Cardboard Posted May 5, 2012 Share Posted May 5, 2012 http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-05-05/buffett-shuns-22-billion-deal-to-protect-stock-holdings.html The company has $34 billion in cash and $31 billion in fixed income securities. Both must be earnings fairly unattractive yields or I would assume a much lower rate than the considered acquisition. You also have the possibility of borrowing some funds for the acquisition at ultra low rates. While I understand his concept of a fortress balance sheet, I don't think that making this deal would have jeopardized at all his stated mantra of: "Our cheques will clear". Cardboard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twacowfca Posted May 5, 2012 Share Posted May 5, 2012 http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-05-05/buffett-shuns-22-billion-deal-to-protect-stock-holdings.html The company has $34 billion in cash and $31 billion in fixed income securities. Both must be earnings fairly unattractive yields or I would assume a much lower rate than the considered acquisition. You also have the possibility of borrowing some funds for the acquisition at ultra low rates. While I understand his concept of a fortress balance sheet, I don't think that making this deal would have jeopardized at all his stated mantra of: "Our cheques will clear". Cardboard That's not exactly what I understood. I think what he was trying to convey is that the deal wasn't so great that it was worthwhile to sell some of his stockholdings to pay for it, although it would have been a better use of capital in this low interest rate period if they had had enough cash available to close it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shane Posted May 5, 2012 Share Posted May 5, 2012 How feasible would it be for Buffett to take a major company in the U.S. from public to private? For instance ADM is roughly $22 Bln and he has mentioned them as attractive before. However, that would require board approval... correct? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
onyx1 Posted May 6, 2012 Share Posted May 6, 2012 Here is a list of publicly traded US/Canadian companies with MV between $18bln and $22bln (sorry for the weird formatting): El Paso Corp. (NYSE:EP) 22,919 Manulife Financial Corporation (TSX:MFC) 22,907 Newmont Mining Corp. (NYSE:NEM) 22,874 State Street Corporation (NYSE:STT) 22,773 Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (NasdaqGS:ISRG) 22,438 BB&T Corporation (NYSE:BBT) 22,056 WellPoint Inc. (NYSE:WLP) 21,921 The Mosaic Company (NYSE:MOS) 21,677 CBS Corporation (NYSE:CBS) 21,564 Johnson Controls Inc. (NYSE:JCI) 21,501 Archer Daniels Midland Company (NYSE:ADM) 21,338 Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation (NasdaqGS:CTSH) 21,206 McKesson Corporation (NYSE:MCK) 21,087 salesforce.com, inc (NYSE:CRM) 20,905 Coach, Inc. (NYSE:COH) 20,872 Corning Inc. (NYSE:GLW) 20,746 Cummins Inc. (NYSE:CMI) 20,585 Stryker Corp. (NYSE:SYK) 20,521 Teck Resources Limited (TSX:TCK.B) 20,519 Williams Companies, Inc. (NYSE:WMB) 20,459 AFLAC Inc. (NYSE:AFL) 20,325 Discovery Communications, Inc. (NasdaqGS:DISC.A) 20,200 The Chubb Corporation (NYSE:CB) 19,846 Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. (NYSE:TMO) 19,845 Spectra Energy Corp. (NYSE:SE) 19,779 FirstEnergy Corp. (NYSE:FE) 19,644 Phillips 66 (NYSE:PSX) 19,199 Rogers Communications Inc. (TSX:RCI.B) 19,161 Broadcom Corp. (NasdaqGS:BRCM) 19,081 Marathon Oil Corporation (NYSE:MRO) 18,874 American Electric Power Co., Inc. (NYSE:AEP) 18,685 Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (NYSE:MMC) 18,613 Ecolab Inc. (NYSE:ECL) 18,557 PG&E Corp. (NYSE:PCG) 18,394 Yahoo! Inc. (NasdaqGS:YHOO) 18,388 Air Products & Chemicals Inc. (NYSE:APD) 18,082 Baker Hughes Incorporated (NYSE:BHI) 18,057 Kellogg Company (NYSE:K) 18,013 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shane Posted May 6, 2012 Share Posted May 6, 2012 Thanks for the list, not very long! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcollon Posted May 6, 2012 Share Posted May 6, 2012 I was at the meeting and don't think the Bloomberg story depicts exactly what was said. I'm when someone produces their transcript, it will come out in a more understandable way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dual_bid Posted May 6, 2012 Share Posted May 6, 2012 Ecolab, a truely entrenched enterprise, is on Gates/Larson's portfolio, to which he added lately. Nalco, a recent merger transaction for Ecolab (http://investor.ecolab.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=592813), was on Berkshire's list. Larson, early on (circa 04-05), also originated the trains' idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woltac Posted May 6, 2012 Share Posted May 6, 2012 I agree with dcollon. Although the quotes in the article sound accurate, the discussion was much longer than the three quotes cited would lead one to believe. I got the impression that the purchase did not work out for other reasons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CONeal Posted May 19, 2012 Share Posted May 19, 2012 It really doesn't amount to anything but I wouldn't be surprised if it was Hershey or Mars. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
philassor Posted May 19, 2012 Share Posted May 19, 2012 http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-05-05/buffett-shuns-22-billion-deal-to-protect-stock-holdings.html The company has $34 billion in cash and $31 billion in fixed income securities. Both must be earnings fairly unattractive yields or I would assume a much lower rate than the considered acquisition. You also have the possibility of borrowing some funds for the acquisition at ultra low rates. While I understand his concept of a fortress balance sheet, I don't think that making this deal would have jeopardized at all his stated mantra of: "Our cheques will clear". Cardboard That's not exactly what I understood. I think what he was trying to convey is that the deal wasn't so great that it was worthwhile to sell some of his stockholdings to pay for it, although it would have been a better use of capital in this low interest rate period if they had had enough cash available to close it. My recollection is that they could no agree on the terms. (maybe they wanted brk stock or too much money?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now