Liberty Posted September 9, 2014 Share Posted September 9, 2014 http://www.theonion.com/articles/bank-of-america-introduces-new-50-underdraft-fee,36881/ :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ERICOPOLY Posted September 10, 2014 Share Posted September 10, 2014 The impact for BAC could be less than 2% or may be even 1%.WSJ says that the surcharge could be 2% over the Basel requirement but then will depend upon the short term funding. If the requirement would be 2% for GS, it would be less than 2% for deposit banks. Again we do not the timing of the implementation of the new requirements. It could be 2019 like Basel requirement. A 2% surcharge would take BAC to a 10.5% fully-phased-in Basel3 ratio. They should be hitting that under "Standardized" approach roughly by end of Q1 2015 (or perhaps end of Q4'14 under the "Advanced" approach). So in theory they would still be able to return all of the capital they generate beyond that point. The trouble is "that point" just keeps getting kicked further and further down the road. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redskin Posted September 10, 2014 Share Posted September 10, 2014 New presentation today.... http://investor.bankofamerica.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=71595&p=irol-EventDetails&EventId=5168654#fbid=jbLuIrZGw6f Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xazp Posted September 11, 2014 Share Posted September 11, 2014 CFO was asked about it today. And his response sounds right. The most strict constraint is probably still CCAR, so the fact that the maximum might get raised doesn't impact very much. CCAR is the limiting factor on capital returns so that's what counts. A 2% surcharge would take BAC to a 10.5% fully-phased-in Basel3 ratio. They should be hitting that under "Standardized" approach roughly by end of Q1 2015 (or perhaps end of Q4'14 under the "Advanced" approach). So in theory they would still be able to return all of the capital they generate beyond that point. The trouble is "that point" just keeps getting kicked further and further down the road. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OracleofCarolina Posted September 16, 2014 Share Posted September 16, 2014 http://investor.bankofamerica.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=71595&p=irol-irhome#fbid=2EMGq7PG5y9 mid-cycle stress test results out tonight Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meiroy Posted September 16, 2014 Share Posted September 16, 2014 http://investor.bankofamerica.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=71595&p=irol-irhome#fbid=2EMGq7PG5y9 mid-cycle stress test results out tonight In one of the more closely followed numbers Monday, Citigroup predicted that its so-called Tier 1 common ratio would fall to 8.4% if a severe recession were to take place over the next two years. The projected ratio—which measures financial strength by comparing a bank's high-quality capital with its risk-weighted assets—was 9.1% under the bank's own stress test last year. Meanwhile, J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. said its capital levels under a hypothetical economic downturn would be 8.4%, down from an 8.5% projection a year ago. Morgan Stanley MS +0.57% projected its ratio would fall to 8.9% in a harsh recession, down from a 9.5% projection last year. Goldman projected its ratio would be 10.1%, compared with an 8.9% projection last year. Wells Fargo WFC +0.46% & Co., meanwhile, projected its ratio would be 9.6%, compared with a 9.9% projection last year. Bank of America Corp. BAC -0.30% on Monday predicted it would have the same capital level—8.4%—under a stressed scenario as it did last year. Under the latest scenario however, the Charlotte, N.C., lender created a tougher hypothetical recession for itself on certain fronts. For instance, Bank of America's latest adverse scenario features a U.S. economy with home prices declining 25%, compared with a 21% predicted drop a year ago. It also includes a 5.9% decline in Eurozone real GDP, compared with a 5% decline in the year-ago scenario. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Dufresne Posted September 16, 2014 Share Posted September 16, 2014 BAC report out - here is a quote of the summary (I stressed the results in red) from p. 6 of the presentation - see here: http://phx.corporate-ir.net/External.File?item=UGFyZW50SUQ9NTU1MTEwfENoaWxkSUQ9MjUxNjI3fFR5cGU9MQ==&t=1 BHC Severely Adverse – BAC Results A $36.4B cumulative pre-tax loss was projected over the specified nine-quarter horizon under the BHC Severely Adverse scenario. • Material impacts to earnings included loan and lease losses ($28.1B), incremental build in allowance for loan and lease losses ($12.0B), trading and counterparty losses ($16.5B), goodwill impairment ($5.1B which are excluded from regulatory capital) and other losses ($6.2B), partially offset by $31.3B of PPNR and other revenues of $0.6B. • Due to the impact of the hypothetical pre-tax losses, the deferred tax asset (“DTA”) increased, resulting in a higher disallowed DTA which reduced capital and capital ratios. • Risk-weighted assets declined primarily driven by a reduction in credit risk-weighted assets resulting from reduced loan demand consistent with the severely adverse macroeconomic conditions of the scenario, partially offset by an increase in market risk-weighted assets resulting from the stressed market and economic conditions. • The Basel 1 Tier 1 Common Capital ratio declined from 10.8% at March 31, 2014 to an estimate in the BHC Severely Adverse scenario of 8.4% at its lowest point and 9.0% at June 30, 2016. • Under Basel 3 Transition, the estimated lowest stress ratios over the nine-quarter horizon for Common Equity Tier 1 Capital, Tier 1 Capital, Total Capital and Tier 1 Leverage were 8.2%, 8.5%, 10.7% and 5.5%, respectively. • BAC maintains capital above required regulatory minimums in all baseline and stress scenarios under both Basel 1 and Basel 3 Standardized Transition (“B3S”) rules. The required regulatory minimums are provided for reference on page 18. • Global Excess Liquidity Sources increased in the BHC Severely Adverse scenario from $426.7B at March 31, 2014 to $462.7B at June 30, 2016, primarily due to an increase in bank liquidity. Parent liquidity declined from $94.7B at March 31, 2014 to $57.9B at June 30, 2016 and resulted in a time to required funding (“TTF”) decline from 35 months to 21 months. B Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fareastwarriors Posted September 16, 2014 Share Posted September 16, 2014 BofA loses $6 billion in consumer-friendly cuts http://www.cnbc.com/id/102005575?trknav=homestack:topnews:4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PLynchJr Posted September 19, 2014 Share Posted September 19, 2014 For those of you with overly large BAC positions...at what point will you start lightening up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jay21 Posted September 19, 2014 Share Posted September 19, 2014 For those of you with overly large BAC positions...at what point will you start lightening up? Probably either too early or too late... But in seriousness, I promised myself to take a long look when it crosses $20 as I think once you start getting past BV you are betting on the BoA franchise, which I thought was there when I initiated. Obviously, I am always monitoring, but I basically want to start my analysis from scratch when it crosses BV. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rkbabang Posted September 19, 2014 Share Posted September 19, 2014 For those of you with overly large BAC positions...at what point will you start lightening up? Probably either too early or too late... But in seriousness, I promised myself to take a long look when it crosses $20 as I think once you start getting past BV you are betting on the BoA franchise, which I thought was there when I initiated. Obviously, I am always monitoring, but I basically want to start my analysis from scratch when it crosses BV. Book value has been my target as well. I still plan on holding BAC for a long time, but not as large a position as I have now and not as leveraged. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fareastwarriors Posted September 19, 2014 Share Posted September 19, 2014 Big Banks Poised to Ride Rising Rate Tide http://online.wsj.com/articles/big-banks-poised-to-ride-rising-rate-tide-heard-on-the-street-1411072223 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Straddle Posted September 19, 2014 Share Posted September 19, 2014 For those of you with overly large BAC positions...at what point will you start lightening up? Not below BVPS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EliG Posted September 20, 2014 Share Posted September 20, 2014 Very bullish article in Barron's http://online.barrons.com/news/articles/SB52133021052493823286804580156162026584340 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
longtermdave Posted September 20, 2014 Share Posted September 20, 2014 Very bullish article in Barron's http://online.barrons.com/news/articles/SB52133021052493823286804580156162026584340 This part was interesting: Goldman notes that while consolidation has already run its course among big U.S. banks, remaining players are moving out of business lines where their share is low and focusing on ones where they dominate, which has the same effect as mergers: reducing competition and driving profits higher. It sees BofA as underowned; its weighting in mutual funds relative to its weighting in the Standard & Poor's 500 index is the second lowest among 25 large financials, ahead of only Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mankap Posted September 25, 2014 Share Posted September 25, 2014 BAC would have saved Billions had they waited couple of weeks for Eric Holders resignation. But I think it was right thing to settle and move on Holder’s departure signals end of big mortgage cases Sep 25 2014, 15:09 ET | By: Carl Surran, SA News Editor Contact this editor with comments or a news tip Today's resignation of Attorney General Eric Holder could mark the beginning of the end of the Justice Department’s push to hold big banks accountable for their conduct leading up to the financial crisis.Several big banks, including Goldman Sachs (GS -2.1%) and Wells Fargo (WFC -1.1%), are still under investigations by the Justice Department for their sale of flawed mortgage securities before 2008, but settlements in those cases are expected to be much smaller than the big sums extracted from Bank of America (BAC -1.8%), JPMorgan Chase (JPM -2%) and Citigroup (C -2.2%).Another sign that the big bank cases may be winding down: Tony West, who was Holder’s point man in the bank settlement talks, recently left the Justice Department to join PepsiCo as its general counsel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xazp Posted September 25, 2014 Share Posted September 25, 2014 I think that's backwards. I think holder was waiting for bac to settle before he resigned. BAC would have saved Billions had they waited couple of weeks for Eric Holders resignation. But I think it was right thing to settle and move on Holder’s departure signals end of big mortgage cases Sep 25 2014, 15:09 ET | By: Carl Surran, SA News Editor Contact this editor with comments or a news tip Today's resignation of Attorney General Eric Holder could mark the beginning of the end of the Justice Department’s push to hold big banks accountable for their conduct leading up to the financial crisis.Several big banks, including Goldman Sachs (GS -2.1%) and Wells Fargo (WFC -1.1%), are still under investigations by the Justice Department for their sale of flawed mortgage securities before 2008, but settlements in those cases are expected to be much smaller than the big sums extracted from Bank of America (BAC -1.8%), JPMorgan Chase (JPM -2%) and Citigroup (C -2.2%).Another sign that the big bank cases may be winding down: Tony West, who was Holder’s point man in the bank settlement talks, recently left the Justice Department to join PepsiCo as its general counsel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
txlaw Posted September 25, 2014 Share Posted September 25, 2014 I think that's backwards. I think holder was waiting for bac to settle before he resigned. BAC would have saved Billions had they waited couple of weeks for Eric Holders resignation. But I think it was right thing to settle and move on Holder’s departure signals end of big mortgage cases Sep 25 2014, 15:09 ET | By: Carl Surran, SA News Editor Contact this editor with comments or a news tip Today's resignation of Attorney General Eric Holder could mark the beginning of the end of the Justice Department’s push to hold big banks accountable for their conduct leading up to the financial crisis.Several big banks, including Goldman Sachs (GS -2.1%) and Wells Fargo (WFC -1.1%), are still under investigations by the Justice Department for their sale of flawed mortgage securities before 2008, but settlements in those cases are expected to be much smaller than the big sums extracted from Bank of America (BAC -1.8%), JPMorgan Chase (JPM -2%) and Citigroup (C -2.2%).Another sign that the big bank cases may be winding down: Tony West, who was Holder’s point man in the bank settlement talks, recently left the Justice Department to join PepsiCo as its general counsel. Yeah, I'd agree with that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liberty Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2014/09/29/bank-of-america-settles-s-e-c-case-on-4-billion-accounting-error/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nodnub Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2014/09/29/bank-of-america-settles-s-e-c-case-on-4-billion-accounting-error/ For a minute I thought it said "agreed to pay 7.65 Billion to settle charges". I guess I am conditioned to expect billion dollar settlements for every damn thing :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rohitc99 Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2014/09/29/bank-of-america-settles-s-e-c-case-on-4-billion-accounting-error/ For a minute I thought it said "agreed to pay 7.65 Billion to settle charges". I guess I am conditioned to expect billion dollar settlements for every damn thing :) maybe the bank even offered to pay 7.65 Bn, then realized that it was only millions being asked. whats a billion here, billion there :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fareastwarriors Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 Bank of America Board Gives Chairman Job to Brian Moynihan Chad Holliday, BofA's Previous Chairman, to Stay on Board http://online.wsj.com/articles/bank-of-america-board-gives-chairman-job-to-brian-moynihan-1412196657?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTWhatsNewsCollection Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grenville Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 Bank of America Board Gives Chairman Job to Brian Moynihan Chad Holliday, BofA's Previous Chairman, to Stay on Board http://online.wsj.com/articles/bank-of-america-board-gives-chairman-job-to-brian-moynihan-1412196657?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTWhatsNewsCollection Gets my thumbs up. I can't say I agree with everything Brian has done, but his background and work since taking over has gotten BAC pretty far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fareastwarriors Posted October 6, 2014 Share Posted October 6, 2014 American Banks Stockpile Treasuries as Deposits Top Loans http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-10-05/america-s-banks-pile-up-treasuries-as-deposits-overwhelm-lending.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZenaidaMacroura Posted October 7, 2014 Share Posted October 7, 2014 Berkowitz... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q3v0-jKxUG0 Says it's private, anyone have a link to any of berkowitz recent talk? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now