Packer16 Posted September 18, 2011 Share Posted September 18, 2011 If the markets are going to have limited growth for awhile, one way managers can add value is to repurchase stock (if it is under IV). From my observation, this is good in theory but many times in practice managment's overpay for shares when the stock is high and when the stock price declines they do not re-purchase. A few that I have seen that perform smart re-purchase are AM, JRN and WPO. Do you know of any others? TIA. Packer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
augustabound Posted September 18, 2011 Share Posted September 18, 2011 In googling Singleton I found this article that names Loews as the smartest buyers from the '70 through '08ish. http://www.bitsofnews.com/content/view/6823/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liberty Posted September 18, 2011 Share Posted September 18, 2011 In googling Singleton I found this article that names Loews as the smartest buyers from the '70 through '08ish. http://www.bitsofnews.com/content/view/6823/ I wonder if it's because they are perennially selling for much lower than book... That would help with timing for sure :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcowelby Posted September 18, 2011 Share Posted September 18, 2011 In Canada: OCX Significant decrease in the number of shares for the past 10 years Year shares (Millions) 2000: 164 2001: 162.5 2002: 161.1 2003: 153.7 2004: 140 2005: 138.8 2006: 133 2007: 125 2008: 122.5 2009 120.3 2010 118 GBT.B This company have been highly profitable for those who never sold their shares for the past 10 to 15 years It is hard to compares the numbers of shares from one year to another because they keep buying back their shares and then splitting the remainder every few years! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NormR Posted September 18, 2011 Share Posted September 18, 2011 If the markets are going to have limited growth for awhile, one way managers can add value is to repurchase stock (if it is under IV). From my observation, this is good in theory but many times in practice managment's overpay for shares when the stock is high and when the stock price declines they do not re-purchase. A few that I have seen that perform smart re-purchase are AM, JRN and WPO. Do you know of any others? TIA. You're going to have to define smart/IV to get good responses. It seems to me that some of the private equity guys have been smart in taking whole firms private, levering them up to get back their investment, and then selling back into the market. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beerbaron Posted September 18, 2011 Share Posted September 18, 2011 Methanex has returned lots of money in buybacks. Pre-Paid Legal Services did an incredible job at buybacks before they were taken private. BeerBaron Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alwaysinvert Posted September 18, 2011 Share Posted September 18, 2011 Swedish Match: http://www.swedishmatch.com/en/Investors/The-share/Repurchases/ Sold the stock two months ago, though. Valuation is not great, but the business sure is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packer16 Posted September 18, 2011 Author Share Posted September 18, 2011 By smart repurchase I mean increasing IV per share. For example, JRN has had 5% declines in FCF per year and reduced them to less than 1% per year and with their stock so cheap they can keep on doing this. If you buy overvalued stock, then you dilute FCF/share. I guess the key metric has the repurchases helped or hurt FCF/share. Packer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ERICOPOLY Posted September 18, 2011 Share Posted September 18, 2011 (Unless you guys are planning to continue to hold the shares after they become overvalued) why do you care if the manager is overpaying for the shares you are selling back to him? They seem to be working in the best interests of value oriented shareholders who buy cheap and sell dear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packer16 Posted September 18, 2011 Author Share Posted September 18, 2011 Buying overpriced shares does not indicate very good capital allocation skills. The intent is to use share repurchased as an indicator of good capital allocation skills. Packer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ERICOPOLY Posted September 18, 2011 Share Posted September 18, 2011 Buying overpriced shares does not indicate very good capital allocation skills. The intent is to use share repurchased as an indicator of good capital allocation skills. Packer Depends. They might just be laundering the dividend as a capital gain for tax reasons. In which case, it actually is value enhancing on an after-tax basis. Buffett wouldn't agree though, as Berkshire pays 5% dividend tax on many of it's holdings vs 35% capital gains tax. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ourkid8 Posted September 18, 2011 Share Posted September 18, 2011 I would like to add Philip Morris International (PM) as very shareholder friendly in returning cash in the form of a large dividend and a very large share repurchase program. Since the March 08' spin-off from Altria until the end of June 11' Philip Morris International spent $18.9B to purchase 378.4 million shares, representing 17.9% of the shares outstanding at that time. The average price of the stock repurchased was $50/share and at current price of $69.08 represents a 38% RoR on their investment. PM also pays a very generous dividend of $3.08/share and since retiring 378.4 million shares since the spin-off saves annually $1.1B in dividend payments! This is my largest portfolio holding and I plan to hold this investment for life! :) Thanks, S Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alwaysinvert Posted September 19, 2011 Share Posted September 19, 2011 Buying overpriced shares does not indicate very good capital allocation skills. The intent is to use share repurchased as an indicator of good capital allocation skills. Packer Shareholders by holding shares implicitly state that the shares are not overpriced. Just because management makes continous repurchases instead of highly opportunistic ones doesn't make it bad capital allocation. For shareholders it's still better than taxable dividends. I'm quite skeptic on repurchases overall, but if companies do them I rather see them do it as an alternative to dividends rather than speculations that the stock is too low. Irregular repurchasing programmes are more often badly timed then well timed, and trying to work out afterwards if they were based on good analysis is subject to considerable hindsight bias. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now