LongTermView Posted June 11, 2017 Share Posted June 11, 2017 The June presentation has some encouraging info. The percentage of annual base rent from leases signed by the Company from inception in July 2015 through March 31, 2017 on page 5 is helpful: 37% Entertainment, food & beverage 20% Value fashion 17% Home 14% Specialty 10% Everyday uses 2% Other The Entertainment, food & beverage category should be relatively safe over the next 10+ years imo. It would be nice if they were more specific with the Everyday uses category. LA Fitness and 24 Hour Fitness are in this group and gyms should be safe over the next 10+ years imo. There are different types of business from other companies in this group like Lucky's Market that are apples to oranges with respect to gyms. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
texual Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 https://www.wsj.com/articles/german-discount-grocer-aldi-sets-u-s-expansion-plan-1497229200 https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-06-12/european-grocery-rivalry-expands-to-u-s-as-aldi-lidl-bulk-up Don't just focus on US store growth (although I do believe there is robust growth ahead for a number of up and coming retail upstarts including Amazon and small concepts like Design Within Reach as well as Equinox). There are many opportunities coming and Sears has the real estate. Not saying the above companies are taking over the SRG portfolio but there are signals. I've been a net buyer of SRG in the past weeks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CorpRaider Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 So when Sears says it intends to raise an additional $1 billion via RE sales this year (right?), you guys conclude it is likely that SRG will bid on that and if successful fund with a rights issue? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BTShine Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 No, not in my opinion. Possible but not necessarily likely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
merkhet Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 So when Sears says it intends to raise an additional $1 billion via RE sales this year (right?), you guys conclude it is likely that SRG will bid on that and if successful fund with a rights issue? Apparently, SRG's management was asked this at the annual meeting and was quite coy about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HJ Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 Let me ask a question: How was the Seritage portfolio initially selected among all of Sears and Kmart locations? Did Seritage get to cherry pick the better of the properties, or was there an objective criteria that resulted in this particular portfolio? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BTShine Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 So when Sears says it intends to raise an additional $1 billion via RE sales this year (right?), you guys conclude it is likely that SRG will bid on that and if successful fund with a rights issue? Apparently, SRG's management was asked this at the annual meeting and was quite coy about it. This year or last? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CorpRaider Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 So when Sears says it intends to raise an additional $1 billion via RE sales this year (right?), you guys conclude it is likely that SRG will bid on that and if successful fund with a rights issue? Apparently, SRG's management was asked this at the annual meeting and was quite coy about it. Thanks a lot. Yeah seemed kind of telegraphed to me, but I don't follow any of it all that closely. Just had it flagged to check in when (if) I see that announcement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DooDiligence Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 Interesting SA story from the POV of a developer turned FinTwit and more https://seekingalpha.com/amp/article/4080637-thrill-victory-worth-agony-defeat ;D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
merkhet Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 So when Sears says it intends to raise an additional $1 billion via RE sales this year (right?), you guys conclude it is likely that SRG will bid on that and if successful fund with a rights issue? Apparently, SRG's management was asked this at the annual meeting and was quite coy about it. This year or last? This year. Note that this is second hand information. I heard it from a friend this year during Berkshire who was in attendance at the SRG meeting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WneverLOSE Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 Let me ask a question: How was the Seritage portfolio initially selected among all of Sears and Kmart locations? Did Seritage get to cherry pick the better of the properties, or was there an objective criteria that resulted in this particular portfolio? from Bruce Berkowitz annual letter : Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LongTermView Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 NAREIT interview with Benjamin Schall. He blinks a lot: https://www.reit.com/news/videos/seritage-expected-approach-1-billion-new-development-year-end Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spekulatius Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 Interesting SA story from the POV of a developer turned FinTwit and more https://seekingalpha.com/amp/article/4080637-thrill-victory-worth-agony-defeat ;D Brad Thomas writes a lot of articles on Reits and most of his analysis is somewhat shallow, imo. He also recommended at some point to swap SRG for WPG (when WPG was much higher) and then later changed his opinion and put a sell on WPG. He has a sell on SRG because of Sears exposure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DooDiligence Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 Interesting SA story from the POV of a developer turned FinTwit and more https://seekingalpha.com/amp/article/4080637-thrill-victory-worth-agony-defeat ;D Brad Thomas writes a lot of articles on Reits and most of his analysis is somewhat shallow, imo. He also recommended at some point to swap SRG for WPG (when WPG was much higher) and then later changed his opinion and put a sell on WPG. He has a sell on SRG because of Sears exposure. Prob so. I found the discussion re: development & re-development over the decades to be informative (but then, I'm quite uninformed about the supporting real estate.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BTShine Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 For those that are actively bearish and those that stay away (or are agnostic to SRG) because of some concerns, what are your concerns or reasons to be bearish on SRG? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WneverLOSE Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 For those that are actively bearish and those that stay away (or are agnostic to SRG) because of some concerns, what are your concerns or reasons to be bearish on SRG? I own a bit of SRG but unlike most of the people here I don't expect phenomenal results, I expect 7% if things go not that great or 18% if all the stars align. I think the major reasons are : not being able to value the company with some sort of accuracy (impossible in my opinion), not liking the sector of retail property and being bearish on fixed or near fixed income assets such as bonds and real estate (due to macroeconomics views on interest rates and so on). edit : and of course the obvious one, Sears potential bankruptcy and SRG reliance on them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doughishere Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 Interesting SA story from the POV of a developer turned FinTwit and more https://seekingalpha.com/amp/article/4080637-thrill-victory-worth-agony-defeat ;D Very interesting that the argument here for the sears/srg anchors(auto centers?) is so that B&N("the original store just a block away") would find it attractive to move into as it downsize. Seems more like a consolidation. And it does kinda make sense.......The B&N did pretty much the same thing in my hometown a few years ago. I dont remember if it was a sears(probably not) but they did move into the mall. Still going to. I was back home and in there picking up a barrons on a weekend i was visiting. I as actually a little shocked how many people were in there.....no millennials but it was maybe half past 9 on a saturday or sunday morning. Edit: Sears owns that property. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doughishere Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 Sears also owns the one in lafyette, La and the one in bloomington, Il that CBL marks as T2. For what its worth. Is there a list of properties for SRG? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doughishere Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 Its strange because either theres like a "big short" CRE "wave of bankruptcies" (most of which is already priced in and sounds like its dependent on a Sears bankruptcy, according to the article) that ends in something like a massive(maybe too strong of a word) bailout of sears to effectively bail out the rest of CRE? I admit it sounds a bit dramatic. And then theres a narrative which is the exact opposite. Retail is not entirely dead instead its consolidating and that some of the properties have value. 1) This quote from the SA article. I mean he kinda says that hes still on the sidelines. Not the first time ive heard that before. SRG is kinda a running joke..."I like it but after the Sears bankruptcy." It’s clear that the REIT market is already pricing in a Sears bankruptcy that will leave many Mall REITs scrambling for cover. The Mall REITs with the most Sears exposure include PEI, CBL, WPG, and of course SRG… Trouble is still brewing, and whether it’s a secular or a cyclical shift, I don’t think it’s prudent to place any bets on CBL, WPG, or SRG until there is more clarity. 2) Seritage's CEOs comments from the NAREIT conference (h/t: LongTermView). basically saying that rents at old sears stores are going up. I quote: During the last 18 months, Seritage has leased almost 3 million square feet of space, Schall said. In the process, rent has increased from the Sears level of $4 per foot to $18 per foot https://www.reit.com/news/videos/seritage-expected-approach-1-billion-new-development-year-end 3) This press release from Sears a from May 25 saying the... executed $28 million of real estate sales out of over $700 million in bids received to date on over 60 properties http://www.reuters.com/article/brief-sears-presentation-executed-28-mln-idUSFWN1IR090 Could that be the end of the assets for Sears? And how many have they closed this year already? 4) And then there peripheral stuff like Buffett seems to believe in SRG it still. I Dont think hes sold has he? And some rather bullish articles in the WSJ recently. And I though I heard Aldi wanted to open up some new stores. And I think that Lone Pine also covered their sears short awhile back? What would happen if there was No Sears bankruptcy? No way that seems probable with all their bleeding. Edit: I mean what could a property like this one on Irving Park and North Ave in Chicago be worth to a developer? Thats a big piece of property. What does ackman(?) say "The parking lot." /s That property is in a pretty average american spot. It says median income is $55k. Which lines up with a quick google search. Here Look for yourself. https://shcrealestate.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doughishere Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 One last thing that was kinda haunting me, and im not 100% sure, but i think it was Buffett that said at the latest annual meeting that about 10% of their sales at Nebraska Furnatur Mart was online sales and store pickup. Which would be consistent with FRED.....Hardly the death of retail although it is of some concern. Edit: He did get out of Walmart. Clearly that chart is going to continue up and to the right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doughishere Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 One final disconnect. Didnt Charlie Munger say that Real Estate was the easiest to value because it had a cashflow and that everyone was in the game? Some story about the "Patels"? I didnt get that comment. And thats why he liked the stock market so much more? I think it was the latest DJCO meeting. Well now isnt there cashflow data associated with SRG? Here, source. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mephistopheles Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 I think the bigger risk with SRG is the supply/demand uncertainty with retail space, but so far that's been proven wrong. SHLD bankruptcy risk for SRG is remote. I don't see Lampert letting SHLD go bankrupt without first securing SRG. He's come this far burning the furniture to keep the fire alive, and lending SHLD his own money, why stop now and risk both companies? On the other hand, SRG is just a liquidity problem in the case of a SHLD bankruptcy. They can sell their JV's for instance and get the money for the short term to ramp up new leases if need be. Also most of the SHLD stores owned by SRG are EBITDAR positive (at least as of 2015 which I know is ages ago for this stat) so they probably wouldn't shut down even in a BK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doughishere Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 I think when he mentioned "the Patel's" he was taking about owner operators in the lodging space? Seems like being able to increase $/sq ft would be enticing (as a landlord/tenant?) There's so many ins & outs here... Enticing? They are already doing it before your very eyes. And people are already circling sears like sharks in the water. People want these properties. They WANT Sears to fail and sell those properties. Plaintiffs nonetheless alleged that (1) this transaction constituted self-dealing because ESL and Mr. Lampert effectively stood on “both sides of the deal” and, as a result, the court should review the transaction for entire fairness, and (2) the transaction was not entirely fair to Sears because the purchase price for its stores was $300 million too low. Plaintiffs also alleged that ESL, Mr. Lampert, Sears’ board, and Seritage (the last as an alleged aider and abettor) were jointly and severally liable to Sears for this purported $300 million shortfall. Chancery Court Suggests that Rights Offerings May Limit Liability in Transactions with Controlling Stockholders http://www.clearymawatch.com/2017/06/chancery-court-suggests-rights-offerings-may-limit-liability-transactions-controlling-stockholders/ So either the properties (SRGs and i guess according to bruce's presentation there shlds?) are a doughnut or everyone is fighting over the "Patel's" property and they are holding on to it as much as they can while ex-Sears properties are increasing in rent......I dont think it can be both? Edit: Plus what DooDoo said in the post before this one. And then you get the option of SWY....so in reality while everyone is making fun of SYW(the right hand?) SRG is actually delivering on higher rents(the left hand?) That sounds insane. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doughishere Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 Conventional wisdom in CRE right now would suggest you couldn't tell the difference between the below article and and onion article. I just dont get the disconnected between this and what SRG is doing and what SHLD is selling....well at least looking at offers on as of this moment. http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/manhattan/macy-herald-square-evacuated-dumpster-catches-fire-article-1.3243766?cid=bitly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doughishere Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 Why hasn't Sears been able to successfully run the Auto Centers? How hard can it be? I havent heard of anyone really putting figures on it to a lot of accuracy. But there was that Icahn deal recently and I dont think gas cars are going away in the near future. I mean maybe. But even then we know those properties have value or at least that guy on SA thought they were, how did he put it....."The Sears Auto store is the crown jewel site" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now