FrankArabia Posted November 27, 2012 Share Posted November 27, 2012 Palantir, you will do no such thing...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest rimm_never_sleeps Posted November 27, 2012 Share Posted November 27, 2012 Per FierceWireless, a new report from IDC Research shows that enterprises will buy more iPhones than BlackBerry devices for the first time ever in 2012. According to IDC, Apple (AAPL) will ship 31.1 million iPhones directly to companies this year, far outpacing the number of BlackBerry phones RIM will ship to companies. The issue for RIM, says IDC, is that even though RIM offers the best security for corporate IT departments, most enterprise users don’t need top-notch security and can get by with either an iPhone or an Android phone. IDC also says that RIM’s recent woes have reduced app developer interest in the platform, a major problem that “hinders its viability going forward.” http://bgr.com/2012/11/27/iphone-blackberry-android-enterprise-market/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Myth465 Posted November 27, 2012 Share Posted November 27, 2012 Rimm needs new Management and to be sold. There is a ton of new tech coming out, what makes them think they can spend 2 years developing a phone which will be outdated 6 months after its released. How is share though only 1.6%, suits still pretty much have to use blackberries at most places. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rmitz Posted November 28, 2012 Share Posted November 28, 2012 Rimm needs new Management and to be sold. There is a ton of new tech coming out, what makes them think they can spend 2 years developing a phone which will be outdated 6 months after its released. How is share though only 1.6%, suits still pretty much have to use blackberries at most places. 1) My personal experience doesn't seem to indicate that executives "have to" use blackberries at most places. 2) Even if they did, there aren't *that* many executives vs the entire smartphone market... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LowIQinvestor Posted November 28, 2012 Share Posted November 28, 2012 "Yacktman Asset Management doubled its stake in Research In Motion (RIMM) last quarter by purchasing an additional 12.2 million shares in the company. Despite a falling market share, Yactman, like a few others, is confident in the 80 million worldwide BlackBerry users and the upcoming BlackBerry 10 operating system. " “People do like to use the keyboard, and there is a big embedded base,” Yacktman said in an interview with Bloomberg. “This company could be worth a lot more.” http://bgr.com/2012/11/28/rim-stock-blackberry-10-recover/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheBoyGeniusReport+%28BGR+%7C+Boy+Genius+Report%29 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Palantir Posted November 28, 2012 Share Posted November 28, 2012 ^Value investors lining up to jump into a black hole. #Contrarians Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrankArabia Posted November 28, 2012 Share Posted November 28, 2012 i hate using Rim keyboard....it takes me sometimes 5-6 tries to pin in my password cause the letter blocks are so fricken small.... every time i want to buy RIM i say, "just use the product" immediately i i change my mind.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest rimm_never_sleeps Posted November 28, 2012 Share Posted November 28, 2012 (This story has been posted on The Wall Street Journal Digital Network's AllThingsD site at http://allthingsd.com.) By John Paczkowski Research In Motion's contract dispute with Nokia has gone south, and in the worst way possible. A Swedish arbitrator overseeing the pair's spat over a license for Nokia's standard-essential patents has ruled that RIM is not entitled to sell device's using the Finnish company's Wifi technologies until it pays royalties on them. The spat between the two companies involves a 2003 licensing agreement that allowed RIM to use some of Nokia's standard-essential patents. The BlackBerry maker assumed that Nokia's WiFi patents were included in that deal, reasoning that they should be part of any agreement related to standard-essential patents. But in Nokia's mind, they were not and the two companies soon began sparring over the issue. Last year they went into arbitration. And now the tribunal that heard their arguments has determined that Nokia's WiFi patents were not covered by that 2003 agreement. This is a huge problem because RIM is already selling a bunch of hardware that uses them and has been for years. And now Nokia has filed cases in the United States , Britain and Canada to enforce the arbitrator's ruling. An unfortunate turn of events for RIM, and one that couldn't come at a worse time. The company is scrambling to launch a new platform and portfolio of handsets that it hopes will help it regain traction in the market it helped pioneer. To have those devices -- and its current ones, as well -- suddenly pulled from major markets would be a crippling blow. Which is not to say RIM is without options here. It could attempt some sort of workaround. It could fight things out in court. Or it could simply roll over and pay the licensing fee Nokia is asking. Of the three, the latter seems the most likely option given the circumstances. As Jefferies analyst Peter Misek told AllThingsD, "We think RIM has to settle, likely a royalty rate of $2 to $5 per handsets..." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stahleyp Posted November 28, 2012 Share Posted November 28, 2012 ^Value investors lining up to jump into a black hole. #Contrarians While, time will tell if this is a good investment, do you honestly, really think you've done as much research as Yacktman or Watsa (who sits on the board)? :o Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest valueInv Posted November 28, 2012 Share Posted November 28, 2012 ^Value investors lining up to jump into a black hole. #Contrarians While, time will tell if this is a good investment, do you honestly, really think you've done as much research as Yacktman or Watsa (who sits on the board)? :o What research did Yacktman do to figure out people want keyboards on their phones? Looking at the buying patterns of smartphones in the last 5 years? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stahleyp Posted November 28, 2012 Share Posted November 28, 2012 ^Value investors lining up to jump into a black hole. #Contrarians While, time will tell if this is a good investment, do you honestly, really think you've done as much research as Yacktman or Watsa (who sits on the board)? :o What research did Yacktman do to figure out people want keyboards on their phones? Looking at the buying patterns of smartphones in the last 5 years? We don't hang out so I can't answer that! ;) But, if you're really interested, here ya go. http://www.yacktman.com/contact_us.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parsad Posted November 28, 2012 Share Posted November 28, 2012 ^Value investors lining up to jump into a black hole. #Contrarians While, time will tell if this is a good investment, do you honestly, really think you've done as much research as Yacktman or Watsa (who sits on the board)? :o What research did Yacktman do to figure out people want keyboards on their phones? Looking at the buying patterns of smartphones in the last 5 years? I think investors have to differentiate between a growing dominant brand that is fairly valued, and a stagnant (even dying brand) but trading at less than liquidation value of assets. Yacktman isn't betting that RIM is going to displace the iPhone. He's just betting there is enough life left in the product and brand, where the valuation justifies the possible risk/reward. Cheers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alertmeipp Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 ^Value investors lining up to jump into a black hole. #Contrarians While, time will tell if this is a good investment, do you honestly, really think you've done as much research as Yacktman or Watsa (who sits on the board)? :o What research did Yacktman do to figure out people want keyboards on their phones? Looking at the buying patterns of smartphones in the last 5 years? I think investors have to differentiate between a growing dominant brand that is fairly valued, and a stagnant (even dying brand) but trading at less than liquidation value of assets. Yacktman isn't betting that RIM is going to displace the iPhone. He's just betting there is enough life left in the product and brand, where the valuation justifies the possible risk/reward. Cheers! I hope BB10 will work out, their phone is clearing inferior now and when volume drop, production cost per unit goes up and this will kill the company quick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Palantir Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 ^Value investors lining up to jump into a black hole. #Contrarians While, time will tell if this is a good investment, do you honestly, really think you've done as much research as Yacktman or Watsa (who sits on the board)? :o I don't think Mr Watsa or Mr Y doing research has an effect on BB's future market share...I realize that's not what you meant, and Parsad has a point in that they may be looking at it merely as a collection of assets, but I'm skeptical of this approach as a consistently viable investment strategy. Incidentally, people had a chance to buy Apple in the late 90s purely on an asset basis the same way as RIMM... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LowIQinvestor Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 Goldman Sachs boosts rating on RIM, shares surge http://finance.yahoo.com/news/goldman-sachs-boosts-rating-rim-134153852.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrankArabia Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 i'm surprised again and again by how much weight some useless opinion from some sellside analyst has on a stock.....who da heck is buying this cause of a research note? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stahleyp Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 ;D ;D ;D ;D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
txlaw Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 Two M2M- and Internet of Things-related articles in the WSJ today. One on heart care devices that send data across the web. One on GE's big push for the Internet of Things and M2M and a new report they just released. See GE report at http://files.gereports.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/ge-industrial-internet-vision-paper.pdf And Information Week on GE's report: http://www.informationweek.com/global-cio/interviews/what-ges-15-trillion-industrial-internet/240142639 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
portfolio14 Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 Two M2M- and Internet of Things-related articles in the WSJ today. One on heart care devices that send data across the web. One on GE's big push for the Internet of Things and M2M and a new report they just released. See GE report at http://files.gereports.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/ge-industrial-internet-vision-paper.pdf And Information Week on GE's report: http://www.informationweek.com/global-cio/interviews/what-ges-15-trillion-industrial-internet/240142639 Yeah, read a similar article on NYT a couple of days ago. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/24/technology/internet/ge-looks-to-industry-for-the-next-digital-disruption.html?pagewanted=1&_r=0&smid=tw-share&pagewanted=all Translate that to impacts on RIMM, it means the upside has more ways to play out and the downside has slightly better protection (because it gives more reasons why someone like IBM will be interested to buy part of it). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
portfolio14 Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 While, time will tell if this is a good investment It's not that simple. Single outcome doesn't necessarily imply it's skills, not luck. p.s. I'm long RIMM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
portfolio14 Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 international markets following N/A markets lower. rimm USA share at 1.6%. http://bgr.com/2012/11/27/blackberry-market-share-2012-analysis/ "The Kantar autumn numbers in these markets are brutal. BlackBerry’s share tanked from 24% to 3% in Spain in just one year. RIM’s share is also down from 9% to 3% in Brazil and down from 16% to 7% in France." How do we reconcile these data with the slowly growing 80m user-base reported in RIMM's filings? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
portfolio14 Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 I think investors have to differentiate between a growing dominant brand that is fairly valued, and a stagnant (even dying brand) but trading at less than liquidation value of assets. Yacktman isn't betting that RIM is going to displace the iPhone. He's just betting there is enough life left in the product and brand, where the valuation justifies the possible risk/reward. Cheers! +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest rimm_never_sleeps Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 international markets following N/A markets lower. rimm USA share at 1.6%. http://bgr.com/2012/11/27/blackberry-market-share-2012-analysis/ "The Kantar autumn numbers in these markets are brutal. BlackBerry’s share tanked from 24% to 3% in Spain in just one year. RIM’s share is also down from 9% to 3% in Brazil and down from 16% to 7% in France." How do we reconcile these data with the slowly growing 80m user-base reported in RIMM's filings? the user base is growing with low ARPU plans in places like indonesia, south africa and middle east. Subscribers are down and ARPU is down in the USA. "The growth in international markets was offset by continued weak results in the second quarter of fiscal 2013 in the United States where a 12% decline in the subscriber base has caused service revenue to decline by 12%. " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest rimm_never_sleeps Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 Two M2M- and Internet of Things-related articles in the WSJ today. One on heart care devices that send data across the web. One on GE's big push for the Internet of Things and M2M and a new report they just released. See GE report at http://files.gereports.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/ge-industrial-internet-vision-paper.pdf And Information Week on GE's report: http://www.informationweek.com/global-cio/interviews/what-ges-15-trillion-industrial-internet/240142639 rimm management has not mentioned one word about this new business in the last 2 conference calls. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest rimm_never_sleeps Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 I don't think Mr Watsa or Mr Y doing research has an effect on BB's future market share...I realize that's not what you meant, and Parsad has a point in that they may be looking at it merely as a collection of assets, but I'm skeptical of this approach as a consistently viable investment strategy. Incidentally, people had a chance to buy Apple in the late 90s purely on an asset basis the same way as RIMM... not to mention that PW initial thesis was an earnings based one and not "sum of the parts". cheers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now