jeffmori7 Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 Unless they find something wrong with the car, I think it'll be a non-issue in the long run. Even the safest cars aren't invincible. If you cary around a lot of energy, either in a gas tank or a battery, there's potential for stuff to catch on fire. An engineering friend at Ballard told me that power density in Lithium ion batteries was an inherent problem as more density increases the risk of spontaneous combustion. Perhaps the problem is that there was too much pressure to extend range vs. preventing fire risk by reducing power density. Where I work they are working on lithium ion battery with impressive safety compared to what is available on the market today. I have seen some really nice videos, but so far, I haven't been able to find a public reference I could show you..I wil keep digging. edit: Ok I got some presentations ; http://www.advbe.com/docs/DeciElec2013-Karim-Zaghib-IREQ.pdf and http://www.emc-mec.ca/phev/Presentations_en/SW/PHEV09-W07_KarimZaghib.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rpadebet Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 I have one more. I promise this is the last one Tesla: Just to show you how serious we are about this environment thingy, without telling anyone we inserted a self destruct feature in there ala Mission Impossible 2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rkbabang Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 "the car's alert system signaled a problem and instructed the driver to pull over safely" At least you get a warning. "WARNING your car will self destruct in 20 seconds, WARNING your car will self destruct in 19 seconds, WARNING ..." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ERICOPOLY Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 There are 31 highway vehicle fires per hour. http://www.tkolb.net/tra_sch/carfires/index.html And none of them are Teslas. This one didn't happen on a highway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ERICOPOLY Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 That link I posed shows that 1/10 of 1% of vehicles catch fire annually on the highway. So we should expect greater than 20 Tesla fires annually now, going forward. Unless the lack of an internal combustion engine turns out to reduce the number of fires. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liberty Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 A search for "car fire" on youtube: https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=car+fire&page=&utm_source=opensearch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ERICOPOLY Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 So actually, if 1 in 1000 cars catch fire annually on the highway (as my link above suggests)... Then Tesla makes the least fire-prone cars? They've had a lot more than 1,000 average cars on the road over the past 12 months, but just 1 fire. Plus, the Roadsters never caught fire. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JBird Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 Good post Eric. But just double checking the math: Roughly 200,000 (unintentional) vehicle fires per year from 254 million cars, right? So 7/100 of 1%. If so, on 20,000 Tesla's we'd expect ~14 fires. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ERICOPOLY Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303722604579111052383880112.html?mod=WSJ_business_whatsNews Tesla Sedan Roars Ahead in Norway Norway Has Relatively Small Market But Buyers Are Affluent Let me guess why. 1) $10 a gallon for gas in Norway 2) No value added tax on electric vehicles making a Tesla Model S the same cost as a Volkswagon Passat 3) Great car 4) Cheap hydro-generated electricity What? The Tesla S is the same price as a Passat in Norway? :o $10/gal gas, $80,000.00 for a Passat. It's a wonder anyone can afford to drive at all. Well, here's a used 2013 Passat for $66,000: http://m.ooyyo.no/detail/c=CD17057114D9854F111B926FBAA6355BA3A21D6615F385/-4638969442466894224.html/# Very affordable! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hyten1 Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 folks you want to get even more technical simply using the stats is not sufficient enough to be more accurate you prob need to find same type of car by price, or compare to luxury sedans hy EDIT: i don't know the stats or did i look at it, does the stats break down by car type, what if a good portion or fire are trucks or small econo cars etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ERICOPOLY Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 folks you want to get even more technical simply using the stats is not sufficient enough to be more accurate you prob need to find same type of car by price, or compare to luxury sedans hy EDIT: i don't know the stats or did i look at it, does the stats break down by car type, what if a good portion or fire are trucks or small econo cars etc. I did find information that stated the majority of highway car fires were electrical in nature (bad wiring). So it might have to do with the age of the fleet. In other words, it takes a while for the insulation to go bad. But that probably degrades faster under extreme conditions (such as the heat from the internal combustion engine may encourage the degradation process). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rpadebet Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 I have a question about the relevance of these facts/stats here Why are we comparing the Tesla cars to other Internal combustion engine cars? Wasn't the main selling point, this is a paradigm shift and is more like the iPhone and we should really be thinking Tesla as a tech company? Since these cars use some sort of battery technology, isn't it a better comparison to use those Boeing aircraft's which seem to get grounded every now and then due to fire or those cases of smart phones with exploding batteries? Also pretty sure when the first Ford Pinto caught fire the highway stats were similar, that wasn't enough for that car to survive. PS: As for the counter view, I am also mindful I shouldn't be extrapolating one incident of fire and assuming it is some sort of widespread design issue. For all we know it could be a manufacturing defect in that one car. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ERICOPOLY Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 I have a question about the relevance of these facts/stats here Why are we comparing the Tesla cars to other Internal combustion engine cars? Wasn't the main selling point, this is a paradigm shift and is more like the iPhone and we should really be thinking Tesla as a tech company? Since these cars use some sort of battery technology, isn't it a better comparison to use those Boeing aircraft's which seem to get grounded every now and then due to fire or those cases of smart phones with exploding batteries? Also pretty sure when the first Ford Pinto caught fire the highway stats were similar, that wasn't enough for that car to survive. PS: As for the counter view, I am also mindful I shouldn't be extrapolating one incident of fire and assuming it is some sort of widespread design issue. For all we know it could be a manufacturing defect in that one car. Don't all cars use some sort of battery technology? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rkbabang Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 I have a question about the relevance of these facts/stats here Why are we comparing the Tesla cars to other Internal combustion engine cars? Wasn't the main selling point, this is a paradigm shift and is more like the iPhone and we should really be thinking Tesla as a tech company? Since these cars use some sort of battery technology, isn't it a better comparison to use those Boeing aircraft's which seem to get grounded every now and then due to fire or those cases of smart phones with exploding batteries? Also pretty sure when the first Ford Pinto caught fire the highway stats were similar, that wasn't enough for that car to survive. PS: As for the counter view, I am also mindful I shouldn't be extrapolating one incident of fire and assuming it is some sort of widespread design issue. For all we know it could be a manufacturing defect in that one car. Don't all cars use some sort of battery technology? Yes, but 12V lead-acid batteries aren't known for failing spectacularly. Google "laptop explodes" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ERICOPOLY Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 I have a question about the relevance of these facts/stats here Why are we comparing the Tesla cars to other Internal combustion engine cars? Wasn't the main selling point, this is a paradigm shift and is more like the iPhone and we should really be thinking Tesla as a tech company? Since these cars use some sort of battery technology, isn't it a better comparison to use those Boeing aircraft's which seem to get grounded every now and then due to fire or those cases of smart phones with exploding batteries? Also pretty sure when the first Ford Pinto caught fire the highway stats were similar, that wasn't enough for that car to survive. PS: As for the counter view, I am also mindful I shouldn't be extrapolating one incident of fire and assuming it is some sort of widespread design issue. For all we know it could be a manufacturing defect in that one car. Don't all cars use some sort of battery technology? Yes, but 12V lead-acid batteries aren't known for failing spectacularly. Google "laptop explodes" Laptop batteries aren't liquid cooled. Google "model S battery pack explodes". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ERICOPOLY Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 Actually, just Google for cars that caught fire without coolant. Here you go: Ford blames coolant system for Escape, Fusion fires http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/cars/2012/12/10/ford-recall-escape-fusion-ecoboost/1759063/ If the coolant boils over, the engine goes into extreme overheating, which can result in fluids leaking, coming into contact with the hot exhaust system and potentially causing a fire. Ford said it has seen 12 fires in Escapes and one in a Fusion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rpadebet Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 Actually, just Google for cars that caught fire without coolant. Here you go: Ford blames coolant system for Escape, Fusion fires http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/cars/2012/12/10/ford-recall-escape-fusion-ecoboost/1759063/ If the coolant boils over, the engine goes into extreme overheating, which can result in fluids leaking, coming into contact with the hot exhaust system and potentially causing a fire. Ford said it has seen 12 fires in Escapes and one in a Fusion. So is it possible that in an accident involving a Tesla vehicle, the battery pack gets punctured, the coolant leaks out, eventually the batteries get hot and then explode, causing the fire? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ERICOPOLY Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 Actually, just Google for cars that caught fire without coolant. Here you go: Ford blames coolant system for Escape, Fusion fires http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/cars/2012/12/10/ford-recall-escape-fusion-ecoboost/1759063/ If the coolant boils over, the engine goes into extreme overheating, which can result in fluids leaking, coming into contact with the hot exhaust system and potentially causing a fire. Ford said it has seen 12 fires in Escapes and one in a Fusion. So is it possible that in an accident involving a Tesla vehicle, the battery pack gets punctured, the coolant leaks out, eventually the batteries get hot and then explode, causing the fire? No, the Tesla car smashed into a Mercedes, rupturing it's fuel tank, and the Tesla car burned in the resulting gasoline fire long before the battery pack coolant leaked out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wisdom Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 From what I understand - most electrical batteries have this problem. One of the reasons Munger likes BYD is they claim to have virtually gotten rid of this problem with their battery technology. Even though BYD is the largest manufacturer of batteries for cell phones and laptops, they have had no instances of them catching fire even though the Japanese batteries have been known to burn up. Check out some of the test videos on BYD. There was a BYD taxi that had caught fire in a high speed crash - the Nissan GTR was reported to be travelling at 150kmph. Reports indicated that it was not related to the batteries even at that speed. Thus, BYD cars do not need as much protection from the batteries burning up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeffmori7 Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 From what I understand - most electrical batteries have this problem. One of the reasons Munger likes BYD is they claim to have virtually gotten rid of this problem with their battery technology. Even though BYD is the largest manufacturer of batteries for cell phones and laptops, they have had no instances of them catching fire even though the Japanese batteries have been known to burn up. Check out some of the test videos on BYD. There was a BYD taxi that had caught fire in a high speed crash - the Nissan GTR was reported to be travelling at 150kmph. Reports indicated that it was not related to the batteries even at that speed. Thus, BYD cars do not need as much protection from the batteries burning up. Exactly, we don't say something is wrong with Tesla batteries, or with this fire, but it is true that this is known problematic inherent to most batteries. But there is a lot of research on this, see the links I posted above. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ERICOPOLY Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 folks you want to get even more technical simply using the stats is not sufficient enough to be more accurate you prob need to find same type of car by price, or compare to luxury sedans hy EDIT: i don't know the stats or did i look at it, does the stats break down by car type, what if a good portion or fire are trucks or small econo cars etc. Do high priced cars catch fire less? Here is an $840,000 car that caught fire: http://www.autoguide.com/auto-news/2012/02/ferrari-ff-catches-fire-in-shanghai.html Worth about 5.3 million Chinese Yuan, or $840,000 USD, this is not the first FF to set itself on fire. Another FF suffered a similar fate last June, likely caused by defective heat reflectors surrounding the FF’s exhaust. Of course, the comparison to Model S may not be fair. The Model S does not have an exhaust system that could contribute to a fire. Oh wait, we don't worry about things we are familiar with. We only fear new and exotic ways to be killed. For example, if the risk is higher in being killed in a car crash on the way to the beach, we will instead not worry about that and only worry about the risk of a shark attack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ERICOPOLY Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 I have a question about the relevance of these facts/stats here Why are we comparing the Tesla cars to other Internal combustion engine cars? Wasn't the main selling point, this is a paradigm shift and is more like the iPhone and we should really be thinking Tesla as a tech company? Since these cars use some sort of battery technology, isn't it a better comparison to use those Boeing aircraft's which seem to get grounded every now and then due to fire or those cases of smart phones with exploding batteries? Also pretty sure when the first Ford Pinto caught fire the highway stats were similar, that wasn't enough for that car to survive. PS: As for the counter view, I am also mindful I shouldn't be extrapolating one incident of fire and assuming it is some sort of widespread design issue. For all we know it could be a manufacturing defect in that one car. Don't all cars use some sort of battery technology? Yes, but 12V lead-acid batteries aren't known for failing spectacularly. Google "laptop explodes" Here is a comment on lead acid batteries: Jeff Chamberlain, deputy director of the Joint Center for Energy Storage Research at Argonne National Lab in Illinois, said that like in any other battery fire, it comes down to a short circuit. "If you puncture any battery, whether it's lead-acid, alkaline or lithium-ion, you'll create a short circuit and make connections across interfaces that you should not be making." he said. "When that short occurs, it creates heat and energy, which causes the fire." http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/tesla-model-catch-fire/story?id=20462128 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liberty Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 Of course, the comparison to Model S may not be fair. The Model S does not have an exhaust system that could contribute to a fire. If you hit a large metal debris and it gets stuck under the car and dragged along, chances are that'll cause quite some sparks. In a normal collision you probably don't have that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liberty Posted October 4, 2013 Share Posted October 4, 2013 Letter by Elon Musk about the accident: http://www.businessinsider.com/model-s-fire-elon-musk-2013-10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grenville Posted October 4, 2013 Share Posted October 4, 2013 Letter by Elon Musk about the accident: http://www.businessinsider.com/model-s-fire-elon-musk-2013-10 Good information, thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now