Jump to content

WFC - Wells Fargo


Viking

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yield curve is no longer flat or inverted.

Companies drawing their credit lines.

All these should be good for the bank.

Don’t understand why banks sold off so much.

Investing in WFC implies much more than the shape of the yield curve but, based on this criteria alone, when an inverted curve reverses historically has acted (correlation) as a leading indicator of future opportunities to buy bank stocks.

From the horse's mouth, March 2019

https://www08.wellsfargomedia.com/assets/pdf/personal/investing/investment-institute/COTW_04032019_FINAL_ADA.pdf

from the Fed March 2020, click max

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/T10Y2Y

 

An obvious counter-argument is that (since the virus effect is so obvious) the oncoming economic difficulties are priced in. I may be wrong but I've decided to wait because I feel that the underlying economy was showing significant signs of weakness much before the virus. One has to wonder if consequences of a slowdown in a levered environment may not be underestimated. Maybe the Fed can pull it off again but the hole is getting deeper?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wells has asked to remove asset cap so that it can support its customers per the FT.  Charlie Scharf bought ~$5MM in stock.  Let's go.

 

It’s a great opportunity to redeem me themselves. I think the Fed will grant this request.

 

Given their recent absence of a spine I fail to see why not  ;D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wells has asked to remove asset cap so that it can support its customers per the FT.  Charlie Scharf bought ~$5MM in stock.  Let's go.

 

It’s a great opportunity to redeem me themselves. I think the Fed will grant this request.

 

Given their recent absence of a spine I fail to see why not  ;D

 

Everyone else is getting let off early:

 

there have been calls to release prisoners in order to mitigate the crisis

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/03/coronavirus-prison-cases-raise-alarms-calls-inmate-release-200319152245414.html

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am comparing WFC with PNC and USB

The later two have slightly lower divided yield, but seems higher quality and less reputation damage?

 

Wells has asked to remove asset cap so that it can support its customers per the FT.  Charlie Scharf bought ~$5MM in stock.  Let's go.

 

It’s a great opportunity to redeem me themselves. I think the Fed will grant this request.

 

Given their recent absence of a spine I fail to see why not  ;D

 

Everyone else is getting let off early:

 

there have been calls to release prisoners in order to mitigate the crisis

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/03/coronavirus-prison-cases-raise-alarms-calls-inmate-release-200319152245414.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So many (nearly all? all?) of the big banks are committing to not laying anyone off at the same time non performing loans are probably skyrocketing.

 

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-morgan-stanley/two-us-banks-halt-layoffs-amid-coronavirus-uncertainty-idUSKBN21D2QD

 

Wells has also initiated at least two different bonus programs

 

https://www.bizjournals.com/charlotte/news/2020/03/24/wells-fargo-to-temporarily-shutter-local-branches.html

 

The WFC story was largely a cost cutting story, right? But in the short term costs are going to be higher, interest rates lower, and I lack the mental capacity to even conceptualize of what non performing loans are going to look like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

A few sectors were hit badly during this crisis and some may be permanently impaired

one is oil&gas but we learned wfc has limited exposure to this sector;

the other is commercial real estate (esp. malls) and most old retailers;

I think the damage to these two sectors may be long lasting, we don't know wfc's exposure to retailers/malls

 

hotels and travel related sectors were also hit badly, could be just one time hit, but still poses risk to wfc's loan if exposed

 

The WFC story was largely a cost cutting story, right?

 

The story is an extra $1 of sustainable earnings from cost cutting is $15 a share at 15x earnings.  These extraordinary pay increases over the next 5 months don't noticeably erode that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

A few sectors were hit badly during this crisis and some may be permanently impaired

one is oil&gas but we learned wfc has limited exposure to this sector;

the other is commercial real estate (esp. malls) and most old retailers;

I think the damage to these two sectors may be long lasting, we don't know wfc's exposure to retailers/malls

 

hotels and travel related sectors were also hit badly, could be just one time hit, but still poses risk to wfc's loan if exposed

 

The WFC story was largely a cost cutting story, right?

 

The story is an extra $1 of sustainable earnings from cost cutting is $15 a share at 15x earnings.  These extraordinary pay increases over the next 5 months don't noticeably erode that.

 

Real estate exposure is way more of a concern than energy, which is pretty limited. If real estate gets impaired broadly  then a lot of dominos will tumble. In the end, banks are just levered bets on the economy.

 

Lower NIMs and much higher loan losses are not a great combination.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Schwab711

Anyone know why WFC down a lot more than peers today?

I can’t find any relevant news.

 

I believe it's due to growing concerns around MBS and profitability of mortgage underwriting going forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

but why today?

is there any especially bad news related to real estate/mortgage coming out today?

 

Anyone know why WFC down a lot more than peers today?

I can’t find any relevant news.

 

I believe it's due to growing concerns around MBS and profitability of mortgage underwriting going forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

UK banks suspended dividends -  may be US banks are next

 

unlikely at this point but it is definitely going to be a stressful time the next couple of months.  Q1 shouldn't demonstrate much impact yet...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

"With unemployment expected to remain high, after forbearance ends, servicing costs could impact 2020 earnings by 0.1% to 0.8%."   

 

"The same expectations could hit earnings to competitor shadow bank mortgage originators and servicers by 1000%.  They are already screaming for mercy because they are blowing up.  Now, get the fk out of my office."  - Me.  Just now.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can anyone speak to the risk (if any) banks are taking in with this influx of small business loans? BofA had 10k applications in the first hour.

 

 

They won't have any risk but they will earn a fee for processing / administering these programs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Banks stand to make billions from US small business rescue

 

https://www.ft.com/content/c584885c-6d64-4531-99e6-334c6ec0c57c

 

Banks will receive processing fees, paid by the federal government, for making the loans. The fees will vary with loan size: 5 per cent for loans under $350,000, 3 per cent for loans under $2m, and 1 per cent for loans greater than $2m. The loans will not incur a capital charge.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...