fareastwarriors Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 http://www.cnbc.com/id/100669188 What Chesapeake's Tax Bill Tells Us About Its Profits Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nkp007 Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 http://www.cnbc.com/id/100669188 What Chesapeake's Tax Bill Tells Us About Its Profits Chesapeake is spending a very elevated amount on capex as it transitions to more liquids production. As a result, the accelerated deductions it takes due to increased capex makes sense. Hopefully in 2014 and 2015, they reduce the capex as they become satisfied by both 1) better natural gas prices and 2) their liquids production. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fareastwarriors Posted May 1, 2013 Share Posted May 1, 2013 Chesapeake Earnings: Driller Boosts Output Targets . http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323628004578456754091183418.html?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTWhatsNewsCollection Revenue rose 42% to $3.42 billion. Analysts polled by Thomson Reuters expected a profit of 25 cents on revenue of $2.85 billion. Total production increased 9% from the year earlier, to 4.0 billion cubic feet per day. Separately Wednesday, Semgroup Corp. SEMG +3.16%said it has agreed to buy Mid-America Midstream Gas Services LLC—the owner of gas-gathering and gas-processing assets in the Mississippi Lime formation—from Chesapeake for $300 million in cash. The deal is expected to close in the third quarter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muscleman Posted May 1, 2013 Share Posted May 1, 2013 Chesapeake Earnings: Driller Boosts Output Targets . http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323628004578456754091183418.html?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTWhatsNewsCollection Revenue rose 42% to $3.42 billion. Analysts polled by Thomson Reuters expected a profit of 25 cents on revenue of $2.85 billion. Total production increased 9% from the year earlier, to 4.0 billion cubic feet per day. Separately Wednesday, Semgroup Corp. SEMG +3.16%said it has agreed to buy Mid-America Midstream Gas Services LLC—the owner of gas-gathering and gas-processing assets in the Mississippi Lime formation—from Chesapeake for $300 million in cash. The deal is expected to close in the third quarter. Nice! The media kept talking about CHK's liquidity short fall, but when I look at CHK's long term bonds, they are trading at a yield of 2-4%. That clearly says that CHK's liquidity position is solid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plato1976 Posted May 1, 2013 Share Posted May 1, 2013 don't think chk has a short term liquidity issue but what really worries me is their asset sale plan Seems they can only sell assets at fire sale price now - this will dramatically reduce IV Every single buyer on this earth knows CHK needs money, and even SINOPEC got a pretty sweet deal - historically Chinese corps usually overpaid for oversea assets due to various reasons Chesapeake Earnings: Driller Boosts Output Targets . http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323628004578456754091183418.html?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTWhatsNewsCollection Revenue rose 42% to $3.42 billion. Analysts polled by Thomson Reuters expected a profit of 25 cents on revenue of $2.85 billion. Total production increased 9% from the year earlier, to 4.0 billion cubic feet per day. Separately Wednesday, Semgroup Corp. SEMG +3.16%said it has agreed to buy Mid-America Midstream Gas Services LLC—the owner of gas-gathering and gas-processing assets in the Mississippi Lime formation—from Chesapeake for $300 million in cash. The deal is expected to close in the third quarter. Nice! The media kept talking about CHK's liquidity short fall, but when I look at CHK's long term bonds, they are trading at a yield of 2-4%. That clearly says that CHK's liquidity position is solid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muscleman Posted May 1, 2013 Share Posted May 1, 2013 don't think chk has a short term liquidity issue but what really worries me is their asset sale plan Seems they can only sell assets at fire sale price now - this will dramatically reduce IV Every single buyer on this earth knows CHK needs money, and even SINOPEC got a pretty sweet deal - historically Chinese corps usually overpaid for oversea assets due to various reasons Chesapeake Earnings: Driller Boosts Output Targets . http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323628004578456754091183418.html?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTWhatsNewsCollection Revenue rose 42% to $3.42 billion. Analysts polled by Thomson Reuters expected a profit of 25 cents on revenue of $2.85 billion. Total production increased 9% from the year earlier, to 4.0 billion cubic feet per day. Separately Wednesday, Semgroup Corp. SEMG +3.16%said it has agreed to buy Mid-America Midstream Gas Services LLC—the owner of gas-gathering and gas-processing assets in the Mississippi Lime formation—from Chesapeake for $300 million in cash. The deal is expected to close in the third quarter. Nice! The media kept talking about CHK's liquidity short fall, but when I look at CHK's long term bonds, they are trading at a yield of 2-4%. That clearly says that CHK's liquidity position is solid. This is why we need margin of safety before investing in stocks. CHK's NAV according to some chatters in a LongLeaf Partners' presentation, is $51 assuming $75 oil and $4.5 gas. That is about $33 Bn. Even if in the worst case scenario, CHK has to erode $10 Bn in value to achieve these sale targets, we are still buying at 60% of NAV. The current situation looks to me that they would erode at most $3-5 bn of value, so we should be in good shape. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
compoundinglife Posted May 6, 2013 Share Posted May 6, 2013 Hmm, Lou resigned from the board. I really liked having him there. Will be interesting to see if keeps his shares. http://www.ogfj.com/articles/2013/05/simpson-to-resign-as-chesapeake-energy-director-.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fareastwarriors Posted May 13, 2013 Share Posted May 13, 2013 http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-05-13/chesapeake-ruling-shocks-with-117-million-loss-credit-markets.html Chesapeake Ruling Shocks With $117 Million Loss Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nkp007 Posted May 13, 2013 Share Posted May 13, 2013 Hmm, Lou resigned from the board. I really liked having him there. Will be interesting to see if keeps his shares. http://www.ogfj.com/articles/2013/05/simpson-to-resign-as-chesapeake-energy-director-.html Any ideas why he left? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LC Posted May 13, 2013 Share Posted May 13, 2013 Hmm, Lou resigned from the board. I really liked having him there. Will be interesting to see if keeps his shares. http://www.ogfj.com/articles/2013/05/simpson-to-resign-as-chesapeake-energy-director-.html Any ideas why he left? Not sure...do you know if he sat on any committees? I know when auditors resign it's a bad sign, not sure what it says when a board member resigns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muscleman Posted May 13, 2013 Share Posted May 13, 2013 http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-05-13/chesapeake-ruling-shocks-with-117-million-loss-credit-markets.html Chesapeake Ruling Shocks With $117 Million Loss Cool. Looks like CHK just picked up a little bit more money. I am surprised that no one posted the ruling updates on May 8th. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nkp007 Posted May 15, 2013 Share Posted May 15, 2013 http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1056831/000105683113000002/submission051513.txt berkowitz picks up some $chk - hopefully it doesn't drop by 50% like $bac did after he picked it up. anyways, this doesn't make our facts any more or less right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muscleman Posted May 15, 2013 Share Posted May 15, 2013 http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1056831/000105683113000002/submission051513.txt berkowitz picks up some $chk - hopefully it doesn't drop by 50% like $bac did after he picked it up. anyways, this doesn't make our facts any more or less right. This is weird..... Is he good at energy companies? I thought he only sticks to Insurance, REIT and Financials. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PlanMaestro Posted May 15, 2013 Share Posted May 15, 2013 this doesn't make our facts any more or less right. Specially when we already have T-bone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
compoundinglife Posted May 15, 2013 Share Posted May 15, 2013 http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1056831/000105683113000002/submission051513.txt berkowitz picks up some $chk - hopefully it doesn't drop by 50% like $bac did after he picked it up. anyways, this doesn't make our facts any more or less right. This is weird..... Is he good at energy companies? I thought he only sticks to Insurance, REIT and Financials. http://www.dataroma.com/m/hist/p_hist.php?f=fairx I think he sticks to whatever he feels his cheap. Has some history in the energy/utility space. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nkp007 Posted May 15, 2013 Share Posted May 15, 2013 http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1056831/000105683113000002/submission051513.txt berkowitz picks up some $chk - hopefully it doesn't drop by 50% like $bac did after he picked it up. anyways, this doesn't make our facts any more or less right. This is weird..... Is he good at energy companies? I thought he only sticks to Insurance, REIT and Financials. http://www.dataroma.com/m/hist/p_hist.php?f=fairx I think he sticks to whatever he feels his cheap. Has some history in the energy/utility space. $CHK is cheap with limited downside in 2013 and into 2014 due to hedges but... the crux of this investment is a bet on oil prices. If oil stays above $80, $CHK wins. Meanwhile, everyone else thinks $CHK is a natural gas company that is almost bankrupt due to debt issues. Check out the maturity schedule in the presentation for reality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShahKhezri Posted May 15, 2013 Share Posted May 15, 2013 BB was pretty early on CNQ. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plato1976 Posted May 15, 2013 Share Posted May 15, 2013 what if oil falls below 80 but NG rises above $6 ? http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1056831/000105683113000002/submission051513.txt berkowitz picks up some $chk - hopefully it doesn't drop by 50% like $bac did after he picked it up. anyways, this doesn't make our facts any more or less right. This is weird..... Is he good at energy companies? I thought he only sticks to Insurance, REIT and Financials. http://www.dataroma.com/m/hist/p_hist.php?f=fairx I think he sticks to whatever he feels his cheap. Has some history in the energy/utility space. $CHK is cheap with limited downside in 2013 and into 2014 due to hedges but... the crux of this investment is a bet on oil prices. If oil stays above $80, $CHK wins. Meanwhile, everyone else thinks $CHK is a natural gas company that is almost bankrupt due to debt issues. Check out the maturity schedule in the presentation for reality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T-bone1 Posted May 15, 2013 Share Posted May 15, 2013 this doesn't make our facts any more or less right. Specially when we already have T-bone. Thanks Plan, it's nice to see both Pabrai and Berkowitz investing in the company (alongside Icahn & Southeastern) . . . of course we won't know if we are correct until Ericopoly takes a position. BTW I really enjoyed and was impressed with your tweet on "roads not taken" . . . some very good points to be made there. T-Bone1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nkp007 Posted May 22, 2013 Share Posted May 22, 2013 Looks like Chairman Archie Dunham bought a lot of shares yesterday - http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/895126/000089512613000160/xslF345X03/edgardoc.xml 450,000 @ $20.89 ($9.4 million) His total stake is now 799,138 shares or approximately $16.7 million as of today's close. Impressive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plato1976 Posted May 27, 2013 Share Posted May 27, 2013 Pretty intensive insider buy recently. I suppose these money is from their own pockets... May 20, 2013 RYAN THOMAS L Director 2,000 Direct Purchase at $20.95 per share. 41,900 May 20, 2013 RASPINO LOUIS Director 15,000 Direct Purchase at $21.12 per share. 316,800 May 19, 2013 RASPINO LOUIS Director 10,000 Direct Purchase at $20.86 per share. 208,600 May 19, 2013 DUNHAM ARCHIE W Director 450,000 Direct Purchase at $20.89 per share. 9,400,500 Looks like Chairman Archie Dunham bought a lot of shares yesterday - http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/895126/000089512613000160/xslF345X03/edgardoc.xml 450,000 @ $20.89 ($9.4 million) His total stake is now 799,138 shares or approximately $16.7 million as of today's close. Impressive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fareastwarriors Posted July 3, 2013 Share Posted July 3, 2013 http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/07/03/chesapeake-discovers-the-price-of-a-costly-quest-for-oil/ Chesapeake Discovers the Price of a Costly Quest for Oil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plato1976 Posted July 6, 2013 Share Posted July 6, 2013 Quite a mystery to me that the share price keeps depressed although they are deleveraging their balance sheet gradually http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/07/03/chesapeake-discovers-the-price-of-a-costly-quest-for-oil/ Chesapeake Discovers the Price of a Costly Quest for Oil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nkp007 Posted July 7, 2013 Share Posted July 7, 2013 Quite a mystery to me that the share price keeps depressed although they are deleveraging their balance sheet gradually http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/07/03/chesapeake-discovers-the-price-of-a-costly-quest-for-oil/ Chesapeake Discovers the Price of a Costly Quest for Oil Lot of the articles that have come out recently definitely paint the company in a desperate light because of the cheap sale price of their closed sales. However, 1) The consensus is ignoring the immense cash flow that the company generates and that only 36% of revenues come from natural gas (and I'm sure a lot of this production is incidental to oil and NGL). It's amazing to me that even Chesapeake touts the "we are the natural gas champion" story. People will eventually be very surprised. 2) The consensus is ignoring that if these are the properties that Chesapeake is selling, imagine the value of what they are keeping. This investment for me has hinged on whether oil will stay above $80 in the long-term. Given that the marginal cost of production of a barrel in the U.S. is apparently closer to $90, I feel it's a decent bet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plato1976 Posted July 7, 2013 Share Posted July 7, 2013 May I know where did you get the $90 marginal cost data ? looks like CHK and SD have a much lower cost profile for oil , and I used to think they are the "marginal" suppliers, esp. CHK Quite a mystery to me that the share price keeps depressed although they are deleveraging their balance sheet gradually http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/07/03/chesapeake-discovers-the-price-of-a-costly-quest-for-oil/ Chesapeake Discovers the Price of a Costly Quest for Oil Lot of the articles that have come out recently definitely paint the company in a desperate light because of the cheap sale price of their closed sales. However, 1) The consensus is ignoring the immense cash flow that the company generates and that only 36% of revenues come from natural gas (and I'm sure a lot of this production is incidental to oil and NGL). It's amazing to me that even Chesapeake touts the "we are the natural gas champion" story. People will eventually be very surprised. 2) The consensus is ignoring that if these are the properties that Chesapeake is selling, imagine the value of what they are keeping. This investment for me has hinged on whether oil will stay above $80 in the long-term. Given that the marginal cost of production of a barrel in the U.S. is apparently closer to $90, I feel it's a decent bet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now