Jump to content

FELP - Foresight Energy


Picasso

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Monthly report on Fidelity holdings are out.

 

 

Fund      March 31st; February 29th

FNKLX  743k;          1021k

FEQIX  633k;            795k

FDESX  457k;            565k

VIPS    459k;            566k

FLMLX  110k;            155k

FEIRX    160k;            211k

FSESX  0;                  20k

 

So they started the year at 4.2 million shares, down to 3.3 million at end of February and down to 2.6 million at the end of March.  By my calculations they've just been sitting on 10% of trading volume and it's now their smallest position and they're the only large institutional owner.  They've gone from owning 22% of the float to 13% over those three months.  I think any stock with a 22% owner dumping down to 13% during a period of no liquidity and possible bankruptcy would kill the market price, which it obviously had/has.  We'll see where they end up at the end of April.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally don't invest in options anymore.  Too much of a brain drain trying to add an extra dimension of getting the timing and path right. 

 

But generally I think the volatility on SXCP and FELP are so high (plus they pay out massive distributions) that it makes it really hard to get any value on the options even though you have a high likelihood of seeing the stock prices move upwards.  Plus you could drive a truck through the bid/ask spread.

 

In the past I felt like my best options trades (when I wasted time on that kind of thing) were a combination of low volatility and severe under/overvaluation.  This is severe over/undervaluation but the options are expensive so it's not that great in my opinion...  Plus in the case of FELP there might be a rights offering over the next year and I'm not sure how that can affect your options trade.  A bit cleaner for SXCP.

 

Assuming about $75 million of DCF for 2016, there are only about 75 million common units when you include the PIK warrants.  So at least by owning FELP units I know that there's about $1 of DCF per common unit and it trades for $2.  I don't know if the market will reprice FELP to $5 immediately but as a unitholder I know that $1 of DCF is my piece of the earnings even though some of it might go towards debt repayment in the short term.

 

Anyway just my thoughts on that matter.  If you could get better pricing on FELP/SXCP options then it might make sense but I think it adds difficulty to an already messy investment...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As far as Fidelity goes, 12 million shares traded in April.  I also made a mistake.  Total trading volume was actually 4 million shares in March so Fidelity represented about 20% of average daily volume.  If they were still selling at 20%, then they are really close to being out.  Which is funny because it's coming up on the resolution fairly shortly.

 

Hopefully the resolution is a good one because it also coincides with the end of that big seller.  It will be pretty hard to buy a lot of shares without paying up at this point.  For that reason it could be one of those super orphaned securities that never really attracts institutional interest until the float expands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for your advice on the options.

 

This is a naive question, but regarding your comment about the possibility of this being an orphaned stock until the float expands, do you think a good resolution would still drive up the stock much? Are there enough small buyers to drive it to $3-5?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would think so, but that's going to be fairly unpredictable.  We've already seen two 50% upswings on a rumor and the senior lender agreement so I'd think getting the notes closer to par and 67% approval would provide further upside.  But I can't imagine working at a mutual fund and pitching the idea to go long FELP, even after the resolution.  It doesn't seem worth the reputational risk especially when you can't build up a large liquid stake.  I'm sure other participants in the market will start to price in the value of their cash flows.  It doesn't make a ton of sense for a stock to trade for $2 when it's earning $1.  At some point earnings get split into the subordinated shares but by then you've made more than your cost basis in distributions.  Maybe the market will miss that, who knows...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would think so, but that's going to be fairly unpredictable.  We've already seen two 50% upswings on a rumor and the senior lender agreement so I'd think getting the notes closer to par and 67% approval would provide further upside.  But I can't imagine working at a mutual fund and pitching the idea to go long FELP, even after the resolution.  It doesn't seem worth the reputational risk especially when you can't build up a large liquid stake.  I'm sure other participants in the market will start to price in the value of their cash flows.  It doesn't make a ton of sense for a stock to trade for $2 when it's earning $1.  At some point earnings get split into the subordinated shares but by then you've made more than your cost basis in distributions.  Maybe the market will miss that, who knows...

 

The question for me is how long it will take for those distributions to kick in again. People may wait to really bid up the shares until once there is more clarity on that point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am trying to find the scheduled earnings release.  I see it was on 5/8 last year but can't find any release for Q1 2016.  Any ideas on expected date for results?

 

Also, the daily trading volume from 7/1/2014 - 5/4/2016 averaged around 173k shares.  If you exclude 7 trading days from 4/13/16 - 4/21/16 when Fidelity was likely liquidating, it drops to 149k as there were several >1MM days in that 7 day period.  So far, this week we are dropping back closer to average daily trading volumes for last two years.  I personally hope that Fidelity is close to finished.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My understanding is that the actual note holder transaction agreement needs to be done by today, so they very likely already had the 67% but you need to create the legal agreement and such. So going down to the wire doesn't surprise me too much.

 

Also if you look at the jpegs from the support agreement, they were dated weeks before.  I don't think this is something where they didn't know they had 67% (i.e. slapped together last minute without negotiating with noteholders) especially when the last forebearance was for two weeks instead of one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...