Jump to content

SD - SandRidge Energy


SmallCap

Recommended Posts

Myth, I agree that Ward is a great investor with SD corp. assets.  I asked the question because you made the comment within the paragraph that related to his personal hedge fund so I thought you were referring to his pesonal investment performance. 

 

Personally, I wish he stayed in Oklahoma to run SD.  His promotional gigs obviously aren't successfully spreading the word, same goes for Chad at FTP.  My suggestion... Go sit at your desk and create real value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I have mixed feelings. The promos have really helped me understand the story, but you are right the market isnt responding. SD just needs to sell 400,000 acres for 1.8 billion cash and carry. The stock price would respond if that happened. Not hard when you have 200k in extra that showed up cheaply. Until then we are a slave to WTI. Selling 200k to 400k along with another billion dollar Miss trust, and 500 million permian trust would be nice though. A few small bolt ons in the Gulf at 2x cash flow wouldnt be bad either...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mr. market currently has no love to commodities stocks.  It's his job to promote the company either way.

 

No it's not. It's his job to run and grow the company, and to not care about short-term movements of the stock.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mr. market currently has no love to commodities stocks.  It's his job to promote the company either way.

 

No it's not. It's his job to run and grow the company, and to not care about short-term movements of the stock.

 

I don't think its either or. He can run and grow the company as well as promoting it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mr. market currently has no love to commodities stocks.  It's his job to promote the company either way.

 

No it's not. It's his job to run and grow the company, and to not care about short-term movements of the stock.

 

I don't think its either or. He can run and grow the company as well as promoting it.

 

Right, but my point is promoting the company and promoting the stock are two different things. He's nowhere near as bad as Mclendon though.. Who does the rounds of talk shows saying CHK stock should double.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have mixed feelings. The promos have really helped me understand the story, but you are right the market isnt responding. SD just needs to sell 400,000 acres for 1.8 billion cash and carry. The stock price would respond if that happened. Not hard when you have 200k in extra that showed up cheaply. Until then we are a slave to WTI. Selling 200k to 400k along with another billion dollar Miss trust, and 500 million permian trust would be nice though. A few small bolt ons in the Gulf at 2x cash flow wouldnt be bad either...

 

I don't know Myth.

I agree to a certain extent with you about asset sales and Ward has said that a net sale of about 250K acres could be in the works, but if you think about it, doing all that selling you describe would get the stock moving but is it in the best interest in the long run?

 

It sure looks great to sell assets for $4,600/acre that he bought for $215/acre, but hanging on to those assets and exploiting them rather than monetizing them would give SD a value of $14,000/acre. To me this has always been a story about having the foresight to acquire great assets at really dirt cheap prices and then having to get creative in finding the cash to exploit them.

If you think about it, even the Dynamic acquisition was done to get their hands on immediate cash flows on the cheap which means that much less assets they have to sell in their main plays on the continent.

 

I think we sometimes are our own biggest enemy as we tend to play in the options world and the problem with options every now and then something happens like a scandal about the CEO or something and someone calls time on us before our game is over.

But I do think SD's story is developing as expected and it will continue to do so.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have till 2014 on the bulk of my options. I havent done a calculation, but I remember on a call a few quarters ago a discussion between Ward and an analyst. The PV really drops off after 10 years or so. Ward wants less then 10 years of inventory, and probably has closer to 15 right now. You want to pull that forward to avoid having most of it discounted away.

 

The only way to do that is to sell some of it. He doesnt want to sell the Permian which makes sense.  Its like a factory, and no one will drill it better than them. You run the 10 rigs or so there for the next 10 years, and get 80% IRRs. You can do a few trusts along the way and that area of the company is basically self funding.

 

In this Miss we just so happened to pick up an extra 200k for maybe $400 an acre. He could today sell that for $4k to $6k, generating a 10k return in a matter of months. He could probably sell acreage in the old Miss for more due to  it being proved out. Instead of getting a 10x return and basically eliminating the funding gap till 2014, you want him to hobble along for another few years dependant on the markets. You also risk a take under because the shares wont rise without the gap being closed, and with that crippled balance sheet.

 

Sometimes you got to give a little to get alot. I would prefer no funding gap, and a large JV partner for another 200k-400k (we would still have 800k - 1 million to ourselves, we got 200k just out of the blue). Then finally a billion dollar trust in the Permian and Miss each year (selling 50% of each would net SD $1 billion in cash, $1 billion in shares). This cash should be used to reduce debt, and acquire offshore assets.

 

Who losses here? We lose out on some of the NAV from $4k / $6k to $14k on those acres, but after you discount that 10 - 15 years do we really loss? NAV per acre is probably closer to $20k after taking into account oil price risings and 4 acre spacing, but still its being discounted over 15 years because these would be the last wells drilled.

 

Those are my thoughts, let me know what you think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have just finished reading 34 pages on this thread. It's clear that why SD is one of favorite stock in the board.

I have some questions that I still do not understand because I am very new to O&G industry.

 

How many of production out of SD has been hedged ? I read in the investor presentation. SD has 80% of Oil production hedged in 2012 but only 13% of NG is hedged (swap&collar) in 2012 . Is this correct ?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't put my finger on the exact number but I believe that SD isn't planning on selling much NG into the markets until the prices improve, therefore, not much of a reason to hedge production (as there isn't any...or at least not very much).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a large position in this stock and thought we were through with this volatility with the positive last quarter. They are meeting all targets and wells are producing better than expected. It will take time for the drill bit to offset the debt but barring a complete collapse of oil they should do extremely well. The hedges will take them tnrough a fairly long period. I am adding as the stock drops to average down a bit even though I have enough. Been a tough couple of weeks when added to my position in MFC but will hold. Never thought stock would approach the 5's again but such is the market. Bought some may calls just before the quarter for a flip in case of positive news. Well I won,t be doing that again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: SD - SandRidge Energyk=topic=3427" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic" 76918#msg76918 data-ipsquote-timestamp=1336952268]

I have till 2014 on the bulk of my options. I havent done a calculation, but I remember on a call a few quarters ago a discussion between Ward and an analyst. The PV really drops off after 10 years or so. Ward wants less then 10 years of inventory, and probably has closer to 15 right now. You want to pull that forward to avoid having most of it discounted away.

 

The only way to do that is to sell some of it. He doesnt want to sell the Permian which makes sense.  Its like a factory, and no one will drill it better than them. You run the 10 rigs or so there for the next 10 years, and get 80% IRRs. You can do a few trusts along the way and that area of the company is basically self funding.

 

In this Miss we just so happened to pick up an extra 200k for maybe $400 an acre. He could today sell that for $4k to $6k, generating a 10k return in a matter of months. He could probably sell acreage in the old Miss for more due to  it being proved out. Instead of getting a 10x return and basically eliminating the funding gap till 2014, you want him to hobble along for another few years dependant on the markets. You also risk a take under because the shares wont rise without the gap being closed, and with that crippled balance sheet.

 

Sometimes you got to give a little to get alot. I would prefer no funding gap, and a large JV partner for another 200k-400k (we would still have 800k - 1 million to ourselves, we got 200k just out of the blue). Then finally a billion dollar trust in the Permian and Miss each year (selling 50% of each would net SD $1 billion in cash, $1 billion in shares). This cash should be used to reduce debt, and acquire offshore assets.

 

Who losses here? We lose out on some of the NAV from $4k / $6k to $14k on those acres, but after you discount that 10 - 15 years do we really loss? NAV per acre is probably closer to $20k after taking into account oil price risings and 4 acre spacing, but still its being discounted over 15 years because these would be the last wells drilled.

 

Those are my thoughts, let me know what you think.

 

I think you're right.

I almost forgot why I personally asked Ward about his answer to all his critics who say that fixing SD's balance sheet is not a priority for him. I asked him because it's priority for me  :)

I agree with you, if SD shareholders could chose, I think we would all chose to close the funding gap so that we don't take on any additional debt and then work on solidifying the balance sheet.

All in all your position makes more sense than mine I think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don,t know about the rest of you SD holders but I have to admit I am getting whiplash the way this stock goes up and down. Can only assume the big machines are playing this. Have been for the most part buy and hold but certainly could have day traded this if was so inclined. Keep drilling and bringing those wells on line and at some point you would assume value would be recognized.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don,t know about the rest of you SD holders but I have to admit I am getting whiplash the way this stock goes up and down. Can only assume the big machines are playing this. Have been for the most part buy and hold but certainly could have day traded this if was so inclined. Keep drilling and bringing those wells on line and at some point you would assume value would be recognized.

 

 

LEAPS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have falling oil prices, Europe being....europe, and Patriot coal rumours of chapter 11. This might get even cheaper.  I am waiting for FFH and Prem to start buying, for value guys they seemed to call the top on this one pretty well.

 

cheers

Zorro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...