farnamstreet Posted March 18, 2010 Share Posted March 18, 2010 In this blog post I draw on the examiner's report to walk through what happened with illustrative examples of how the balance sheet changes depending on (1) the classification of repos (financing or sale) and (2) what Lehman did with the cash (nothing or repurchase debt). http://bit.ly/akobQB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rabbitisrich Posted March 18, 2010 Share Posted March 18, 2010 It's really an incredible story and one that will be difficult to defend. The report makes clear that the technical propriety of the sale treatment does not affect the impropriety of non-disclosure. In a fair world, Ernst and Young would face severe penalties, far in excess of what they earned from Lehman since 2001, for their aid. Also interesting is the fact that no American law firm would sign off on the transactions, so Lehman simply used a British legal team to sign off for Lehman's London division. From what I have read, and I'm no accountant, no amount to careful reading would have allowed a Lehman investor to pick up on the 105 and 108 transactions. It's just a part of Lehman's downfall, but it speaks to the character of management. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now