Jump to content

FCAU - Fiat Chrysler Automobiles


LC

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN0N720E20150416?irpc=93

 

Unfortunate to hear that the Ferrari spin might slip until 2016. Can't imagine what the hold up is...

 

Marchionne said work to spin-off and list luxury unit Ferrari was ongoing and he expected the floatation to happen this year, although he suggested the process may spill over into 2016.

 

 

maybe VW or Toyota want to buy/merge with Fiat, with Ferrari included?

Or maybe if there's a merger deal, it need to happen first, and then Ferrari spin?

:)

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN0N720E20150416?irpc=93

 

Unfortunate to hear that the Ferrari spin might slip until 2016. Can't imagine what the hold up is...

 

Marchionne said work to spin-off and list luxury unit Ferrari was ongoing and he expected the floatation to happen this year, although he suggested the process may spill over into 2016.

 

Probably Sergio wanting the street to underwrite it based on 2015 EBITDA that will include a huge margin lift from 1.08 euro and possibly a capacity increase to 7500-8000 units.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder why are the activists of GM pushing for more buybacks instead of merging with FCAU and having Sergio to be the CEO of GM? That would probably end up much better than a simple share repurchase.

 

Even though US antitrust review has become quite lenient over the past few decades, GM merging with Chrysler would probably not pass.

 

From the GM thread -- I brought this up earlier with some other folks in that I can't quite figure out what Sergio is playing at with his consolidation talk. Neither GM nor Ford seems like they're biting -- additionally, the regulatory scrutiny may not pass muster.

 

So one has to wonder -- what's his game with the consolidation talk?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder why are the activists of GM pushing for more buybacks instead of merging with FCAU and having Sergio to be the CEO of GM? That would probably end up much better than a simple share repurchase.

 

Even though US antitrust review has become quite lenient over the past few decades, GM merging with Chrysler would probably not pass.

 

From the GM thread -- I brought this up earlier with some other folks in that I can't quite figure out what Sergio is playing at with his consolidation talk. Neither GM nor Ford seems like they're biting -- additionally, the regulatory scrutiny may not pass muster.

 

So one has to wonder -- what's his game with the consolidation talk?

 

To add a little more color to my comment, I think the biggest hurdle would be pickup trucks. GM-Chrysler together make up 38% of pickup truck sales. Hard to argue that level of concentration would not be negative for consumers.

 

Also since the car industry is so iconic, there would be political pressure to block a merger both from an antitrust perspective as well as the perception of increasing, outsized foreign influence over a major American industry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hasn't Sergio worked the capital markets before - like announcing the Ferrari spin-off prior to the pricing of the convertible issuance which ended up resulting in significantly better pricing? Maybe he's looking for an acquisition or another share offering and looking to feed the animal spirits to get the price of the stock up?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This may be a wild idea: maybe Fiat merge with BYD? :)

Seems make sense to merge with a chinese auto maker. The automaker will instantly be able to sell in US market, and Fiat get lower labor costs (no unions). If they merge with BYD, they get the electric cars solutions which they currently don't have now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surprised that no one has made any comment about the earnings:

 

http://seekingalpha.com/pr/13307586-fca-closed-q1-with-net-revenues-of-26_4-billion-up-19-percent-and-adjusted-ebit-at-800-million-up-22-percent-net-industrial-debt-was-8_6-billion-up-0_9-billion-full-year-guidance-confirmed

 

Evidently, earnings were above estimates, but the narrowing margins are a disappointment for some analysts. Ferrari IPO confirmed for Q3 2015 with spin-off anticipated in Q1 2016.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if the push back in Ferrari IPO & separation are what caused today's share price.

 

I thought it was driven by the perception of his statements on consolidation as a sign of weakness.. I thought it was known that Ferrari IPO was later in the year

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe most people thought it was going to be done by mid-year, but Sergio had been sending some soft signals that there might be a delay in the timeframe.

 

My immediate thought on the Ferrari IPO & spin-off being separated by a full quarter was whether Marchionne is looking to make the stock look better as a currency for some form of acquisition. Otherwise, why not have the spin-off closer to the IPO?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe most people thought it was going to be done by mid-year, but Sergio had been sending some soft signals that there might be a delay in the timeframe.

 

My immediate thought on the Ferrari IPO & spin-off being separated by a full quarter was whether Marchionne is looking to make the stock look better as a currency for some form of acquisition. Otherwise, why not have the spin-off closer to the IPO?

 

Maybe it has something to do with the mandatory convertible? They are receiving shares from the spinoff as well, might be easier/cheaper to do it all at once?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This entire consolidation sales pitch is intriguing and I can see why the market is reacting negatively to it. I think it makes sense but the way he went about it was so unconventional that the market probably sees this as a desparate plea to bail them out. Even though, Sergio has categorically denied it, it also casts a shadow of doubt on FCA's 5 year plan to increase margins by invigorating growth of its premium line up (Maserati and Alfa). Besides, you can't help but wonder that if industry consolidation was such a no-brainer then why are none of the other players buying into it.

 

I'm just hoping that Sergio has an Ace up his sleeve that we don't know about...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Question to everyone that's been following Fiat.  If you had the three presentations that were posted yesterday (earnings, consolidation, and NAFTA margins) before the market did, would you have expected the stock to be up or down? 

 

The NAFTA margin target of 7% in Q4 and 8-9% by 2018 is a huge positive.  The five year plan only assumed 6-7% margins in NAFTA!  Yet somehow the article headlines for the day were "Marchionne panicked because sales are rising but margins are falling." 

 

And quantifying 2.5-4.5 billion euros a year to be saved from M&A is huge.  Also finding out Brazil will break-even in this kind of economic environment is very positive news.

 

My 2 cents, Sergio was trying to talk the stock price up (clearly didn't work) because the holdup to M&A is the current stock price, he doesn't want to split up a MergeCo based on todays equity value.  He specifically talked about how embarrassing the valuation is in the exchange with the analyst who asked who is this presentation addressed to and told him he had more say in this then he thinks. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...