Jump to content

screen stocks with negative enterprise value


roughlyright

Recommended Posts

oldschoolvalue has some great value screeners including a neg EV screen:

 

http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/stock-screener.php

 

...Also, here are some things to think about when it comes to neg EV stocks. The most important thing is to be aware of off balance sheet liabilities such as lease obligations.

 

http://aswathdamodaran.blogspot.ca/2008/12/entperise-value-is-negative-is-that.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, be warned that the reported returns to the strategy are likely somewhat overstated.  (I still think it's a very interesting area.)  Small cap work often runs into real trouble re: bid/ask spreads, data quality issues, survivorship bias, etc. 

 

But I hope Alon Bochman keeps working on what is an interesting area of research.  :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do a lot of negative EV type investing, seeing this research confirmed that I was on the right path.  I've used FT.com to find a lot of these companies, I'll checkout finviz.com as well.

 

Norm is right, there are a lot of issues with these things, especially data quality. There are some great negative EV stocks that never appear on screens.  Then some that appear on screens have the off balance sheet issue. 

 

I'm not sure this is as easy as buying a screen and sitting back, but it's a great starting point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've done a bit of this pure cash arb stuff as well.  Pretty similar to the standard net-net stuff in my opinion.  I'd say on the average neg EV Im doing much worse than 50%, but overall it seems to be working out.  Any investable neg EVs on your list right now Nate?  By investable, I mean no obvious red flags such as mega cash burn, or likely fraud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've done a bit of this pure cash arb stuff as well.  Pretty similar to the standard net-net stuff in my opinion.  I'd say on the average neg EV Im doing much worse than 50%, but overall it seems to be working out.  Any investable neg EVs on your list right now Nate?  By investable, I mean no obvious red flags such as mega cash burn, or likely fraud.

 

Agreed, it's similar to net-nets.  I ran a screen when this article came out, from what I saw 99% of the companies in the US were China frauds or companies with managements blatently stealing from shareholders.  There was some interesting looking stuff overseas.  I need to look for a few more of these.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you blainehodder, matjone and BobP for the links. I really liked the Finviz stock screener.

 

Oddballstocks, I am a big fan of your blog. Do you have any on your radar that have negative EV?

 

Nothing particularly on my radar, I was going to do a writeup of Titanium Holdings soon, that's a negative EV stock, maybe worth a look.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just found Emerson Radio (MSN) that meets req's.

 

There's some questions about msn. It may be entirely legitimate but it smelled pretty funky to me. Here's one article.

 

http://www.gurufocus.com/news/172206/a-stock-where-neither-the-business-nor-the-price-matters

 

This is why I don't blindly invest in US net-nets or negative EV stocks....MSN is one among many.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A valuation based screen that has performed well has been the AAII Shadow Portfolio.  This is an actual portfolio so doesn't have the theoretical issues of other screen-based performance measures. It has outperformed by 9.0% per year since inception in 1993.  Over the past 10-years it has outperformed by 12.5% per year.

 

Another interesting question is has anyone tried to value weight any of these screened portfolios to enhance performance?

 

Packer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A valuation based screen that has performed well has been the AAII Shadow Portfolio.  This is an actual portfolio so doesn't have the theoretical issues of other screen-based performance measures. It has outperformed by 9.0% per year since inception in 1993.  Over the past 10-years it has outperformed by 12.5% per year.

 

Another interesting question is has anyone tried to value weight any of these screened portfolios to enhance performance?

 

Packer

 

It is kind of funny because value weighting will surely demonstrate increased performance, but it will be even less realistic as the best values are the most illiquid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...