Jump to content

BAC-WT - Bank of America Warrants


ValueBuff

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 7.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

From the slide deck of Q2 earnings presentation:

 

 

Under the fully phased-in Advanced approaches 5, the estimated CET1 ratio increased to 10.4% from 10.1% in 1Q15, due to higher CET1 capital as well as lower RWA

– As previously disclosed, U.S. banking regulators have requested modifications to certain wholesale (e.g., commercial) and other credit models to exit parallel run, which is estimated to negatively impact the CET1 ratio; if these modifications were included, the estimated CET1 ratio would be approximately 9.3% at 2Q15

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From the slide deck of Q2 earnings presentation:

 

 

Under the fully phased-in Advanced approaches 5, the estimated CET1 ratio increased to 10.4% from 10.1% in 1Q15, due to higher CET1 capital as well as lower RWA

– As previously disclosed, U.S. banking regulators have requested modifications to certain wholesale (e.g., commercial) and other credit models to exit parallel run, which is estimated to negatively impact the CET1 ratio; if these modifications were included, the estimated CET1 ratio would be approximately 9.3% at 2Q15

 

Are they going to need more capital? Is that the point? They are building capital w/ each quarter right so this 9.3% would increase above 9.5%, which is Fed target for BofA I think in a couple of quarters... It could have an impact on potential capital returns for 2016 though...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

178B to 188B in terms of market cap. if +10B is turning the corner, i can't wait to see what's ahead.

 

Few years ago it was $50 billion...

 

Those $30 strike warrants still got a chance! If they can just reduce shares outstanding 10% and add another $100 billion in market cap :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

178B to 188B in terms of market cap. if +10B is turning the corner, i can't wait to see what's ahead.

 

Few years ago it was $50 billion...

 

Those $30 strike warrants still got a chance! If they can just reduce shares outstanding 10% and add another $100 billion in market cap :D

 

Google added $65B MCap in one day so why not BAC adds $100B in 3 years :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice, Nate!

 

But why the day trader type talk?!

 

"He noted that the stock has seen a pattern of selling heading into earnings that cause "dramatic drops" in price - as though investors are scared. Then, when earnings beat expectations, the price "shoots right back up again." "

 

"Tobik said that Bank of America could provide a good opportunity for traders in the wake of earnings."

 

"Tobik argued that JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE: JPM) was a "decent stock to hold on to for a while," as the price continues to push above previous resistance points. "

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Glad you found and posted this, I would have missed it otherwise, a really cool mention.  I didn't know this stuff appeared on Yahoo.  Here is the full interview:

 

As to FITB (the question I flubbed), revenue flat like the other regionals.

 

If I had to build out a trade for banks it might look like this:

Mega banks: Buy and hold, still attractive, will earn inflation + GDP growth and maybe a percentage on top of that going forward.

Regionals: I think the ultimate winners in the US, might take 5-10 years to fully develop

Community Banks: Eventually a dead, or mostly dead sector, but where the action is now.  These guys will eventually merge their way into the regional category.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Glad you found and posted this, I would have missed it otherwise, a really cool mention.  I didn't know this stuff appeared on Yahoo.  Here is the full interview:

 

As to FITB (the question I flubbed), revenue flat like the other regionals.

 

If I had to build out a trade for banks it might look like this:

Mega banks: Buy and hold, still attractive, will earn inflation + GDP growth and maybe a percentage on top of that going forward.

Regionals: I think the ultimate winners in the US, might take 5-10 years to fully develop

Community Banks: Eventually a dead, or mostly dead sector, but where the action is now.  These guys will eventually merge their way into the regional category.

 

BAC just hit 3% YTD barely passing S&P for the first(?) time this year. Why would you buy and hold a mega bank with serious qualitative issues when options are available for trading it? BAC is the gift that keeps on giving to the small investor.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Glad you found and posted this, I would have missed it otherwise, a really cool mention.  I didn't know this stuff appeared on Yahoo.  Here is the full interview:

 

As to FITB (the question I flubbed), revenue flat like the other regionals.

 

If I had to build out a trade for banks it might look like this:

Mega banks: Buy and hold, still attractive, will earn inflation + GDP growth and maybe a percentage on top of that going forward.

Regionals: I think the ultimate winners in the US, might take 5-10 years to fully develop

Community Banks: Eventually a dead, or mostly dead sector, but where the action is now.  These guys will eventually merge their way into the regional category.

 

BAC just hit 3% YTD barely passing S&P for the first(?) time this year. Why would you buy and hold a mega bank with serious qualitative issues when options are available for trading it? BAC is the gift that keeps on giving to the small investor.

 

I agree with you on BAC, read what I said in the interview.  It appears to be the ultimate trading stock selling off before earnings then rebounding.  I don't trade and I don't know how to read charts, but the pattern is clear.  If you know options or whatever else then that's probably an even better way to play it.

 

My point is that large banks are becoming more utility-like.  This is clearly how the government sees them, and I think investors should have a similar view.  Their scale is incredible, they throw off too much cash to reinvest.  They'll pay significant dividends or buyback a lot of shares going forward.  Similar to a utility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Glad you found and posted this, I would have missed it otherwise, a really cool mention.  I didn't know this stuff appeared on Yahoo.  Here is the full interview:

 

As to FITB (the question I flubbed), revenue flat like the other regionals.

 

If I had to build out a trade for banks it might look like this:

Mega banks: Buy and hold, still attractive, will earn inflation + GDP growth and maybe a percentage on top of that going forward.

Regionals: I think the ultimate winners in the US, might take 5-10 years to fully develop

Community Banks: Eventually a dead, or mostly dead sector, but where the action is now.  These guys will eventually merge their way into the regional category.

 

BAC just hit 3% YTD barely passing S&P for the first(?) time this year. Why would you buy and hold a mega bank with serious qualitative issues when options are available for trading it? BAC is the gift that keeps on giving to the small investor.

 

I agree with you on BAC, read what I said in the interview.  It appears to be the ultimate trading stock selling off before earnings then rebounding.  I don't trade and I don't know how to read charts, but the pattern is clear.  If you know options or whatever else then that's probably an even better way to play it.

 

My point is that large banks are becoming more utility-like.  This is clearly how the government sees them, and I think investors should have a similar view.  Their scale is incredible, they throw off too much cash to reinvest.  They'll pay significant dividends or buyback a lot of shares going forward.  Similar to a utility.

 

I don't think it's necessary to be able to read charts or know patterns (I haven't the clue how to do that) to see how to trade BAC.  It is fundamentally undervalued under a certain range + volatile stock = money.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Glad you found and posted this, I would have missed it otherwise, a really cool mention.  I didn't know this stuff appeared on Yahoo.  Here is the full interview:

 

As to FITB (the question I flubbed), revenue flat like the other regionals.

 

If I had to build out a trade for banks it might look like this:

Mega banks: Buy and hold, still attractive, will earn inflation + GDP growth and maybe a percentage on top of that going forward.

Regionals: I think the ultimate winners in the US, might take 5-10 years to fully develop

Community Banks: Eventually a dead, or mostly dead sector, but where the action is now.  These guys will eventually merge their way into the regional category.

 

BAC just hit 3% YTD barely passing S&P for the first(?) time this year. Why would you buy and hold a mega bank with serious qualitative issues when options are available for trading it? BAC is the gift that keeps on giving to the small investor.

 

I agree with you on BAC, read what I said in the interview.  It appears to be the ultimate trading stock selling off before earnings then rebounding.  I don't trade and I don't know how to read charts, but the pattern is clear.  If you know options or whatever else then that's probably an even better way to play it.

 

My point is that large banks are becoming more utility-like.  This is clearly how the government sees them, and I think investors should have a similar view.  Their scale is incredible, they throw off too much cash to reinvest.  They'll pay significant dividends or buyback a lot of shares going forward.  Similar to a utility.

 

I don't think it's necessary to be able to read charts or know patterns (I haven't the clue how to do that) to see how to trade BAC.  It is fundamentally undervalued under a certain range + volatile stock = money.

 

 

I loaded up when it was below 17 during the Greece/China thingy.  Have sold most off into this rally.  Will load up again during the next 'crisis' and sell again when all looks rosy again.  It is the perfect trading stock with liquid Options, and slightly undervalued so it you get stuck awhile you dont feel too bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"The departing C.F.O., Mr. Thompson, 50, was widely seen as the person in line to fill Mr. Moynihan’s shoes, but his star dimmed, people briefed on the matter said, after the bank miscalculated its capital levels by $4 billion last year.

 

Mr. Moynihan was angry at Mr. Thompson and his team for the mistake, people briefed on the matter said. He appointed a trusted former FleetBoston colleague to take over the bank’s preparation for its stress test submissions, a job that had been done by the C.F.O." - NYT

 

"Star dimmed" is that NYT speak for "went supernova and exploded into flames"?  I'm not Moynihan fanboy, but it seems like there had to be some accountability for some pretty glaring failures.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"The departing C.F.O., Mr. Thompson, 50, was widely seen as the person in line to fill Mr. Moynihan’s shoes, but his star dimmed, people briefed on the matter said, after the bank miscalculated its capital levels by $4 billion last year.

 

Mr. Moynihan was angry at Mr. Thompson and his team for the mistake, people briefed on the matter said. He appointed a trusted former FleetBoston colleague to take over the bank’s preparation for its stress test submissions, a job that had been done by the C.F.O." - NYT

 

"Star dimmed" is that NYT speak for "went supernova and exploded into flames"?  I'm not Moynihan fanboy, but it seems like there had to be some accountability for some pretty glaring failures.

 

Thompson wanted another job that he can manage some business; that's why he is no longer the CFO. If he didn't have other aspirations he would have been still the CFO I think. There is a lot of filling the dots coming from the journalists as usual. They need some sensational news so they can cover their pages and sell some newspapers...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah i read that account as well.  To me, it seems less likely he left to go run another bank, but he just doesnt quite know which one yet.  Especially, given the impressive performance of his units in the stress tests.  But maybe he will be announced ceo in waiting of jpm in a week or two and it will support that story. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...