Jump to content

Current Bullishness - What do you all think


Myth465

Recommended Posts

That's what you were saying Smazz, but there were a number of people who thought we were headed back to the lows of 2009.  Cheers!

 

I do not know about your time horizon but it really is not finished yet. The system is fully loaded with risks. Crowds' denial is not providing me with any sense of comfort.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I've noticed increased bullish behavior. Couple of my relatives have gotten back in the stock market and are boasting about how their picks are making more money.

 

Gurufocus has a neat, daily updated article on "Where Are We with Market Valuations" and it finally dipped in the modestly overvalued territory about a week ago.

 

http://www.gurufocus.com/stock-market-valuations.php

 

I mean, take it all with a grain a salt. My relatives are not indicative of the entire population and you can't base your investment philosophy off a GuruFocus article but it's all starting to smell optimistic again.

 

I also like packer's ideas - especially MGAM. They have a nice presentation on their website http://ir.multimediagames.com/events.cfm and the Baupost group http://www.dataroma.com/m/stock.php?sym=mgam is also a shareholder.  Personally don't own a position since it's recent rally has turned me off and I haven't done my required reading the co yet. But yeah, there definitely seems to be some cheap stuff still laying around.

 

Happy New Year! 新年快樂!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest broxburnboy

Looks like government debt yields have bottomed out and are beginning to rise.

Obvious consumer price inflation is about to spike upwards .. most commodities have hit all time USD highs in the last 6 months and the mother of all inflation drivers - the price of oil has broken out to the upside. Governments need more tax revenues which they will happily tack on to the pump price of gasoline.

QE2 has successfully driven the appearance of a stock market rally (not a rally in inflation adjusted terms). QE3 is needed to monetize municipal and state debt and to buy sovereign debt to "contain" rising interest rates... it is widely anticipated.

Ergo... we will have a stock market rally driven by inflation fears, another helicopter drop of freshly printed money, rising interest rates and search for real yield... that is what is intended.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think there are certainly significant risks on the horizon, but I wonder a little bit as to whether I'm fighting the last war.

 

For instance, I hear a lot of people saying that they're not finding as much value as they'd like to in the markets, but the question is whether they're subconsciously comparing the current market to the 2009 lows.  In other words, if they're finding companies that are potentially selling at a 50% discount, do they automatically think, "well, that's great, but it's not selling at a 75% discount like in 2009."

 

Feet to the fire, I'd obviously err on the side of caution, but I do wonder whether the recency of the last crash is causing some bias.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think there are certainly significant risks on the horizon, but I wonder a little bit as to whether I'm fighting the last war.

 

I am not sure the war is over yet. It may have only started and more battles are to follow. I find it absolutely weird that so many are already partying when there is so much debt in both public and private sectors as compared to any rational measure of solvency in most advanced countries and when the most important emerging nations seem to be catching our diseases pretty quickly. There are not that many historical periods like that. Moreover we may be in the process of discovering that our assets may not be sufficient to cover that debt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you got a quick glimpse of the current bullishness today from comparing the a priori NFP numbers with the eventual NFP number.  People were thinking 140K-160K with possible upside, and we got 100K.  (Putting aside the fact that even 140K would really only cover new entrants and makes no progress towards plugging the old hole.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Moreover we may be in the process of discovering that our assets may not be sufficient to cover that debt."

 

I find this claim very hard to believe.

US total net worth as of Q3 2010 is about $55 trillion.

US total debt is just shy of $14 trillion.

 

Some have argued about social security and medicare costs, but you have to remember these are future promises that may or may not end up in their current form, nor is the net worth figure static, it is growing. In all, I don't see how the massive wealth of the US is even close to our total debts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest broxburnboy

"Moreover we may be in the process of discovering that our assets may not be sufficient to cover that debt."

 

I find this claim very hard to believe.

US total net worth as of Q3 2010 is about $55 trillion.

US total debt is just shy of $14 trillion.

 

Some have argued about social security and medicare costs, but you have to remember these are future promises that may or may not end up in their current form, nor is the net worth figure static, it is growing. In all, I don't see how the massive wealth of the US is even close to our total debts.

 

Whatever you feel the total wealth of the US is composed off... one thing is undisputable... income from it is declining.... and present and future liabilites attached to it are increasing... capital  is being sold off through a permanent trade imbalance and monetary dillution to close the gap. Risk of default is increasing as the enterprise moves private losses onto public balance sheets. The massive wealth is decreasing.. and there is no end in sight.

The reported net worth is "growing" by using unsound accounting practices like carrying the accumulated cost of the wealth destroying wars as an off balance sheet asset at cost, when in fact it is ongoing self stoking liability, ditto most of the "pork-barrel" spending.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Moreover we may be in the process of discovering that our assets may not be sufficient to cover that debt."

 

I find this claim very hard to believe.

US total net worth as of Q3 2010 is about $55 trillion.

US total debt is just shy of $14 trillion.

 

Some have argued about social security and medicare costs, but you have to remember these are future promises that may or may not end up in their current form, nor is the net worth figure static, it is growing. In all, I don't see how the massive wealth of the US is even close to our total debts.

 

Is the $55t net worth that of the entire nation - public and private? If so, shouldn't that be compared with total debt held by both the pubic and private sector. Your $14t figure appears to be that of the Federal govt only.

 

On the other hand, it is not clear to me whether we should just look at debt held by foreigners only since debt held by domestic investors would simply offset a large chunk of the debt.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...