Guest notorious546 Posted December 12, 2014 Share Posted December 12, 2014 posted a few hours ago hopefully isn't a repost. Enjoy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Picasso Posted December 12, 2014 Share Posted December 12, 2014 If I hear this clown Tilson say he made 8x his money on NFLX one more time I am going to lose my *bleep*. I randomly forwarded in the video and sure enough "by the way I made 9x my money on Netflix." No dude, on a net basis you barely turned a profit and you kept selling it when it went up so your net return is much less than 9x. The guy is such a joke. And he had the nerve to tell Google his fund outperformed the market by a considerable margin since inception. Just not true. Thanks for the link though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RhubarbXIV Posted December 12, 2014 Share Posted December 12, 2014 At 19:00 he shows a chart of his fund net of fees against the market. Looks like a beat to me. Not anything ludicrous (178% v 120% over 16 years), but squeaking out a win. Most of the outperformance came during the internet bubble bursting, but that's true of most value investors who started in the blessed 1999-2000 vintage. I have a strong distaste for his overlong presentations, his weakly supported theses, and his overly promotional attitude. But let's at least give him credit for what appear to be the facts. If I were lying, I'd show a hell of a lot more outperformance than 3.2% over 16 years, so I'm inclined to take him at his word. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Picasso Posted December 12, 2014 Share Posted December 12, 2014 I missed that part so I stand corrected. Something seems funky since he closed and reopened as KASE a couple years back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peter1234 Posted December 12, 2014 Share Posted December 12, 2014 He actually discussed why and how he was wrong in passing on Google in 2004. Sales growing 2004-2014 despite slightly declining margins turned 'overvalued' Google in 2004 into a home run. It also helped that Yahoo was not the strong competition that the envisioned. ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunrider Posted December 12, 2014 Share Posted December 12, 2014 He actually discussed why and how he was wrong in passing on Google in 2004. Sales growing 2004-2014 despite slightly declining margins turned 'overvalued' Google in 2004 into a home run. It also helped that Yahoo was not the strong competition that the envisioned. ;) Let's not forget - he was at the Motley Fool ... where promotion of track record is fundamental to the business model :) (Ever got your inbox bombed by their advertisement ... might as well be buying gizmo X on that makes lost hair grow back and provides you with espresso, too!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
augustabound Posted December 12, 2014 Share Posted December 12, 2014 .....Something seems funky since he closed and reopened as KASE a couple years back. I was going to ask about that, did he have a partner at T2 and now he's independent? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peter1234 Posted December 12, 2014 Share Posted December 12, 2014 .....Something seems funky since he closed and reopened as KASE a couple years back. I was going to ask about that, did he have a partner at T2 and now he's independent? Yes, his partner was Glenn Tongue (hence T2). Performance lagged and they decided to split. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
augustabound Posted December 12, 2014 Share Posted December 12, 2014 .....Something seems funky since he closed and reopened as KASE a couple years back. I was going to ask about that, did he have a partner at T2 and now he's independent? Yes, his partner was Glenn Tongue (hence T2). Performance lagged and they decided to split. Maybe performance lagged because Tilson was on CNBC once a week and was obsessively working on his Berkshire valuation. Then writing about how undervalued BRK was........................ all the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now