Jump to content

FCAU - Fiat Chrysler Automobiles


LC

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

http://www.twst.com/update/37743-fiat-spa-reorganizes-after-completion-of-the-purchase-of-chrysler-group-llc

 

"In order to foster the development and continued involvement of a core base of long- term shareholders, FCA will adopt a loyalty voting structure, under which Fiat shareholders who are present or represented by proxy at the Fiat shareholder meeting called to vote on the proposal and who continue to hold their shares until the closing, regardless of how they vote, are eligible to receive special voting shares equivalent in number to the newly-issued FCA common shares they receive."

 

What the fuck does this mean? I bought their shares early last year, and I bought more last December. I have never voted in the proxy. Does this mean someone else who have voted in the proxy will receive the special voting shares but I will not? Is this a form of dilution? :o

 

"After the closing, shareholders who hold their FCA common shares for at least three years would also be entitled to participate in the loyalty voting structure.

FCA shareholders will be eligible for loyalty voting until they transfer their common shares."

Does this mean if we hold our shares for 3 years, we will receive the special voting share? Does that also trade in the stock exchange and have some value to sell? ::) It sounds like if the share is sold, the special voting share will be forfeited, so probably this mean the speial voting share will not trade in the NYSE and will not have value?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

What the fuck does this mean? I bought their shares early last year, and I bought more last December. I have never voted in the proxy. Does this mean someone else who have voted in the proxy will receive the special voting shares but I will not? Is this a form of dilution? :o

 

 

I don't think the issuance of the special voting shares will be dilutive. Fiat Industrial did something similar: see http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1024519/000119312513283773/d564825d425.htm. In Fiat Industrial's case, the special voting shares had "only minimal economic entitlements" that Fiat Industrial said were "immaterial for investors."

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

Fiat / Chrysler: ease off brakes slowly

 

Globalisation is very convenient. Fiat, now outright owner of US-based automaker Chrysler, is taking full advantage as it restructures the merged group. The tax residence shifts to the UK; nation of incorporation, to the Netherlands; the main share listing, to New York. For all the pledges about local jobs, it is tough luck, Turin.

 

 

Investors, like management, should be satisfied, but not overly excited. Wednesday’s earnings were a sharp reminder that securing the buyout of the Chrysler minority is just one step in tackling Fiat’s problems. The automaker’s €3.4bn trading profit in 2013 was essentially flat, year on year, at constant exchange rates – and in the last three months, disappointingly short of the market’s consensus estimates.

 

Problems, of course, are mainly on the Fiat side: without Chrysler, its 2013 net loss would have been 15 per cent higher, at more than €900m. A good part of this reflects weakness in Latin America, where group earnings before tax and interest more than halved last year. Fiat’s mass-market brands continued to suffer in Europe, too. These trends look likely to hold back the pace of recovery: Fiat is now guiding to €3.6bn-€4bn trading profit in 2014. The market had been hoping for more than €4.1bn.

 

All that said, the balance sheet could have been worse. Industrial net debt ended the year at €6.6bn and is expected to be about €10bn at end-2014 (after the Chrysler deal). That is about €1bn less than many investors feared.

 

Even so, if Latin America remains weak, demand in southern Europe stays sluggish and capital spending fairly high, the capital structure may need to be addressed. Fiat boss Sergio Marchionne denies plans for a rights issue and hints vaguely at more creative options. But until the road ahead becomes clearer on all these fronts, investors may want to release the brakes only slowly.

 

 

 

 

http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/3/8925431e-88eb-11e3-bb5f-00144feab7de.html?siteedition=intl#axzz2rWwocgZN

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I sold my shares today. Didn't like the profit guidance and the market is looking a bit sick. Needed to built up more cash incase things get cheaper.

 

With the profit hit the cash burn will be worse for Fiat. It could be they won't be cash flow positive for a few years. I'm just going to watch this one for now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From the La Stampa article as a sort of rebuttal to the WSJ piece:

 

Q: But are conceivable new business alliance to increase the volume? 

Elkann: "The volume as such are not sufficient on its own, so much so that General Motors, despite being the largest car manufacturer in the world, then went bankrupt in 2009. But it is also true that, if it is well managed, have more than one volume is a definite advantage. "

 

...he gets it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stating the obvious I know, but Marchionne is just phenomenal. I loved this quote on page 31 of the transcript:

 

I think the next step in fixing Europe is utilization of the industrial network to produce something other than mass market bound cars. We’ve been clear on this issue, we do not see a future for the continuation of this industrial framework to try and satisfy demand in a market which is over-serviced. And so we’re slowly moving our production assets towards that end. You’ve seen from the margins that we’ve been able to extract out of Maserati as to what is potentially doable if these assets are utilized for the right brand for global distribution. I think you need to give us time to continue to develop the rest of our network on that basis. I think at completion of the plan, we will be more than in positive territory. But it’s not going to come from the traditional application of the traditional brands in the European market. It just won’t happen. And I continue to be incredibly negative about the possibility of this market effectively coming back in and producing margins that allow anyone to recover the capital costs associated with the investments. So we had to get out of the sandbox. We’ve had this discussion before. And I’m as convinced now as I’ve ever been about the fact that our strategic direction is correct. But it’s not going to happen out of selling mass market cars, I can tell you, it won’t happen. There’s not enough margin left in the business to try and get that done.

 

 

Huge margin potential out of Chrysler too. 2013 MOP was 4.44% of revenue. After net interest expense of 994 and a 40% tax rate, net income is 1,223, or 1.08 per Fiat share. At 8.33X, Chrysler is worth $9 per Fiat share.

 

GM's North American goal is 10% EBIT margin....at a 7% MOP margin, Chrysler's EPS rises to 1.98, and is worth $16.53 at the same multiple, or $19.85 at 10X.

 

Sooo much potential here.

Fiat_4Q13_Transcript.pdf

Chrysler_4Q13_Presentation.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...