RuleNumberOne Posted June 10, 2019 Share Posted June 10, 2019 I think hedonic "adjustment" was introduced in the late 1990s. My theory without examining any data is that these "adjustments" killed reported inflation. CPI manipulators can always find some quality improvement in autos, housing, and anything else. As smartphone, Internet bandwidth, laptop prices go down, they offset price increases in other areas. They can come up with any "coefficients" they need to peg inflation at 1.5%. The Fed keeps rates low in response and a great bubble gets inflated somewhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiveSigma Posted June 10, 2019 Share Posted June 10, 2019 See the following paper by BLS: https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2006/05/art2full.pdf "While hedonics is an important technique for particular categories, it is important to emphasize that it is used for only a small part of the total index. Moreover, research from the CPI-U Research Series (CPI-U-RS) shows that its impact on indexes often has been modest and of uncertain direction. The CPI-U-RS was created to provide a methodologically consistent index; to this end estimates were made of the quantitative index of methodological changes in the CPI since 1978.34 These included changes to quality adjustment procedures. The estimates in the research series are taken from simulations described in the research for each item category for which hedonics was implemented." "In table 5, a negative sign indicates that the change to hedonic adjustment has caused the index to rise more slowly (or decline more rapidly) than it would have if previous quality adjustment procedures had been used. The inconsistency of the effect is exemplified by the fact that the impacts for washers and dryers have the opposite sign. While the switch to hedonic adjustment had a significant effect on several of the individual item categories, it is important to note that the net effect on the All Items index was negligible. This is because the direction of these effects varied and the items in question had such a small weight. (The total relative importance of items for which hedonics have been implemented since 1998 is less than 1 percent.) Indeed, the net effect of hedonics from 1999 onward (which excludes personal computers, but includes televisions and all later categories) on the All Items index is estimated to be less than 1-hundredth of 1 percent per year, specifically +0.005 percent." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now