Jump to content

SHLDQ - Sears Holdings Corp


alertmeipp

Recommended Posts

 

A lot of these successful people we like to admire have severe personality flaws that show up in weird ways. 

 

 

This does not bode well for Picasso's future success as I have generally found him to be a nice and upstanding guy...no clear personality flaws that would lead to mind-blowing success.  Is my logic sound here?

 

Did you hear that Picasso? roark33 thinks you are flawless. ;D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 9.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Eddie Lampert was the "next Warren Buffett" a decade ago. Now people are having fun at him. Opinions about people are such a volatile thing...

 

I think after 10+ years of contradictory evidence it's very fair to change ones' opinion of a person's abilities. I wouldn't consider it overly volatile.

 

I mean obviously Lampert chose to wrap his entire fund and legacy into one business. It turns out he was wrong on Sears. Even the best investors are frequently wrong, the issue here is he put too many chips in one basket.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eddie Lampert was the "next Warren Buffett" a decade ago. Now people are having fun at him. Opinions about people are such a volatile thing...

 

I think after 10+ years of contradictory evidence it's very fair to change ones' opinion of a person's abilities. I wouldn't consider it overly volatile.

 

I mean obviously Lampert chose to wrap his entire fund and legacy into one business. It turns out he was wrong on Sears. Even the best investors are frequently wrong, the issue here is he put too many chips in one basket.

 

 

Exactly. It's ok to be wrong...unless you bet the farm.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The consensus MSM was wrong on Eddie ten years ago, and I suppose there's a chance the consensus MSM is wrong on him now.  He still seems confident in what they're doing today.  Time will tell what happens to shareholders and thankfully SHLD is not the only investment opportunity in the stock market

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Open question to all:

 

What would it take to get you interested in, or more interested in SHLD?

 

For me, SHLD was one of my largest positions a couple of years ago when they were consistently producing free cash flow and repurchasing shares. I viewed it not as a retailer but as a giant pile of assets being priced as if it were scrap.... and every quarter that passed, I owned more and more of it. The stores were always weak but I like Bruce Berkowitz point that SHLD has more real estate than Simon Property Group yet only has 1/10th the market value... On top of that you have greater than $50/share of net inventory. The share repurchases have stopped. The free cash flow has dried up, and today I sit and wait, not really adding but not selling either.

 

Thoughts anyone?

 

I sincerely doubt that SHLD has more real estate value embedded in it than SPG does.

In addition not sure where you get that $50 a share in inventory number?

I would suggest you might also want to take a look at the liability side of the balance sheet. I assume you noticed that SHLD currently has minus 3.8 billion in equity.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You take the minus 3.8 billion in negative equity, then you back out the intangibles and goodwill from the Q4 2016 balance sheet and then you back out the proportional value on the balance sheet of the real estate assets. (I took the net value and divided that by the gross value and that gave me 44%. I multiplied that by the value of the real estate assets.) That gives me a negative value of minus $7.252 billion. Now I add to that number $1 billion to cover the likely minimum loss for 2017. That gets me a negative value of minus $8.252 billion for the equity minus intangibles, goodwill and real estate assets. (P.S. now this number does not include the cost of closing down the business as for example closing down a store costs on average more than $1 million. P.S.S. The losses this year are likely to be much higher than $1 billion.)

So lets say Eddie decides tomorrow morning he is closing down SHLD's stores and succeeds in doing that by the end of 2017. Well do the assets then cover the minus $8.252 billion? I don't think so.

Now to be more correct, I should also include the value of the equity in this calculation. After all in order to get a return on your equity, the value of the assets need to exceed the value of the equity too, but I want to be conservative so I will not do so. But not hard for someone that add that number if needed.

Also that assumes that the inventory will be worth 100 cents on the dollar in case of a liquidation of SHLD. I would put that number likely closer to 50 cents on the dollar.

 

Anyone have any specific expectations for Q1? Given that SSS are again -10% plus I am expecting pretty horrible numbers for Q1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

OK I have been thinking about this a lot.

 

I have a 2 point plan to immediately extract value from the stock.  Maybe i can bring this plan to vote.

 

1) Immediately rebrand by changing the names to: 

Amasears

and K bart 

 

This gives both brands a fresh look and should confuse shoppers enough to gain sales momentum and stop the comp store sale declines.

 

The brands sears and k mart will never be mentioned again. They will only be referred to as "they who must not be named". 

 

2)

Put SYW up for sale on craigslist.  SYW makes $2B-4B in sales?? so at one time revenue we can post it for sale at "$3B OBO" make sure to highlight OBO.

 

If an acceptable price cannot be obtained then:

 

http://fortune.com/2017/02/17/target-stock-bomb-florida/

 

hire this man, give him a hammer (maybe bruce would join too??) and ski masks, and break into hoffman estates at 3am and smash the main motherboard CPU thingy for the SYW system.  Smash it into itty bitty pieces, without mercy.  Also the hammer used should be a craftsman hammer, and it should be bought with SYW points.....to send a message.  I would assume the stock price would jump 200% on the news.  We all know SYW is holding the real estate hostage.

 

That is all...for now

 

You are a godamned genius!

 

Heartfelt apologies 4 previous disagreement.

 

Stay thirsty my friend (everyone calm down, that's not gonna become my tagline...)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Kmart in my area is MUCH better stocked/taken care of than the one profiled in the article.  HOWEVER, even at that higher level, the store is rough around the edges.  You can tell maintenance and improvements have been put off for YEARS.  Most of the clothing is private label stuff and EXTREMELY cheap stuff.

 

In my mind, there is simply no way that SHLD is going to ever get back to profitability...they are simply trying to run out the clock as long as possible.  Wal-Mart, Meijers, and other competitors are simply going to steam roll SHLD.  The only question is how long will it take?  6 months, 12 months, 18 months? 

 

SHLD is done, put a fork in them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://blog.searsholdings.com/eddie-lampert/transformation-update/

 

As I have said before, the level of support we have from our vendors is an important factor in defining the size of our business and the number of stores we can operate responsibly going forward.  We reached the point in the past 12 months where some of our vendors have reduced their support thereby placing additional pressure on our business. Despite this challenge, we have been working and fighting hard to improve our operational performance and streamline our organization.

I see merchandise payables hit under $1b for the recent quarter. For Eddie to specifically mention this suggests to me that suppliers pulling the plug might just be the stake that will finally finish this zombie off.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SHLD selling Kenmore on Amazon… Isn’t this just giving customers one less reason to go to a Sears store?

 

Yes....

 

And one more reason to continue closing down the stores and recognize the value/capital tied up in the real-estate footprint while still maintaining a good portion of the revenue.

 

Seems like a great move to me as they slowly wind down Sears physical presence. Haven't owned the stock since the 2014 rights offering that left a bad taste in my mouth, but I'm considering rolling some of these puts into an underlying position in the common to have the upside that may come from an accelerated wind-down that they seem to be gearing up for.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SHLD selling Kenmore on Amazon… Isn’t this just giving customers one less reason to go to a Sears store?

 

Yes....

 

And one more reason to continue closing down the stores and recognize the value/capital tied up in the real-estate footprint while still maintaining a good portion of the revenue.

 

Seems like a great move to me as they slowly wind down Sears physical presence. Haven't owned the stock since the 2014 rights offering that left a bad taste in my mouth, but I'm considering rolling some of these puts into an underlying position in the common to have the upside that may come from an accelerated wind-down that they seem to be gearing up for.

 

Question is, does lower foot traffic properly compensated with higher online sales? Otherwise, higher cash burn from stores keeps eating into whatever value there is in real estate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SHLD selling Kenmore on Amazon… Isn’t this just giving customers one less reason to go to a Sears store?

 

Yes....

 

And one more reason to continue closing down the stores and recognize the value/capital tied up in the real-estate footprint while still maintaining a good portion of the revenue.

 

Seems like a great move to me as they slowly wind down Sears physical presence. Haven't owned the stock since the 2014 rights offering that left a bad taste in my mouth, but I'm considering rolling some of these puts into an underlying position in the common to have the upside that may come from an accelerated wind-down that they seem to be gearing up for.

 

Question is, does lower foot traffic properly compensated with higher online sales? Otherwise, higher cash burn from stores keeps eating into whatever value there is in real estate.

 

I don't disagree in the near term. Any acceleration in losses at the individual stores SHOULD translate into an acceleration of the liquidation process.

 

Eddie couldn't justify putting tens of thousands out of their livelihood to get at the real estate, particularly if a store was modestly profitable or breakeven. But if the economics of the stores deteriorates, you are now covered to close the location because nobody expects you to operate at a loss.

 

This IS the bullish scenario for those who want to get at the real estate - Sears online cannibalizing it's own physical stores so you can close the store, unlock the value of the real estate, and still keep a portion of the revenues.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...