just in case if the deal does not go through. Any thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

How is LBRDA, LBRDK suppose to be tracking CHTR's performance? So far the stock has lag CHTR badly.

 

It's been more or less fine, but with a discount. Today's lack of tracking has to do with the 10:9 exchange in old CHTR for new CHTR shares.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How is LBRDA, LBRDK suppose to be tracking CHTR's performance? So far the stock has lag CHTR badly.

 

It's been more or less fine, but with a discount. Today's lack of tracking has to do with the 10:9 exchange in old CHTR for new CHTR shares.

 

More details here:

 

http://ir.charter.com/mobile.view?c=112298&v=202&d=3&id=aHR0cDovL2FwaS50ZW5rd2l6YXJkLmNvbS9maWxpbmcueG1sP2lwYWdlPTEwNDQ0MjEwJkRTRVE9MSZTRVE9NDgmU1FERVNDPVNFQ1RJT05fUEFHRSZleHA9JnN1YnNpZD01Nw%3D%3D

 

(the ratio is 0.9042 to be exact, fractional shares get cash)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Overview of the Malone cable and media empire, covers many of his companies (not just LBRDA):

 

http://www.jnvestor.com/malone/

 

Very good post! :)

 

+1!

I can only imagine the insane amount of research that went into this post and I particularly like Jules's writing style. I would go so far to say that this is the only post you need to read to invest in any of the Malone companies…

 

does anyone have an alternate link? it seems to be broken

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...