Even with Merchants Bank, it was secondary market lending that really drove their results. Between PPP loan volume and Secondary Market loans, this drove regional banks much more than the mega banks.
@Cigarbutt@TwoCitiesCapital@thepupil@JuntoThanks everyone for your insights, I really appreciate your commentary. I did not realize that I was extrapolating results to such an extent, you're absolutely right. I'm curious though as to why thepupil and Junto believe that the ROE will return back to what it was before their was a boost in mortgage banking and secondary market loans (I understand that the PPP loans will dry up though). If they stay at today's levels, shouldn't these banks NIM and ROE stay at around today's levels or even increase in a few years with the anticipated increase in interest rates? Thanks in advance, looking forward to hearing your ideas!
I don't have any insight and haven't looked into the companies. Just gave them a 5 minute look to see why their ROE inflected to much higher from the prior years.
In general, mortgage banking is quite cyclical given refi volumes are related to the refi incentive (difference between current rates and rates that mortgage borrowers have) as well as home purchase volume. But again, I haven't looked into any of these specific names.
I'll add that in normal times, globally systemically important banks have higher capital requirements which reduce ROE. Ultimately ROCE looks a little better when GSIBs issue preferred stock.
The higher capital requirements also provide higher buffer for absorbing losses.
You have to decide for yourself if you want to be leveraged 10x or 15-20x.
The latter might give you higher ROE but also arguably at higher risk of loss of capital.
That said, leverage is not the only risk. There are also other big risks, e.g. what assets banks have, what other risky activities they are exposing themselves to, interest-rate risk, credit quality risk, etc.. So, you could still have a big bank with high risk.
Overall, I'd rather play it safe with low leverage and also lower other risks, especially when risk/reward will be multiplied by 10-20x.
Recommended Posts
Junto
Even with Merchants Bank, it was secondary market lending that really drove their results. Between PPP loan volume and Secondary Market loans, this drove regional banks much more than the mega banks.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ContrarianValue44
@Cigarbutt @TwoCitiesCapital @thepupil@JuntoThanks everyone for your insights, I really appreciate your commentary. I did not realize that I was extrapolating results to such an extent, you're absolutely right. I'm curious though as to why thepupil and Junto believe that the ROE will return back to what it was before their was a boost in mortgage banking and secondary market loans (I understand that the PPP loans will dry up though). If they stay at today's levels, shouldn't these banks NIM and ROE stay at around today's levels or even increase in a few years with the anticipated increase in interest rates? Thanks in advance, looking forward to hearing your ideas!
Link to comment
Share on other sites
thepupil
I don't have any insight and haven't looked into the companies. Just gave them a 5 minute look to see why their ROE inflected to much higher from the prior years.
In general, mortgage banking is quite cyclical given refi volumes are related to the refi incentive (difference between current rates and rates that mortgage borrowers have) as well as home purchase volume. But again, I haven't looked into any of these specific names.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ContrarianValue44
Great thanks, I really appreciate the explanation!
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CapriciousCapital
I'll add that in normal times, globally systemically important banks have higher capital requirements which reduce ROE. Ultimately ROCE looks a little better when GSIBs issue preferred stock.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LearningMachine
The higher capital requirements also provide higher buffer for absorbing losses.
You have to decide for yourself if you want to be leveraged 10x or 15-20x.
The latter might give you higher ROE but also arguably at higher risk of loss of capital.
That said, leverage is not the only risk. There are also other big risks, e.g. what assets banks have, what other risky activities they are exposing themselves to, interest-rate risk, credit quality risk, etc.. So, you could still have a big bank with high risk.
Overall, I'd rather play it safe with low leverage and also lower other risks, especially when risk/reward will be multiplied by 10-20x.
Edited by LearningMachineLink to comment
Share on other sites
ContrarianValue44
Thanks for the help and feedback everyone, it is greatly appreciated!
Link to comment
Share on other sites