Jump to content

What are you buying today?


LowIQinvestor

Recommended Posts

AXP also

 

So, I have looked at and rejected AXP before (maybe because I was stupid) but I ran the calculations again to day and it seems incredibly cheap. I will be happy if you guys can point out if I am being stupid again.

 

This data is from morningstar.

 

Metric    2005    2014

FCF        $7.4B    $9.7B

Revenue $23B      $34B

Shares    1.25B      1B

 

The company has grown at around 4% compounded (both FCF as well as Revenues are up 50% in 10 years). They have additionally returned some value via share-buybacks. Buying 20% of the company in 10 years. And they are paying a dividend (after tax) of around 1%. So, a back of the envelope kind of calculation means the company is expected to return the following to the shareholders

 

4% (growth) + 1% (dividend) + 2% (buybacks) = 7%

 

Let us now look at what we are paying for it.

 

Market Cap : + $72B

 

2014 Annual report figures:

Cash: - $22B

Customer Loans : - $69B

Customer Deposits: + $44B

Account receivable: - $44B

Debt : + $58B

 

= $39B

 

That can't be right ... Is there a mistake somewhere ?

 

Edit : So, I see my mistake a bit. The company is kind of taking money from the market as debt and giving it as loan to the loan-card holders. Given that this is the business model I can't really add and subtract like this. But then I need to think on how to value this.

 

The company is paying 2.34% on its debt (2014 figure) and receiving ~ 8.3% in interest on the loans it has given to the customers. So, it is earning around 5% for the service (approximately $3.5B a year with $69B loan). If this stream does not grow *at all* and at 15% discount rate this part of the business is worth approximately 3.5 * 1/(1.15-1) = $23B.

 

Looking at the income statement, the non-interest revenue - all expenses  = $5B. Again, at 15% discount rate, this stub is worth = $33B

 

And now, with $22B cash on balance sheet, I should be willing to pay ($23 + $33 + $22) B = $78B. Phew ... this seems closer to the market value.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 6.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I think I would just look at it on a rough FCF yield and then add expected growth/decline (4%?). And make sure you don't double count FCF by adding in FCF/share growth due to buybacks. We should probably move the discussion to the investment board but you might also want to have an opinion on the credit cycle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sold VALE 11/20/15 PUTS @ 4 for $0.25

Doubled my SPY short today. Also sold FCAU 11/20/15 PUTS @12 for $0.60.

Sold BBRY 11/20/15 PUTS @ $7 for $0.67.

sold WFM 11/20/15 CALLS @ 35 for $0.45

 

Sold ACI 11/20/15 PUTS @ 2 for $0.30

Last set of puts worked out pretty well. Sold 10/16 puts @ 4 for $1.00 when it was at $6+. Incredible that the stock can fall 50% and you still make 25% in a month by selling puts.

 

Bankruptcy is a real risk here but selling puts is more attractive to outright equity exposure which is what my passive P/B strategy would have me doing. I think the puts are a better option for exposure at this point until the bankruptcy/debt swap issues are worked out and then I'll probably roll the exposure into equity.

 

Sold more FCAU options. 12/18/2015 PUTS @ 15 for $0.85.

Also sold CHK 12/18/2015 PUTS @ 5 for $0.21

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sold VALE 11/20/15 PUTS @ 4 for $0.25

Doubled my SPY short today. Also sold FCAU 11/20/15 PUTS @12 for $0.60.

Sold BBRY 11/20/15 PUTS @ $7 for $0.67.

sold WFM 11/20/15 CALLS @ 35 for $0.45

 

Sold ACI 11/20/15 PUTS @ 2 for $0.30

Last set of puts worked out pretty well. Sold 10/16 puts @ 4 for $1.00 when it was at $6+. Incredible that the stock can fall 50% and you still make 25% in a month by selling puts.

 

Bankruptcy is a real risk here but selling puts is more attractive to outright equity exposure which is what my passive P/B strategy would have me doing. I think the puts are a better option for exposure at this point until the bankruptcy/debt swap issues are worked out and then I'll probably roll the exposure into equity.

 

Sold more FCAU options. 12/18/2015 PUTS @ 15 for $0.85.

Also sold CHK 12/18/2015 PUTS @ 5 for $0.21

 

Sold about 40% of my Posco position today after selling about 10% a week ago. I generally think I've been wrong here. China may have slowed production, but the drop in domestic demand more than compensated for that drop leaving the market still flooded with steel. Also, my sizing of the position was too large not to be reducing into some strength given how wrong I've been even if the price remains cheap :/

 

The proceeds pay down some margin and about half of it went into increasing my allocation to WFM by 25%. Considered options given the technical pressure I'm expecting from repurchasing 10-12% of your shares in a 6 month period but I don't have the conviction to play the short term options market and LEAPs don't give me any margin credit. WFM is now a 5% cost-basis position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been busy the last few weeks:

 

Sold 25% of Bidvest - Still my 2/3 largest holding but I don't think a US rate hike is going to help the ZAR:US rate.

 

Sold $16 and $17 Nov covered calls on Fiat before the RACE spin off. I bought back the $16's for a nickle.

 

Sold $17.5 Dec covered calls for ~1.3 on all but 100 shares of CHEF after the 20% jump yesterday.

 

CHKDG is now my largest holding - I am thinking about paring this back a little and buying the 2020 bonds yielding 10.5% and more KMI

 

Bought a little BAM

 

Top 5 holdings are CHKDG, LKQ, BDVSY, AXP, BRK/B put spreads. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brk.b

 

Certainly does look cheap.

 

Sold MON a few weeks ago and added to FICO today.

 

Schwab, since you know fico well, why aren't they exhibiting any operating leverage yet(sga seems to be a problem ) . if you look at EFX which uses Fico algorithms for its services , they seem to exhibit operating leverage. Just wanted to know your thoughts on this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Schwab711

Brk.b

 

Certainly does look cheap.

 

Sold MON a few weeks ago and added to FICO today.

 

Schwab, since you know fico well, why aren't they exhibiting any operating leverage yet(sga seems to be a problem ) . if you look at EFX which uses Fico algorithms for its services , they seem to exhibit operating leverage. Just wanted to know your thoughts on this.

 

Operating leverage is never going to be as large as you'd think (if you picture FICO as just credit scores). Apps/Tools use basically the same developers/architecture (from what I understand). So application revenue is flat because customers are switching to cloud solutions (Tools). It's best to look at Apps/Tools and Scores separately.

 

Also, 2015 was a major investment year. They spent $18m on severance to remove 100 jobs and hire 60 sales folks to replace them. We are looking at Affinity contracts being signed sometime in 2016 (with rev beginning in 2017) and pronounced shift to royalty-like revenue for scores and software. R&D was +20%. If you wanted to adj R&D down and remove the restructuring then you can see the signs of future operating leverage.

 

In 2016 (and more surely, 2017), SG&A will be more proportional to sales, R&D should be down, "sticky" revenue should make a greater %, and revenue growth should start to approach high single-digits or low double-digits. FICO still has the potential to sign the other two credit bureaus to the same plan as Experian. As more companies transition to AWS/cloud, FICO's cloud (Tools) solutions should become game-changers as there really isn't a comp out there. Read about FICO's role in creating the NFL schedule to understand the benefits they provide.

 

I hope this helps. It's worth reading the recent conference call. They will be able to describe their business better than I ever could. I can't find a source now, but a few years ago FICO claimed the highest percentage of PhD mathematicians/employee ratio of all public companies. At times, it's noticeable (such as long periods of R&D and conservative guidance). I believe FICO has repurchased 70% of their shares outstanding since IPO and they are the perfect company to continue eating themselves.

 

http://seekingalpha.com/article/3654756-fair-isaac-fico-william-j-lansing-on-q4-2015-results-earnings-call-transcript

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...