Jump to content

What are you buying today?


LowIQinvestor

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 6.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

GME.  ;)

 

Just a few shares in the 70s as an option on volatility.

 

Mark Cuban made some interesting points on the WSB AMA this morning.

 

What points did you find interesting?

 

Less his logic and more that he was encouraging them to HODL even after the big price drop today. Which will give them the motivation to continue to try to pump it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

GME.  ;)

 

Just a few shares in the 70s as an option on volatility.

 

Mark Cuban made some interesting points on the WSB AMA this morning.

 

What points did you find interesting?

 

Less his logic and more that he was encouraging them to HODL even after the big price drop today. Which will give them the motivation to continue to try to pump it.

 

I wish we had current short interest data that we could trust. Hard to have conviction without that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea, seems delightfully boring way to make 5-7%/year, quasi bond / widows and orphan type stock. Why is it down 40% in the past year and at 2010 prices. This is much more than XLU.

 

I’m assuming it’s a “natural gas is going away” sell-off, but is there something more

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea, seems delightfully boring way to make 5-7%/year, quasi bond / widows and orphan type stock. Why is it down 40% in the past year and at 2010 prices. This is much more than XLU.

 

I’m assuming it’s a “natural gas is going away” sell-off, but is there something more

 

Beyond that, their debt maturity schedule is not protected against the inflation/high-interest rate scenario.  They have also been printing shares.  I haven't looked far back, but assuming company DNA has been consistent, these issues were probably there in the past too.

 

I understand these two issues don't matter to a lot of folks but just wanted to share my perspective.

 

Also, Seattle recently banned use of natural gas for new commercial and apartment buildings taller than three stories and replacement heating systems in older buildings: https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/seattle-city-council-passes-measure-to-end-most-natural-gas-use-in-commercial-buildings-and-some-apartments/

 

I wouldn't be surprised if Oregon and Washington states or other NW cities follow with some type of restriction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Topicus

 

Although it’s likely going lower in the short term seems like a pretty good deal.

 

I am interested in TOI, but wonder if you notice this section in page 14 of the prospectus which mentions a EUR$200M drawdown of the credit facility prior to the completion of spin-off?  Maybe I understood it wrong, but that would make the EV even higher than implied in the 2020Q3 financials.  38x EV/LTM FCF @$59 share price.

TOI.png.389048137c39017322ff5a186360639a.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Also, Seattle recently banned use of natural gas for new commercial and apartment buildings taller than three stories and replacement heating systems in older buildings: https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/seattle-city-council-passes-measure-to-end-most-natural-gas-use-in-commercial-buildings-and-some-apartments/

 

I wouldn't be surprised if Oregon and Washington states or other NW cities follow with some type of restriction.

 

Wow that's insane! I didn't believe you until I read the article, hehe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea, seems delightfully boring way to make 5-7%/year, quasi bond / widows and orphan type stock. Why is it down 40% in the past year and at 2010 prices. This is much more than XLU.

 

I’m assuming it’s a “natural gas is going away” sell-off, but is there something more

 

so just glancing at the financials over 2010-2019 years:

 

Revenue / share: $30--->$25

Operating income: $6--->$4.8

NI                      : $2.7-->$2.4

Divvy                0.43 / q to 0.48 / q

 

it doesn't seem to be growing at all, whereas utilities index (and of course Berkshire Energy) are actually growing.

 

with an additional 10 mins of work it seems like the big underperformance is warranted.

 

Any thoughts Castanza?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More FFH.TO.  It went from a 1% to 10% position over past few weeks.  It is getting kind of stupid now but maybe I am missing something.  There are underlying securities are doing so well, even BB while down from the highs is more than a double from where it was last time book was reported.  Even if they did 0 hedging on BB FFH is cheap cheap cheap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea, seems delightfully boring way to make 5-7%/year, quasi bond / widows and orphan type stock. Why is it down 40% in the past year and at 2010 prices. This is much more than XLU.

 

I’m assuming it’s a “natural gas is going away” sell-off, but is there something more

 

so just glancing at the financials over 2010-2019 years:

 

Revenue / share: $30--->$25

Operating income: $6--->$4.8

NI                      : $2.7-->$2.4

Divvy                0.43 / q to 0.48 / q

 

it doesn't seem to be growing at all, whereas utilities index (and of course Berkshire Energy) are actually growing.

 

with an additional 10 mins of work it seems like the big underperformance is warranted.

 

Any thoughts Castanza?

 

Sorry, should have prefaced that this was a watch position. The 10 year low and RNG approval this July (Oregon SB98) caught my attention, along with their move into water utilities. But as LearningMachine pointed out, the share dilution (1%) yearly since 2013 (as far back as I looked) is unsettling. I think the affects of Seattle banning nat gas in certain new construction are still unknown. 

 

@LearningMachine, where did you find the info on interest rates and their lack of protection if you don't mind sharing.

 

This area of the country is interesting regarding new energy regulations and hopefully it presents some opportunities. I agree that this is not great at current prices. Might revisit if this continues to go lower though.

 

Latest slide deck https://s23.q4cdn.com/611156738/files/doc_presentations/2020/Sept-IR-Deck_Final.pdf?source=content_type%3Areact%7Cfirst_level_url%3Aarticle%7Csection%3Amain_content%7Cbutton%3Abody_link

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Topicus

 

Although it’s likely going lower in the short term seems like a pretty good deal.

 

I am interested in TOI, but wonder if you notice this section in page 14 of the prospectus which mentions a EUR$200M drawdown of the credit facility prior to the completion of spin-off?  Maybe I understood it wrong, but that would make the EV even higher than implied in the 2020Q3 financials.  38x EV/LTM FCF @$59 share price.

 

I did not notice that.  What is your FCF number at LTM? 

 

I think their Dec 2019 quarter FCF is relatively anemic, I get around 32x FCF after adjusting for the debt and doing LTM (net debt, preferred, and the dividend you mentioned).  The number I get is 27x when I do 9 months CF annualized.  But maybe I did something wrong. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@LearningMachine, where did you find the info on interest rates and their lack of protection if you don't mind sharing.

 

LearningMachine is somewhat obsessed with the risk of rolling over debt at higher coupons and has a much different than market view of interest rates.

 

I think most would look at the debt stack here and conclude the opposite. NWN's lowest coupon is 2.82% and highest coupon is 9.0%. Its spreads range from 86 - 150 bps and prices on the bonds range from $101 to $144 because of the well above market coupons. Maturities are well laddered. About 60% matures in 10 years or more.

 

The coupons over the next few years are 9%, 3.1%, 3.5%, 5.6%, 7.7%, 6.5% , 7.0%, 3.2% , 7.0% (that gets you to 2027). I would wager with 90% probability that interest cost will decrease for this AA rated regulated utility company, if not significantly. I admittedly don't know how passing on interest cost/savings to customers works at utilites

 

There is a remote chance he is right and these are below market when they roll, but this is a tail macro scenario that applies to all companies with debt that isn't super long term.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LearningMachine is somewhat obsessed with the risk of rolling over debt at higher coupons and has a much different than market view of interest rates.

 

This is not a fully accurate statement of my view.  A more accurate statement would be that I would like to make sure I'm covered for the probability that inflation/interest-rates will sneak up on us by making sure debt maturities are much longer term. 

 

If the probability doesn't come through, it should still be a reasonable investment.  If probability comes through, it should be a reasonable investment then also.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@LearningMachine, where did you find the info on interest rates and their lack of protection if you don't mind sharing.

 

Castanza, I found the maturity schedule in their annual report, page 109: https://s23.q4cdn.com/611156738/files/annual/716f1951-3453-912b-2656-5c75ca7f5fa0.PDF.

 

In today's environment of low interest rates, utilities should be able to have much longer term maturity at low interest rates to protect the shareholders.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this company has a WA maturity of 16.5 years and a weighted average coupon of 4.5% and is a low spread IG issuer.

 

If I look at page 109 of their annual report, I get about 55% of debt due within 10 years and a weighted maturity of 13.29 years.

 

Please see https://s23.q4cdn.com/611156738/files/annual/716f1951-3453-912b-2656-5c75ca7f5fa0.PDF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...