Jump to content

What are you buying today?


LowIQinvestor

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 6.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I LOVE CARNAGE! GIVE ME MORE! LET THERE BE BLOOD IN THE STREETS!  ;D

 

I LOVE CANADA!

 

...

 

oh wait.

 

You said CARNAGE.

 

Never mind.

BRK, WFC, AAPL.

 

Not as much as i wanted because Jurgis was buying today moved the market.

 

 

 

When a guy has to buy, a guy has to buy.  8)

 

Honestly, a stint of good humor in this carnage does not harm anyone. -Which also brings me to the point: What have you been buying today, Jurgis? [The answer for my own part to that particular question is: Nothing].

 

Sorry, but I don't post day-to-day purchases and sales.

 

I'll post my monthly activity as always on SI and my blog.

 

IMO nobody should follow what I buy or sell or base any decisions on that.  8)

 

Everything I posted to rb is true. To some degree.  8)

 

 

I'll let it go from here, and stay away from it here on CoBF going forward, as useless, from my own personal perspective.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I put 85% of my portfolio into BIL today. This is the 3 month treasury bill ETF.

I am not seeing a lot of opportunities right now, so I am patiently waiting and spending a lot of time researching.

For people who bought AAPL thinking it is cheap, don't forget Cisco lost 90% in 2000 before it turns back up. AAPL changed its reporting metrics. This is a big red flag.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What was Cisco’s P/E or EV/EBIT before it collapsed ?

 

Over the past 10 years, I've seen two kinds of collapses. First is sky high valuation followed by disillusioned shareholders. Second is stock moving lower first, and value investors screaming bargain all the way down, while E continues to deteriorate. I think AAPL is in the second basket. The problem with valuation with P/E is that you have to be damn sure that E is going to go up, not down. AAPL is changing reporting standards. That's a tip off that the next few Es will be bad.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What was Cisco’s P/E or EV/EBIT before it collapsed ?

 

Over the past 10 years, I've seen two kinds of collapses. First is sky high valuation followed by disillusioned shareholders. Second is stock moving lower first, and value investors screaming bargain all the way down, while E continues to deteriorate. I think AAPL is in the second basket. The problem with valuation with P/E is that you have to be damn sure that E is going to go up, not down. AAPL is changing reporting standards. That's a tip off that the next few Es will be bad.

 

No opinion on whether Apple is this second kind of stock or not, but the comparison to Cisco in 2000 is just ridiculous. I think even Apple bears would find it so. Two totally different situations and valuations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What was Cisco’s P/E or EV/EBIT before it collapsed ?

 

Over the past 10 years, I've seen two kinds of collapses. First is sky high valuation followed by disillusioned shareholders. Second is stock moving lower first, and value investors screaming bargain all the way down, while E continues to deteriorate. I think AAPL is in the second basket. The problem with valuation with P/E is that you have to be damn sure that E is going to go up, not down. AAPL is changing reporting standards. That's a tip off that the next few Es will be bad.

 

It seems AAPL got a whole lot more popular(especially around here) once Warren capitulated and bought in big. You'd think there wasn't even a bear case anymore the past year, which is odd because there was the entire way up when Icahn owned it. Just my lazy guess, but Buffett's buying spree probably put $50 a share on this that wouldn't have been there otherwise...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What was Cisco’s P/E or EV/EBIT before it collapsed ?

 

Over the past 10 years, I've seen two kinds of collapses. First is sky high valuation followed by disillusioned shareholders. Second is stock moving lower first, and value investors screaming bargain all the way down, while E continues to deteriorate. I think AAPL is in the second basket. The problem with valuation with P/E is that you have to be damn sure that E is going to go up, not down. AAPL is changing reporting standards. That's a tip off that the next few Es will be bad.

 

It seems AAPL got a whole lot more popular(especially around here) once Warren capitulated and bought in big. You'd think there wasn't even a bear case anymore the past year, which is odd because there was the entire way up when Icahn owned it. Just my lazy guess, but Buffett's buying spree probably put $50 a share on this that wouldn't have been there otherwise...

There were people here joyfully buying AAPL way before Buffett got into it. I foolishly wasn't one of them. But in the past even if I wasn't a believer in Apple, I came close to buying a few times just because it was so damn cheap.

 

Of course a stamp from Buffett would move the thesis. Berkshire has never made a mistake with this much capital. I'd venture out to say and Buffett will agree that the Buffett buying spree happened because that extra $50 or more per share should have been there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What was Cisco’s P/E or EV/EBIT before it collapsed ?

 

Over the past 10 years, I've seen two kinds of collapses. First is sky high valuation followed by disillusioned shareholders. Second is stock moving lower first, and value investors screaming bargain all the way down, while E continues to deteriorate. I think AAPL is in the second basket. The problem with valuation with P/E is that you have to be damn sure that E is going to go up, not down. AAPL is changing reporting standards. That's a tip off that the next few Es will be bad.

 

It seems AAPL got a whole lot more popular(especially around here) once Warren capitulated and bought in big. You'd think there wasn't even a bear case anymore the past year, which is odd because there was the entire way up when Icahn owned it. Just my lazy guess, but Buffett's buying spree probably put $50 a share on this that wouldn't have been there otherwise...

There were people here joyfully buying AAPL way before Buffett got into it. I foolishly wasn't one of them. But in the past even if I wasn't a believer in Apple, I came close to buying a few times just because it was so damn cheap.

 

Of course a stamp from Buffett would move the thesis. Berkshire has never made a mistake with this much capital. I'd venture out to say and Buffett will agree that the Buffett buying spree happened because that extra $50 or more per share should have been there.

 

Wasn't referring to anyone specific in the above. Just an observation. The growth slowdown is obviously nothing new. It just seemed that this worry became less relevant in the past year, coinciding with Buffett buying and the stock going on a tear. I'm a younger dude, but I've never seen Warren fly into a position like he did with this one. I find it interesting to observe from afar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just off the top of my head American Express (more than once), Coke, and Wells Fargo were also fly into them positions. It's Warren's style when he figures a really good deal. He can't help himself.

 

I think this is true, rb,

 

I'll just add one more "more than once" here: Geico. Market value YE 1995 for about half of Geico: USD 2,393.2 M, cost 45.7 M [<-!]. After which he poured USD 2.3 B into it the next year to own the whole thing. Talk to me about averaging up. Crazy stuff. Flirting with it and going heavy on it when he was a young man, too.

 

I can almost picture him blowing the smoke away from the muzzle of his gun after the second shot, thinking : "Got you, now your mine - I own your butt, you ... beauty."

 

From the 1995 Annual report Shareholder Letter:

 

... Even so, we do have a few advantages, perhaps the greatest being that we don't have a strategic plan.  Thus we feel no need to proceed in an ordained direction (a course leading almost invariably to silly purchase prices) but can instead simply decide what makes sense for our owners. ...

 

... Talking to Time Magazine a few years back, Peter Drucker got to the heart of things:  "I will tell you a secret: Dealmaking beats working.  Dealmaking is exciting and fun, and working is grubby.  Running anything is primarily an enormous amount of grubby detail work . . . dealmaking is romantic, sexy.  That's why you have deals that make no sense." ...

 

-I love it! [ : - D]

 

- - - o 0 o - - -

 

Edit:

 

Ceico market price was actually up ~26% at YE1995 because of Bershire's bid for for the last half. Source. [<- H/T Cigarbutt.]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was put to on all my short puts in AAPL, BAC and WFC, having expected on Thursday that it would take quite a large Friday drop to be exercised on anything other than BAC. That drop happened and the stocks were in my account on Saturday.

 

AAPL effective price $167.62. Latest price $168.09

BAC effective price $26.07. Friday price $25.42

WFC effective price $49.92. Friday price $50.25

 

Wrote some 7 December cash covered puts on

AAPL 170 strike for $2.38

BAC 26.50 strike for $0.43

 

Hat tip to boilermaker75 for this approach to opening long positions.

Sold some WFC $50.50 strike 7 December puts for $0.58 while I was out during my vacation thanks to a GTC limit order.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been put to on several positions the last couple of expirations. Some I am keeping, positions I wanted to add to. Some I have turned around and sold covered calls on. If these are positions you wanted to add to, these could be good prices. If not, you could get some pretty good call premiums. For instance the Dec 14, 170-strike AAPL calls are going for $3 per share. The Dec 14, 50.50 strike WFC calls are going for $0.83 per share.

 

I was put to on all my short puts in AAPL, BAC and WFC, having expected on Thursday that it would take quite a large Friday drop to be exercised on anything other than BAC. That drop happened and the stocks were in my account on Saturday.

 

AAPL effective price $167.62. Latest price $168.09

BAC effective price $26.07. Friday price $25.42

WFC effective price $49.92. Friday price $50.25

 

Wrote some 7 December cash covered puts on

AAPL 170 strike for $2.38

BAC 26.50 strike for $0.43

 

Hat tip to boilermaker75 for this approach to opening long positions.

Sold some WFC $50.50 strike 7 December puts for $0.58 while I was out during my vacation thanks to a GTC limit order.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do like all these fairly well, but BAC more than AAPL or WFC at these prices. While I am not on margin, and actually still have some cash exposure, I have been thinking about your previous posts about getting onto 25% margin then getting off margin using covered calls.

 

I've been thinking about this mainly if I get too much exposure, as selling covered calls is the other side of the same coin and is something I might well consider given the high annualised return available to have a few more bites of the cherry before I settle on the positions and exposures I want at really cheap prices.

 

I might well place some orders and either earn some extra income on my positions or get called for a pretty good short-term profit, which has no more tax consequence in the UK than a long-term profit. Then I can return to selling puts for more income, which I might also do this week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...