txlaw Posted April 15, 2010 Share Posted April 15, 2010 http://online.wsj.com/article/SB20001424052702304798204575183743131019082.html So we have Brookfield and Fairholme vs. Simon and Paulson & Co. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
txlaw Posted April 15, 2010 Author Share Posted April 15, 2010 Oh, forgot to include Pershing Square as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcollon Posted April 23, 2010 Share Posted April 23, 2010 Here's a recent letter from Fairholme: April 22, 2010 Mr. Adam Metz Chief Executive Officer General Growth Properties, Inc. 110 North Wacker Drive Chicago, Illinois 60606 Dear Adam, There have been some rumors about our intentions, so please allow me to reiterate that Fairholme is not willing to invest in GGP if equity ownership is concentrated in the hands of Simon Property Group ("SPG"), passive or not. Our concern is not antitrust or execution risk. We are not experts in those areas. We simply find the value proposition for the public float unsupportable assuming successful execution of anything like the SPG proposal. We continue to support a stand-alone GGP and hope for a long-term relationship. Do not hesitate to call if I can be of assistance. With kind regards, Bruce R. Berkowitz Founder and Managing Member Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now