Guest swf83 Posted May 21, 2012 Share Posted May 21, 2012 I am 29 years old, two children, and have a very stable executive position with a great company. I have a Whole Life Policy that my dad bought for me when I was little. Current death benefit is $215,000, current cash value is $35k I actively contribute to my 401k at about 9% of my annual salary. My thoughts are to surrender the whole life policy, which earns about 4% internal rate of return annually, and up my 401k contributions to the max. This would provide me with a nice cash cushion that would Let me sleep better at night. Of course the Whole Life policy isn't subject to market fluctuations , but I feel like I can do better by cashing out an putting that cash towards upping my 401k contributions. Thoughts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CONeal Posted May 21, 2012 Share Posted May 21, 2012 What if you died in 3 years? Would your kids be fine and able to have their needs supported as they grow up? Making sure you kids are provided for if you don't make it to work in the morning, is the reason for insurance in the first place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim Eriksen Posted May 21, 2012 Share Posted May 21, 2012 I agree. Take the 35k, max your 401k. I would also get a $500,000 to $1 million term policy. The term life insurance would probably cost under $300 for the 500k policy and ~$450 for the million, per year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parsad Posted May 21, 2012 Share Posted May 21, 2012 ...Of course the Whole Life policy isn't subject to market fluctuations , but I feel like I can do better by cashing out an putting that cash towards upping my 401k contributions. Thoughts? I would rethink that statement...not only based on your policy. How exactly will insurers achieve the 4% return on guaranteed whole life policies? Alot of Japanese insurers went bankrupt back in the 90's and early millenium after rates hit historic lows, because they could not cover their insurance liabilities. Why will we not see the same thing with insurers in the United States or Europe? Your insurance policy may only be as good as your insurer, and no different than any other financial institution when they cannot match assets and liabilities. Cheers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest swf83 Posted May 21, 2012 Share Posted May 21, 2012 Thanks for the thoughts. To further clarify, I do have a 30 year term policy in place. Also, the policy is with Mass Mutual, so the risk of bankruptcy is rather minute. Any further comments would be welcomed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now