watsa_is_a_randian_hero Posted August 22, 2010 Share Posted August 22, 2010 Which one or two of the merger arb trades do you like best? Please explain your VXX trade. Not to excited about any particular merger trades right now...those are all lower return trades. I've been short VXX since 28. (1) Vix is mean reverting, and it is not a matter of if it goes back to its historical average in teens, but it is a matter of WHEN. It will go to 15 again at some point. VIX of 30 is definitely much higher than historical average and unsustainable (2) VXX is long VIX futures. Typically futures curve for VIX is upward sloping, and therefore every month when VXX roles its futures the ETF loses money. Essentially, the ETF was designed to fail. 2nd trade I did on VXX involves just selling out-of-money calls each month. If VIX jumps again I'll just role forward until it falls back down. Thanks. Have been thinking for some time about the very same VXX trade for the same reasons. However, I would only want to do this if I could minimize the unpleasant aspects of shorting. Puts are the usual way we limit risk, but puts on VXX seem too pricey for us. Your idea of selling out of the money calls on the forward month looks good. Are they usually selling at about the same implied volatility as comparable puts? Or are they not usually nearly as pricey? There is always the possibility the trade could go against a short position, but here as an index that is mean reverting, it seems that the range is much more definite than with a stock that can often go up 10 times or more with a short squeeze or bubble. Could this risk be limited by sequestering the trade in a separate account that would limit the possible loss? Or do all margin agreements make the account holder liable beyond what's in a particular account if the value of that account is insufficient to meet a margin call? The other question is practical , the availability of shares in the VXX for shorting. It seems like this would be a popular trade and that it might be difficult to borrow shares at a reasonable price. Or is this no problem with this ETF? You said "we"/"us" above...are you referring to a company your with? Private fund? I have a Reg D Rule 506 exempt fund I set up for friends/family. About 1.5 million AUM right now. These are all of the trades currently in that fund. Because it is mean reverting, I am not worried about if it spikes and I'm short; it will go back down eventually. It does not constitute a large position, and the portfolio has plenty of excess liquidity / margin capacity. I'm selling $30 strike calls on VXX, which is equivalent to VXX 33. The trade has a lot of daily P&L volatility, but low real long term risk because of the mean-reverting nature of VIX, and the unlikelyhood of some paradigm shift from 15-20 being the range that VIX reverts to, to a new range greater than 33. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twacowfca Posted August 22, 2010 Share Posted August 22, 2010 Which one or two of the merger arb trades do you like best? Please explain your VXX trade. Not to excited about any particular merger trades right now...those are all lower return trades. I've been short VXX since 28. (1) Vix is mean reverting, and it is not a matter of if it goes back to its historical average in teens, but it is a matter of WHEN. It will go to 15 again at some point. VIX of 30 is definitely much higher than historical average and unsustainable (2) VXX is long VIX futures. Typically futures curve for VIX is upward sloping, and therefore every month when VXX roles its futures the ETF loses money. Essentially, the ETF was designed to fail. 2nd trade I did on VXX involves just selling out-of-money calls each month. If VIX jumps again I'll just role forward until it falls back down. Thanks. Have been thinking for some time about the very same VXX trade for the same reasons. However, I would only want to do this if I could minimize the unpleasant aspects of shorting. Puts are the usual way we limit risk, but puts on VXX seem too pricey for us. Your idea of selling out of the money calls on the forward month looks good. Are they usually selling at about the same implied volatility as comparable puts? Or are they not usually nearly as pricey? There is always the possibility the trade could go against a short position, but here as an index that is mean reverting, it seems that the range is much more definite than with a stock that can often go up 10 times or more with a short squeeze or bubble. Could this risk be limited by sequestering the trade in a separate account that would limit the possible loss? Or do all margin agreements make the account holder liable beyond what's in a particular account if the value of that account is insufficient to meet a margin call? The other question is practical , the availability of shares in the VXX for shorting. It seems like this would be a popular trade and that it might be difficult to borrow shares at a reasonable price. Or is this no problem with this ETF? You said "we"/"us" above...are you referring to a company your with? Private fund? I have a Reg D Rule 506 exempt fund I set up for friends/family. About 1.5 million AUM right now. These are all of the trades currently in that fund. Because it is mean reverting, I am not worried about if it spikes and I'm short; it will go back down eventually. It does not constitute a large position, and the portfolio has plenty of excess liquidity / margin capacity. I'm selling $30 strike calls on VXX, which is equivalent to VXX 33. The trade has a lot of daily P&L volatility, but low real long term risk because of the mean-reverting nature of VIX, and the unlikelyhood of some paradigm shift from 15-20 being the range that VIX reverts to, to a new range greater than 33. The "we" means that there are sometimes fiduciary obligations, involving BOD's, in addition to personal and charitable funds as well as more than one individual involved in the investment process. Almost everything is family related. We don't have outside funds under management. A few friends ask for advice, but they make their own decisions. The investment community we deal with thinks we know what we're doing, and there is great flexibility to go just about anywhere and buy just about anything from anybody. We can also be very concentrated, without having to follow conventional rules of diversification which drags down returns under a false cloak of security. However, this is just a small, family related organization. Our flexibility means that a type of investment that might be unsuitable in one account may be perfectly fine in another. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bookie71 Posted August 23, 2010 Share Posted August 23, 2010 FBAK LUK BRK.A BRK.B Fairfax DJCO FRS LOJN :'( WSC & CASH Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ericd1 Posted August 23, 2010 Share Posted August 23, 2010 Basket of financial PFDs, PGF and bond funds - PHK, PFN, PTY FFH Emgr Mkts ETFs - EWZ (Brazil), BKF (BRIC), RSX (Russia), EMF, EEM China coal - YZC, PUDC Energy - SU, BBEP, EVEP, MLPL (2x AMJ) Infrastructure - BGC Bank/Finance - WFC, NICK, NBG, GLAD, ,PNNT Tech - ARAY, NVEC, BYDDF Ship/Trans - SSW, TRBR, TRMD, FLY Misc - LUK, GCE, PRM, GE Leaps, Rare earth mining basket Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
watsa_is_a_randian_hero Posted August 23, 2010 Share Posted August 23, 2010 The "we" means that there are sometimes fiduciary obligations, involving BOD's, in addition to personal and charitable funds as well as more than one individual involved in the investment process. Almost everything is family related. We don't have outside funds under management. A few friends ask for advice, but they make their own decisions. The investment community we deal with thinks we know what we're doing, and there is great flexibility to go just about anywhere and buy just about anything from anybody. We can also be very concentrated, without having to follow conventional rules of diversification which drags down returns under a false cloak of security. However, this is just a small, family related organization. Our flexibility means that a type of investment that might be unsuitable in one account may be perfectly fine in another. I like the flexibility. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevieY Posted August 23, 2010 Share Posted August 23, 2010 Watsa is a Randian, Just curious as to why you are short UA? That seems a little too dangerous to me! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Partner24 Posted August 23, 2010 Share Posted August 23, 2010 My positions: FFH BAM SHLD LUK MKL BH Bidvest BYD MCF LRE EBIX Some gold companies related to Robert Mcewen Hi Christopher, there is a lot of interesting "jockey stocks" in that list. I think that's the first time that I hear someone who own shares of Bidvest, one of the most undercovered success story that I know. I've owned shares of that company since a few years now. Where did you hear about that company? Cheers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christopher1 Posted August 23, 2010 Share Posted August 23, 2010 Hi Partner, I feel very close to your ideas about jockey stocks, the only difference maybe is that I use a greater level of diversification. I try to stick with these stocks (if I'm fortunte I can find one jokey stock per year) in order to know them very well and try to arbitrage their relative under/over valuation mantaining a core position in each stock and allocationg the excess cash in the cheapest stocks in the portfolio. Regarding Bidvest, I heard about them in 2006 from a frind of mine living in Cape Town. He told me that in South Africa existed an extraordinary company lead by Brian Joffe that had compounded its value more than 30% for 15 plus years in a very consistent way adopting the same decentralized model of Warren Buffett. And in South Africa the range of products that Bidvest sell is really wide. From their history I think that Joffe goal of achieving a target of 30% ROE and 50% Return on average funds employed is a high probability event, so I hope that Bidvest investment will be fine. Best regards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rmitz Posted August 23, 2010 Share Posted August 23, 2010 ATSG (Largest) BRK.B (Common and 2012 LEAPs) FBK (Recent) PVD (Have owned twice since 2006--picked it up this time in March 09) LRE BRFS TPL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packer16 Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 Largest Stakes SALM SGA FFH MGAM NRG ACME LNET SURW LICT SSW FUR Petrobank SOQ Smaller Stakes SKM ICO Packer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
watsa_is_a_randian_hero Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 Watsa is a Randian, Just curious as to why you are short UA? That seems a little too dangerous to me! Stock is trading VERY high PE relative to others like Nike. UA's original product (that dry-fit stuff) is copied by everyone now. UA is running out of room to expand into. Also, notice almost all my shorts are related to consumer discretionary - I think **IF** we double-dip, consumer discretionary will be the hardest-hit sector. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
watsa_is_a_randian_hero Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 ATSG (Largest) BRK.B (Common and 2012 LEAPs) FBK (Recent) PVD (Have owned twice since 2006--picked it up this time in March 09) LRE BRFS TPL I also own PVD. I think I found out about this based on posts on this board??? May have been you??? I like the moat of the business. Chile is growing fast (some say its very overheated), but long term should be solid. I picked up around 46. Earlier this year. At 54 now, +$3 dividend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Myth465 Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 ATSG (Largest) BRK.B (Common and 2012 LEAPs) FBK (Recent) PVD (Have owned twice since 2006--picked it up this time in March 09) LRE BRFS TPL I also own PVD. I think I found out about this based on posts on this board??? May have been you??? I like the moat of the business. Chile is growing fast (some say its very overheated), but long term should be solid. I picked up around 46. Earlier this year. At 54 now, +$3 dividend. I think Harry brought it up first. I plan to look into it and EBIX a bit more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T-bone1 Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 ELNK FTR PDLI CIM FBK.to FFH.to CHK SD SENEA HDNG SPMD 2012 Leaps on MHP and KGC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rmitz Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 I also own PVD. I think I found out about this based on posts on this board??? May have been you??? I like the moat of the business. Chile is growing fast (some say its very overheated), but long term should be solid. I picked up around 46. Earlier this year. At 54 now, +$3 dividend. Nope, wasn't me. I'd never discussed the company here before. I think I bought originally around $24, and sold around $40 to raise capital during the downturn. Of course there were dividends in there too. I re-bought at $15 during March 09. I'm not totally convinced it's a great investment at these levels. The reason I continue holding is that with the basis so low, I figure sitting on the dividend generating power is totally adequate. It's also not a large position, and I'm pretty sure that we won't see that kind of price again (unless the company itself is having bigger problems). That said, I should be doing a valuation to determine when I would need to sell. I do also appreciate the Chilean economy, and think they are the best place in South America to be doing business. My original thesis for PVD was definitely tied to the anticipated bright future of Chile, as a way to get involved in a foreign economy without being in an index fund. On the drawbacks, there are some structural benefits to PVD in particular that can change over time, and the actual earnings of the company are significantly tied with overall market performance. I was a little surprised by that last time, but I don't think they would be in the situation of the company itself being at risk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ericd1 Posted September 19, 2010 Share Posted September 19, 2010 I did a rough recap of the companies listed...There were 12 stocks, or options in three, or more portfolios. The average return of these top 12 have out-performed the market by a nice margin over YTD, 3 Yr, 5 Yr and 10 Yr. Here are top 13 BRK 14, FFH 13, JNJ 8, KFT 6, SD 4, SSW 4, BAM 3, Dell 3, LUK 3, PVD 3, SHLD 3, XOM 3 Top 13 Avg - YTD 4.6%, 1 Yr 7.2%, 3 Yr -4.6%, 5 Yr 3.2%, 10 Yr 8.7% S&P 500 - YTD 2.4%, 1 Yr 7.8%, 3 Yr -6.6%, 5 Yr 0.2, 10 Yr -0.8 The favorites BRK & FFH quite a bit better better Top 2 Avg - YTD 14.5%, 1 Yr 15.9%, 3 Yr 10.1%, 5 Yr 14.9%, 10 Yr 10.4% The numbers speak for themselves... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rmitz Posted September 19, 2010 Share Posted September 19, 2010 I did a rough recap of the companies listed...There were 12 stocks, or options in three, or more portfolios. The average return of these top 12 have out-performed the market by a nice margin over YTD, 3 Yr, 5 Yr and 10 Yr. Here are top 13 BRK 14, FFH 13, JNJ 8, KFT 6, SD 4, SSW 4, BAM 3, Dell 3, LUK 3, PVD 3, SHLD 3, XOM 3 Top 13 Avg - YTD 4.6%, 1 Yr 7.2%, 3 Yr -4.6%, 5 Yr 3.2%, 10 Yr 8.7% S&P 500 - YTD 2.4%, 1 Yr 7.8%, 3 Yr -6.6%, 5 Yr 0.2, 10 Yr -0.8 The favorites BRK & FFH quite a bit better better Top 2 Avg - YTD 14.5%, 1 Yr 15.9%, 3 Yr 10.1%, 5 Yr 14.9%, 10 Yr 10.4% The numbers speak for themselves... This is kind of an apples and oranges comparison. With the later stocks, timing is everything in terms of the investment value. With FFH and BRK, timing is important, but their longevity can make up for buying mistakes over time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oec2000 Posted September 19, 2010 Share Posted September 19, 2010 The numbers speak for themselves... I'm not saying it is the case but the numbers could also be the result of investing with rearview mirrors (i.e. money chasing performance). Given the nature of this board, it is less likely but we have to be careful with statistics. If we could find an old thread like this and then check for the performance since, the results would be more convincing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh4580 Posted September 20, 2010 Share Posted September 20, 2010 The last thread like this was on July 20th, 2009 located here: http://cornerofberkshireandfairfax.ca/forum/index.php?topic=870.0 My positions than: 26% GGWPQ ($4.78 to $15: up 214%) 22% MCF ($51.06 to $47.22: down 7.5%) 20% SNS ($235.4 to $330: up 40%) 15% Cash 10% SFK ($.71 to $.93: up 31%) 8% TXCOQ -100% S&P 500 up 8% since sept 30, 2009 Current Positions AAG.TO ATPG DJSP EXXI FBK.TO GYRO HAWK KIRK LALLF & WLK MBRKQ MDT MHH MMPIQ MON MYGN PRXI RVX.TO TRXAQ/TRXBQ Short SMH Short IYR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jasonw1 Posted September 20, 2010 Share Posted September 20, 2010 I believe it's the first time DJSP is mentioned on this board. I also hold DJSP and think it's cheap, and it's also a good hedge on job and economy won't be getting any better soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elltel Posted September 20, 2010 Share Posted September 20, 2010 just wondering if anyone owns anything in the UK? Is anyone (apart from me) based in the UK? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Myth465 Posted September 20, 2010 Share Posted September 20, 2010 I have HAWK and HERO on my watch list. I think they will either be big duds or you will make out like a bandit. My problem is there rigs will be the last back to work and the first to be stacked. The new rules regarding plugging wells should be good for them. I am heavy into Oil and Gas. I own. SD ATPG DVR ESV ATSG L FUR FTR LNET SSW FBK LRE TRXBQ - a small bit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smazz Posted September 20, 2010 Share Posted September 20, 2010 Rim - trading stock - last week - have held many times before Al, whats your current take on Rim? Ive never had it on my "investment" radar - just as a piece of interest type thing but see its trading somewhat like a "normal" company as premiums to sales and earnings etc etc but with no debt - WOW! From the little I know I feel they have a bit of market share but this is REALLY out of my area of expertise (I dont even own a blackberry or Iphone HA) I believe there was talk on Rimm in a thread here a while back but I think it was buried in a thread of a different subject? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keerthiprasad Posted September 20, 2010 Share Posted September 20, 2010 Recently sold a few holdings, but still own: FFH SHLD ISIS ATSG Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beerbaron Posted September 21, 2010 Share Posted September 21, 2010 Rim - trading stock - last week - have held many times before Al, whats your current take on Rim? Ive never had it on my "investment" radar - just as a piece of interest type thing but see its trading somewhat like a "normal" company as premiums to sales and earnings etc etc but with no debt - WOW! From the little I know I feel they have a bit of market share but this is REALLY out of my area of expertise (I dont even own a blackberry or Iphone HA) I believe there was talk on Rimm in a thread here a while back but I think it was buried in a thread of a different subject? Jim Balsillie has been unloading so many shares in the 80-60$ range it's quite scary. Aren't you affraid when the most knowleadgeable insider sells massively? BeerBaron Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now