Jump to content

SHLDQ - Sears Holdings Corp


alertmeipp

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 9.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Alright, in last year's third quarter SHLD's cash burn was $1.042 billion. What's the over/under for this year?

 

Q2)  What's the over under on number of posts related to what the definition of 'cash burn' is?

 

Cash burn = negative free cash flow = cash flow from operating activities less capital expenditures (let's stick with standard textbook definitions here... you'll get plenty of other made-up metrics in the quarterly powerpoint presentation they post)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My guess is that it will be a mixed bag (over which we will argue wether it's positive or negative ;)). As interest rates went down YOY SHLD will have to make adjustments to their pension liabilities, and, in turn, make higher contributions. Since contributions to those liabilities are regarded as cash burn by most people this will offset a lessening of negative cash flows from operations (= my guess). For me, this would be a very good sign but I guess it wouldn't be for peridotcapital, because the overall "cash burn rate" would remain constant.

 

Market reactions will largely depend on whether there is a sign of operations recovering and further information with regard to the RE transaction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest wellmont

Alright, in last year's third quarter SHLD's cash burn was $1.042 billion. What's the over/under for this year?

 

Q2)  What's the over under on number of posts related to what the definition of 'cash burn' is?

 

Cash burn = negative free cash flow = cash flow from operating activities less capital expenditures (let's stick with standard textbook definitions here... you'll get plenty of other made-up metrics in the quarterly powerpoint presentation they post)

in the words of Bono, "more than a lot".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gross margin 22.2% at a 10 year low.

 

Store count decrease is not translating to improvement in performance. Sears is looking like a weight lifting snowman in a hot sun.

 

Vish_ram, how many of those stores were closed early in the Q3 period or prior?  I wouldn't expect store closures for 2014 to really hit the bottom-line until Q1 2015.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gross margin 22.2% at a 10 year low.

 

Store count decrease is not translating to improvement in performance. Sears is looking like a weight lifting snowman in a hot sun.

 

Vish_ram, how many of those stores were closed early in the Q3 period or prior?  I wouldn't expect store closures for 2014 to really hit the bottom-line until Q1 2015.

 

Here is from the earnings transcript:

 

"I mentioned earlier, we have announced plans to close about 235 underperforming stores in 2014, having closed about 129 to date. In fiscal 2013, these stores generated almost $1.9 billion in sales; however, they produced an EBITDA loss of about $50 million. By closing these locations, we would expect to generate approximately $50 million of incremental EBITDA on an annualized basis by avoiding the losses they currently produce. Furthermore, closing these locations is expected to reduce our working capital requirements by about $300 million in 2014."

 

As you can see, closing stores alone would not make much difference in bottom line. As Eddie went on to say, it will make difference when they retain those customers (and future sales) through SYW.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gross margin 22.2% at a 10 year low.

 

Store count decrease is not translating to improvement in performance. Sears is looking like a weight lifting snowman in a hot sun.

 

Vish_ram, how many of those stores were closed early in the Q3 period or prior?  I wouldn't expect store closures for 2014 to really hit the bottom-line until Q1 2015.

 

 

sorry, I was referring to the closures that they've done in past years. My thesis is that we are witnessing diseconomies of scale. The first symptom is the gross margin %, next is operating margin %. They are on a constant decline.

 

The gross margin decline may point to the loss of volume discounts (as sales shrinks) and op margin % decline may point to failure to cut costs at same rate of sales decline (negative leverage). An example could be a warehouse that serves 5 locations. you may shut down 1, but warehouse operating expenses may remain the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

What on earth?  Acquisitions?  I read that as being trained on the retail area though, don't you?

 

This is nothing new.  He has mentioned it previously.  From the call this past May...

 

"These initiatives, when coupled with executing on the profitability framework I just described, will position us to play offense, enable us to continue to seek opportunities to grow, and invest in our business through acquisitions and other strategic relationships.

 

As I indicated earlier, as changes occur in and around retail, we intend to be in the mix focused on investments and acquisitions that accelerate and improve our transformation. Again, we are focused on making a profit, and we expect to continue to focus on our strengths, including increased focused on our best members, best stores, and best categories."

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not Spam

 

Might be a stretch, but:

 

Prestige Holdings is in Miami,

 

Kamlani's linkedin page has him in Miami https://www.linkedin.com/pub/kunal-s-kamlani/1a/68/5ba

 

Fairholme foundation is large donor to Gulliver Schools

 

A Kunal Kamlani is also listed as a donor

 

Kunal is the 8th director. If he was added because of Berkowitz, that would mean at least 2 out of the 8 (25%) are from Berkowitz which also coincides with his share ownership percentage of 25%.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not Spam

 

Might be a stretch, but:

 

Prestige Holdings is in Miami,

 

Kamlani's linkedin page has him in Miami https://www.linkedin.com/pub/kunal-s-kamlani/1a/68/5ba

 

Fairholme foundation is large donor to Gulliver Schools

 

A Kunal Kamlani is also listed as a donor

 

Kunal is the 8th director. If he was added because of Berkowitz, that would mean at least 2 out of the 8 (25%) are from Berkowitz which also coincides with his share ownership percentage of 25%.

 

Sorry, my mistake.  I didn't see the connection.  I'll let the moderator know.  Thanks for speaking up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alright, in last year's third quarter SHLD's cash burn was $1.042 billion. What's the over/under for this year?

 

Q2)  What's the over under on number of posts related to what the definition of 'cash burn' is?

 

:)

Defining ‘Cash Flow’ Burn

http://blog.searsholdings.com/shc-updates/defining-cash-flow-burn/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+SHCSpeaks+%28SHC+Speaks%29

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Per the latest 10-Q:

 

-Stockholders’ equity declined 95% from $2.3 billion to $126 million in the last year.

-Free cash flow was negative $2.1 billion for the last nine months.

-Gross margins dropped from 24.5% to 22.4%.

-The company has $2.2 billion of debt due in the next 12 months but only $326 million of cash on hand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...