Jump to content

RNK - Rainmaker Entertainment


Packer16

Recommended Posts

this is definitely a situation that most investors will run away from......

 

will there be any operational activity left at rnk after the asset sale, i.e. will it be an empty shell or will there be operating expenses and potentially cash burn that could eat into the mos?

 

regards

rijk

 

Ask yourselves, the remaining assets in the company...be it cash, the note, tax losses, tax credits or potential back-end revenue from "Escape From Planet Earth".  Would they generate more shareholder value by being sold off, or in the hands of productive value managers.  You guys have heard of Leucadia National, correct?  Cheers!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 120
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

the potential upside is clear and looks attractive,... i'm just worried about the downside, there is only a few million nav if the back end revenue deal doesn't work for some reason, which could easily evaporate in case there is a few million opex remaining in rnk after the asset sale, for example, what happens with the salary of the new cfo?

 

regards

rijk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the potential upside is clear and looks attractive,... i'm just worried about the downside, there is only a few million nav if the back end revenue deal doesn't work for some reason, which could easily evaporate in case there is a few million opex remaining in rnk after the asset sale, for example, what happens with the salary of the new cfo?

 

regards

rijk

 

Please explain in more detail ? How much do you expect it being and based on what?

TIA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In terms of recovering what they could and could recover in the future, they have stopped the bleeding by selling the studio and retaining the revenue share upside whatever that turns out to be.  Without Tim and Francis involved, I would not have touched this with a 10 ft pole.

 

Packer

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the potential upside is clear and looks attractive,... i'm just worried about the downside, there is only a few million nav if the back end revenue deal doesn't work for some reason, which could easily evaporate in case there is a few million opex remaining in rnk after the asset sale, for example, what happens with the salary of the new cfo?

 

regards

rijk

 

The back-end revenue is just a kicker.  The value of the company is in the cash, note, tax credits and tax losses. 

 

In terms of recovering what they could and could recover in the future, they have stopped the bleeding by selling the studio and retaining the revenue share upside whatever that turns out to be.  Without Tim and Francis involved, I would not have touched this with a 10 ft pole.

 

Packer

 

Jeff Stacey owns about 9%.  We own about 7%.  That's over 60% in the hands of four very similar value managers.  Name another company like that in Canada...in the U.S.?  Four managers who would always put shareholders first.  Cheers!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the potential upside is clear and looks attractive,... i'm just worried about the downside, there is only a few million nav if the back end revenue deal doesn't work for some reason, which could easily evaporate in case there is a few million opex remaining in rnk after the asset sale, for example, what happens with the salary of the new cfo?

 

regards

rijk

 

The back-end revenue is just a kicker.  The value of the company is in the cash, note, tax credits and tax losses. 

 

In terms of recovering what they could and could recover in the future, they have stopped the bleeding by selling the studio and retaining the revenue share upside whatever that turns out to be.  Without Tim and Francis involved, I would not have touched this with a 10 ft pole.

 

Packer

 

Jeff Stacey owns about 9%.  We own about 7%.  That's over 60% in the hands of four very similar value managers.  Name another company like that in Canada...in the U.S.?  Four managers who would always put shareholders first.  Cheers!

 

Thanks I thought i missed something

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a very interesting idea - thanks for bringing it up.  Been going through the filings and had a couple of questions:

 

1) the $5mm loan is a 2nd lien loan - any color on how much is ahead of it?  I think I saw a $2mm number in the APA but not sure if that's just the minimum needed.

2) In the Q2 MD&A, I see that that the co forecasts $5.7mm in production credits post transaction.  Is this the same as tax credits A/R?  Or am I confusing myself here?  If it is one and the same, why did it decline so much from $12.7mm ($13.7mm total A/R) from 6/30?  Did they travel with the sale?

 

Thanks.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wasn't able to find anything on the 1st lien holders but this entity will be receving 60% of the back-end revenues form Escape from Planet Earth.  The post production credits are credits for post production services (different than tax credits).  I believe these are the net credits after the post produiction of Escape from Planet Earth.

 

 

Packer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Rainmaker ends deal to sell animation studio

 

 

2012-09-17 08:38 ET - News Release

 

 

Mr. Darren Battersby reports

 

RAINMAKER ENTERTAINMENT ANNOUNCES TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT PROPOSING TO SELL ANIMATION STUDIO

 

Rainmaker Entertainment Inc. has terminated the asset purchase agreement dated June 27, 2012, pursuant to which Rainmaker Studios Inc. (RSI), a wholly owned subsidiary of Xing Xing Digital Corporation, had proposed to acquire certain assets consisting of substantially all of Rainmaker's animation studio assets.

 

Rainmaker delivered its notice of termination because the parties were unable to close the transaction on or prior to Sept. 14, 2012, as had been agreed. The board of directors of Rainmaker felt that due to the delay in closing the transaction, it was in the best interests of Rainmaker and its shareholders that the company focus on its existing business operations and on exploring alternative transactions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rainmaker ends deal to sell animation studio

 

 

2012-09-17 08:38 ET - News Release

 

 

Mr. Darren Battersby reports

 

RAINMAKER ENTERTAINMENT ANNOUNCES TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT PROPOSING TO SELL ANIMATION STUDIO

 

Rainmaker Entertainment Inc. has terminated the asset purchase agreement dated June 27, 2012, pursuant to which Rainmaker Studios Inc. (RSI), a wholly owned subsidiary of Xing Xing Digital Corporation, had proposed to acquire certain assets consisting of substantially all of Rainmaker's animation studio assets.

 

Rainmaker delivered its notice of termination because the parties were unable to close the transaction on or prior to Sept. 14, 2012, as had been agreed. The board of directors of Rainmaker felt that due to the delay in closing the transaction, it was in the best interests of Rainmaker and its shareholders that the company focus on its existing business operations and on exploring alternative transactions.

 

When one door closes...another will always open.  Cheers!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rainmaker ends deal to sell animation studio

 

 

2012-09-17 08:38 ET - News Release

 

 

Mr. Darren Battersby reports

 

RAINMAKER ENTERTAINMENT ANNOUNCES TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT PROPOSING TO SELL ANIMATION STUDIO

 

Rainmaker Entertainment Inc. has terminated the asset purchase agreement dated June 27, 2012, pursuant to which Rainmaker Studios Inc. (RSI), a wholly owned subsidiary of Xing Xing Digital Corporation, had proposed to acquire certain assets consisting of substantially all of Rainmaker's animation studio assets.

 

Rainmaker delivered its notice of termination because the parties were unable to close the transaction on or prior to Sept. 14, 2012, as had been agreed. The board of directors of Rainmaker felt that due to the delay in closing the transaction, it was in the best interests of Rainmaker and its shareholders that the company focus on its existing business operations and on exploring alternative transactions.

 

When one door closes...another will always open.  Cheers!

 

do you know something we don't or do you trust the management or know management better than we do ? If so please share your insights ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rainmaker ends deal to sell animation studio

 

 

2012-09-17 08:38 ET - News Release

 

 

Mr. Darren Battersby reports

 

RAINMAKER ENTERTAINMENT ANNOUNCES TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT PROPOSING TO SELL ANIMATION STUDIO

 

Rainmaker Entertainment Inc. has terminated the asset purchase agreement dated June 27, 2012, pursuant to which Rainmaker Studios Inc. (RSI), a wholly owned subsidiary of Xing Xing Digital Corporation, had proposed to acquire certain assets consisting of substantially all of Rainmaker's animation studio assets.

 

Rainmaker delivered its notice of termination because the parties were unable to close the transaction on or prior to Sept. 14, 2012, as had been agreed. The board of directors of Rainmaker felt that due to the delay in closing the transaction, it was in the best interests of Rainmaker and its shareholders that the company focus on its existing business operations and on exploring alternative transactions.

 

When one door closes...another will always open.  Cheers!

 

do you know something we don't or do you trust the management or know management better than we do ? If so please share your insights ?

 

I trust management to do the right thing and maximize shareholder value.  I know Tim very well, and I've met Craig Graham and am very impressed with him as well.  They will do the best they can.  Cheers!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rainmaker ends deal to sell animation studio

 

 

2012-09-17 08:38 ET - News Release

 

 

Mr. Darren Battersby reports

 

RAINMAKER ENTERTAINMENT ANNOUNCES TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT PROPOSING TO SELL ANIMATION STUDIO

 

Rainmaker Entertainment Inc. has terminated the asset purchase agreement dated June 27, 2012, pursuant to which Rainmaker Studios Inc. (RSI), a wholly owned subsidiary of Xing Xing Digital Corporation, had proposed to acquire certain assets consisting of substantially all of Rainmaker's animation studio assets.

 

Rainmaker delivered its notice of termination because the parties were unable to close the transaction on or prior to Sept. 14, 2012, as had been agreed. The board of directors of Rainmaker felt that due to the delay in closing the transaction, it was in the best interests of Rainmaker and its shareholders that the company focus on its existing business operations and on exploring alternative transactions.

 

When one door closes...another will always open.  Cheers!

 

do you know something we don't or do you trust the management or know management better than we do ? If so please share your insights ?

 

I trust management to do the right thing and maximize shareholder value.  I know Tim very well, and I've met Craig Graham and am very impressed with him as well.  They will do the best they can.  Cheers!

 

I know that all and well one of the main reason that made me pull the trigger. Can you add some context ? what dose that look like ? what characteristics shows that other than knowing the guy ? can u show it to me without meeting him is what ti am trying to say. 

(technical question)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

This definitely looks like a cigar butt to me.

 

Post production can sometimes be a nasty, nasty industry.  Here are some post production companies that have gone bankrupt in the past several years:

Digital Domain (DDMGQ) - did amazing VFX work for blockbuster movies like Transformers.  Did the Tupac hologram for Coachella.

Meteor Studios (owned by DISCA) - VFX work for Hollywood movies

The Orphanage - VFX for movies... e.g. Matrix

Core Digital - VFX, animation

 

There are certain areas of post production which are like airlines (or maybe worse).  Some areas of post production such as doing work for TV commercials can be profitable, but that field is dominated by small boutique shops and none of them are listed (nor would it make sense for them to be public).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

This is not a post production company it sold its post production arm to another group about a year ago.  Rainmaker is an animator with alot of NOLs (tax credits), some cash and revenue share from Return to Planet Earth.  The production business is a tough business depedent upon personal contacts of the principals.  Most of the value is in the post-production credits, tax credits and the residual.  If the movie is sucessful this could be a multi-bagger.  If not it has some assets that could be acquired by someone else in excess of its current price.  The key to this investment is capital allocation skills of the majority owners Tim McElvaine and Francis Chou.    Another note I asked my kids about the trailer and they though it was like Planet 41.  Don't know if that is good or bad.

 

Packer 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...