Jump to content

AWLCF - Awilco Drilling


DTEJD1997

Recommended Posts

Issued today. Management had said that the work was ahead of schedule.

 

AWDR - Hess agreed to early release of WilHunter

Awilco Drilling PLC and Hess Limited have mutually agreed to release the WilHunter ahead of the 1st December 2015 contract date as a consequence of the successful early completion of the decommissioning program.  There will be no negative financial repercussions to either party as a result of this early release.

 

WilHunter is now moored at Invergordon and is being actively marketed against future opportunities.

 

WilHunter is one of Awilco Drilling's two Enhanced Pacesetter semi-submersibles and is equipped for operations in water depths up to 1,500ft.

 

Aberdeen, 31 July 2015

 

 

For further information please contact:

Jon Oliver Bryce, CEO

Phone: +44 1224 737900

 

Cathrine Haavind, IR Manager

Phone: +47 93 42 84 64

 

 

This information is subject of the disclosure requirements pursuant to section 5-12 of the Norwegian Securities Trading Act.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Replies 546
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 4 weeks later...

I had this previously in my RRSP and there was no tax withheld on the dividends.

 

So it is considered a qualified investment for TFSA/RRSP? I read that the security has to be on a designated exchange, one of which is the Oslo exchange, although I don't own the shares outright, I own an OTC ADR. According to what I read, OTC securities are ineligible for registered accounts. I suppose the argument is that the underlying security trades on a designated exchange?

 

Designated exchanges: http://www.fin.gc.ca/act/fim-imf/dse-bvd-eng.asp

Qualified investments: http://www.taxtips.ca/rrsp/qualifiedinvestments.htm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had this previously in my RRSP and there was no tax withheld on the dividends.

 

So it is considered a qualified investment for TFSA/RRSP? I read that the security has to be on a designated exchange, one of which is the Oslo exchange, although I don't own the shares outright, I own an OTC ADR. According to what I read, OTC securities are ineligible for registered accounts. I suppose the argument is that the underlying security trades on a designated exchange?

 

Designated exchanges: http://www.fin.gc.ca/act/fim-imf/dse-bvd-eng.asp

Qualified investments: http://www.taxtips.ca/rrsp/qualifiedinvestments.htm

 

My understanding is that it has to be the same security. So if it has the same ISIN, you're fine. If it's actually an ADR, then generally speaking it isn't the same security.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hey all:

 

WOW, a great quarter!

 

Of course, this won't be repeated in the near future, as part of that is a one time payment.

 

Nice to get a $.50/share dividend.

 

A few interesting things I noticed...Cash now exceeds market cap of the company ($151MM vs. $135MM).

 

 

How is the balance sheet?  $151MM cash vs. debt of $105MM.

 

Contracted future revenue WELL exceeds market cap of the company ($276MM vs. $125MM).  Looking at latest quarters numbers, about half of this should be cash flow...And that is being extremely conservative.  Future cash flow from signed contracts should EASILY pay off the debt.  You then have $151MM in cash, management & two rigs.

 

BUT IT ALL DEPENDS ON THE PRICE OF OIL!

 

I just don't get it...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

 

The author's optimism on Awilco's ability to secure a contract for the second rig seems incredibly naive.  There are three other warm stacked rigs and six cold stacked rigs in the area with probably six more rigs ending contracts in the next few months.  Logic tells me that they all would rather be contracted at $175,000 per day versus just sitting.  The current market won't support it.  His Q4 estimate seems to ignore the rig going to the yard.  I expect them to lose money in the quarter.

 

The author does make a point on the value of the cash flow from the one rig should be over the next two years combined with Awilco's cash buffer.  Awilco has the cash to pay off their bond and pay for one rig's SPS and BOP.  The market has to improve because one rig at $215,000 per day is probably EPS break even.  I would expect the dividend to be cut below $0.25 per quarter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

http://www.osjonline.com/news/view,uk-to-lead-global-decommissioning-surge_41608.htm

 

DW anticipates that 146 platforms will be removed from the UK during 2019-2026 – that is 51 per cent of all UK platform removals over the forecast*. This is due to the high number of ageing platforms in the UK, which have an average age of over 20 years and are uneconomic at current commodity prices, as a result of high maintenance costs and the expensive production techniques required for mature fields. However, many of the largest platforms will remain in place until the 2030s, mainly due to tiebacks that have increased production late in life.

 

*Forecast period is 2016-2040

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 11 months later...

Hey all:

 

Anybody still watching this one?

 

They reported earnings today of $.50/share and a declared another dividend of $.20/share.

 

One rig is in cold storage...drilling activity is picking up a LITTLE BIT according to management...

 

If the 2nd rig can be put back into operation, AWLCF would certainly spike higher....

 

What are the odds?  1 in 10?  1 in 5?

 

I still think this is an interesting speculation on higher oil prices.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey all:

 

Anybody still watching this one?

 

They reported earnings today of $.50/share and a declared another dividend of $.20/share.

 

One rig is in cold storage...drilling activity is picking up a LITTLE BIT according to management...

 

If the 2nd rig can be put back into operation, AWLCF would certainly spike higher....

 

What are the odds?  1 in 10?  1 in 5?

 

I still think this is an interesting speculation on higher oil prices.

 

UK market is still oversupplied. Slide 14 kind of spells it out. Ideally one of the big players should be scrapping rigs. But things will eventually even out. 7 rigs will be out of contract by the end of this year. Leaving just 5 with firm contracts at the beginning of 2018, which would put us at parity in today's market. So really, this thing will really start to turn around once you see scrapping take place. Plus side for the WilPhoenix is the contact expires late Feb 2018, which if the rest of the 2017 fleet gets cold stacked, puts it in prime position to pick up additional seasonal work in 2018 when we should see day rates rising.

 

Other plus side, which they mentioned in the call is lots of M&A E&P activity in the UK North Sea, which is certainly a good thing for drillers. I'm wondering if they will be active again in trying to pick up rigs on the cheap or if they'll be looking to sell out during the next upcycle. Seems like it could go either way...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Has anyone done the math on this new contract?

 

The day rate is $116.7k and opex has been ~$67k per day so $18m per year at 100% utilization. SG&A is ~$2m per quarter and cold-stacking of WilHunter is ~$1m per year so we're at $9m in EBITDA. Interest is around $7m per year and capex $3m so we're running a $1m free cash flow deficit. They have cash = debt right now and will generate some $20m per quarter from 3Q17 to 1Q18 so in theory they could pay the debt down 100% which would leave FCF around $6m annually or $0.20/share.

 

Guess my point is that unless rig opex per day is going down or they're able to contract the other rig, still not a screaming bargain. And the dividend is definitely unsustainable at this new day rate.

 

Anyone else have thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has anyone done the math on this new contract?

 

The day rate is $116.7k and opex has been ~$67k per day so $18m per year at 100% utilization. SG&A is ~$2m per quarter and cold-stacking of WilHunter is ~$1m per year so we're at $9m in EBITDA. Interest is around $7m per year and capex $3m so we're running a $1m free cash flow deficit. They have cash = debt right now and will generate some $20m per quarter from 3Q17 to 1Q18 so in theory they could pay the debt down 100% which would leave FCF around $6m annually or $0.20/share.

 

Guess my point is that unless rig opex per day is going down or they're able to contract the other rig, still not a screaming bargain. And the dividend is definitely unsustainable at this new day rate.

 

Anyone else have thoughts?

 

I am going to guess that we will see the daily op-ex come down somewhat, along with all the other expenses. 

 

Obviously FCF is not going to be anything like what it was before, but there should be something.

 

If oil prices can rise a bit...that will increase the odds of the other rig being leased out.  If that happens, then that is truly a game changer.

 

With the existing lease, no more talk about the company being shut down or going out of business.  The business is viable for the next few years at least.

 

Management at AWLCF is excellent.  They managed to make it through the downturn, and still managed to pay a dividend (reduced).  Look at SDRL and their other competitors.  They went busto....AWLCF has made it through.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has anyone done the math on this new contract?

 

The day rate is $116.7k and opex has been ~$67k per day so $18m per year at 100% utilization. SG&A is ~$2m per quarter and cold-stacking of WilHunter is ~$1m per year so we're at $9m in EBITDA. Interest is around $7m per year and capex $3m so we're running a $1m free cash flow deficit. They have cash = debt right now and will generate some $20m per quarter from 3Q17 to 1Q18 so in theory they could pay the debt down 100% which would leave FCF around $6m annually or $0.20/share.

 

Guess my point is that unless rig opex per day is going down or they're able to contract the other rig, still not a screaming bargain. And the dividend is definitely unsustainable at this new day rate.

 

Anyone else have thoughts?

 

I agree. NPV of current contract cashflow is ~$2.20 per share, NPV of new contract is ~$0.50 per share. $0.20 / share excess current assets for a total of around $3. And that is assuming they cancel all debt quickly. Optional value of rig #2 is not that high given where day rates are. So, you are effectively paying a dollar per share for terminal value in 2021. Probably a bit cheapish but not a no-brainer.

 

If oil prices can rise a bit...that will increase the odds of the other rig being leased out.  If that happens, then that is truly a game changer.

Sure, but if your thesis boils down to "if oil prices can rise a bit" you might as well go long crude oil futures.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My math was the following:

 

Assuming they pay down all debt immediately (i.e. no interest expense)...

 

Current backlog should net ~$20m per quarter through 1Q18 for $60m / $2/share. New contract nets maybe $0.20/share in FCF per year assuming non-100% utilization, ~$67k rig opex per day, and continued cold-stacking of rig #2.

 

Under this scenario you're essentially pay 10x FCF on EV. Yes, they bought 3 years of time to market the other rig but that remains option value at this point. Seems like a pretty fair price >$4/share. Dividend likely goes to less than $0.20/share as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keeps the company a going concern. Had to be done. Like others have said allows management to be more judicious in bringing the other rig out of cold-stack. Also continues to reduce the available supply in the UK. With as much M&A going on in the North Sea (most of which is PE) they're going to want to see some ROI eventually.

 

I'm still hoping they can pick off another cheap rig or two during this down cycle. But my gut says they'll probably try selling out this time around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...