LowIQinvestor Posted June 20, 2013 Share Posted June 20, 2013 Anyone have a good thesis on why Ted Weschler had a large position in this? What is the moat? They just surfaced in my research on large company buybacks and the current valuation looks intriguing. At an 8 PE it caught my attention and wanted to see if anyone is a shareholder or done any work on it. Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
watsa_is_a_randian_hero Posted June 20, 2013 Share Posted June 20, 2013 Its a cash cow (albeit a slowly dying cash cow). I owned the bonds a while back. They were due to get some huge cash settlement that was going to reduce net debt significantly. The bonds were junk bonds when I bought them; but they got an upgrade after they received that cash settlement a few years ago. That combined with the market rallying led the yields to come in significantly on it. I think it eventually was called. I've still followed the equity on it, but have never bought. Would want it cheaper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twacowfca Posted June 20, 2013 Share Posted June 20, 2013 Its a cash cow (albeit a slowly dying cash cow). I owned the bonds a while back. They were due to get some huge cash settlement that was going to reduce net debt significantly. The bonds were junk bonds when I bought them; but they got an upgrade after they received that cash settlement a few years ago. That combined with the market rallying led the yields to come in significantly on it. I think it eventually was called. I've still followed the equity on it, but have never bought. Would want it cheaper. We've advertised off and on with them over the years. Their core business has been coupon inserts in newspapers similar mass print media. It has been a cash cow, but likely giving less milk with digital competition. How have they done in recent years? They are probably worth a close look with Ted's interest. Has he bought them for BRK? If so how much? What does he see that others don't? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hubris Posted June 24, 2013 Share Posted June 24, 2013 High amortization expenses so the 8 P/E your looking at isn't anywhere near FCF... 5% dividend yield and aggressive buybacks. I personally think the dividend is stupid given the valuation they should have just stuck with the buyback. Their business is mainly driven by shared mail... They are also trying to grow the digital business in order to sell combined solutions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LowIQinvestor Posted December 18, 2013 Author Share Posted December 18, 2013 http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-12-18/valassis-will-be-acquired-by-harland-clarke-for-1-84-billion.html?cmpid=yhoo Valassis acquired Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now