indythinker85 Posted October 19, 2012 Share Posted October 19, 2012 http://www.valuewalk.com/2012/10/should-value-investors-change-their-style-tom-russo-vs-mohnish-pabrai/ I would add that although Pabrai had awful 08, Russo had a bad 08 as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mysticdrew Posted October 19, 2012 Share Posted October 19, 2012 http://www.valuewalk.com/2012/10/should-value-investors-change-their-style-tom-russo-vs-mohnish-pabrai/ I would add that although Pabrai had awful 08, Russo had a bad 08 as well. Something doesn't jive with me on the article... This line in particular when the author is contrasting their styles: "Diversification in the portfolio is a key to Pabrai’s strategy." If anything Pabrai has a concentrated strategy and Russo has much more diversification and holds many more positions. The author has a much different definition of diversification than I do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Palantir Posted October 19, 2012 Share Posted October 19, 2012 http://www.valuewalk.com/2012/10/should-value-investors-change-their-style-tom-russo-vs-mohnish-pabrai/ I would add that although Pabrai had awful 08, Russo had a bad 08 as well. Something doesn't jive with me on the article... This line in particular when the author is contrasting their styles: "Diversification in the portfolio is a key to Pabrai’s strategy." If anything Pabrai has a concentrated strategy and Russo has much more diversification and holds many more positions. The author has a much different definition of diversification than I do. Not quite, after the 08 crisis, Pabrai publicly commented that concentrated holdings was a mistake and he'd run a diversified strategy in the future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mysticdrew Posted October 19, 2012 Share Posted October 19, 2012 http://www.valuewalk.com/2012/10/should-value-investors-change-their-style-tom-russo-vs-mohnish-pabrai/ I would add that although Pabrai had awful 08, Russo had a bad 08 as well. Something doesn't jive with me on the article... This line in particular when the author is contrasting their styles: "Diversification in the portfolio is a key to Pabrai’s strategy." If anything Pabrai has a concentrated strategy and Russo has much more diversification and holds many more positions. The author has a much different definition of diversification than I do. Not quite, after the 08 crisis, Pabrai publicly commented that concentrated holdings was a mistake and he'd run a diversified strategy in the future. Yea, but it was still more concentrated than most I believe with a 2% 5% 10% sizing which would result in less holdings than Russo imo. Also, he's since gone back to the 10x10 concentrated size. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest rimm_never_sleeps Posted October 19, 2012 Share Posted October 19, 2012 http://www.valuewalk.com/2012/10/should-value-investors-change-their-style-tom-russo-vs-mohnish-pabrai/ I would add that although Pabrai had awful 08, Russo had a bad 08 as well. Something doesn't jive with me on the article... This line in particular when the author is contrasting their styles: "Diversification in the portfolio is a key to Pabrai’s strategy." If anything Pabrai has a concentrated strategy and Russo has much more diversification and holds many more positions. The author has a much different definition of diversification than I do. Not quite, after the 08 crisis, Pabrai publicly commented that concentrated holdings was a mistake and he'd run a diversified strategy in the future. diversification for pabrai is holding 15 stocks instead of 8. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kraven Posted October 19, 2012 Share Posted October 19, 2012 God this article was awful. It had it all. No direction, incorrect facts, inconsistencies, etc. Here is a great line. "He [Pabrai] agrees with Charlie Munger that a diversified portfolio can be achieved with just four different stocks, but he thinks that is nowhere near enough." I get it. According to the author, he agrees with it even though he thinks its not even close. I always like someone who can act at the same time on both sides of an issue. Shows flexibility I guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tombgrt Posted October 19, 2012 Share Posted October 19, 2012 God this article was awful. It had it all. No direction, incorrect facts, inconsistencies, etc. Here is a great line. "He [Pabrai] agrees with Charlie Munger that a diversified portfolio can be achieved with just four different stocks, but he thinks that is nowhere near enough." I get it. According to the author, he agrees with it even though he thinks its not even close. I always like someone who can act at the same time on both sides of an issue. Shows flexibility I guess. Found that sentence hilarious as well. Almost thought it was due to my poor English skills. :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Palantir Posted October 19, 2012 Share Posted October 19, 2012 Let's be serious, this website has Alwaleed as a "guru". *rolls eyes*. Also the article is written very poorly, almost like through Google Translate or something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now