OracleofCarolina Posted October 23, 2013 Share Posted October 23, 2013 http://enhancecrackerbarrel.com/pdfs/CBRL_sh_special_dividend_letter.pdf Sardar saying he will now sign a contract not seeking board control if added to the board. As always, interesting to watch and I would never bet against Sardar, but I do not see how he will win the proxy vote with the CBRL stock doing so well. Cheers, Jason Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parsad Posted October 23, 2013 Share Posted October 23, 2013 http://enhancecrackerbarrel.com/pdfs/CBRL_sh_special_dividend_letter.pdf Sardar saying he will now sign a contract not seeking board control if added to the board. As always, interesting to watch and I would never bet against Sardar, but I do not see how he will win the proxy vote with the CBRL stock doing so well. Cheers, Jason That contract better be more binding than the paper it's written on. How many ways has he figured out how to get what he wants? If the CBRL board agrees to a contract, it will be a short tenure for the current board. Let's see if they are smarter than that! Cheers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sportgamma Posted October 23, 2013 Share Posted October 23, 2013 "Incontrovertibly" Thank you Sardar for exposing me to some fine English words that I otherwise never would have known existed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zorrofan Posted October 23, 2013 Share Posted October 23, 2013 I believe WEB once remarked that if you are playing poker and can't tell in the first 30 minutes who the patsy is, you're it.......something for the CBRL board to think about before agreeing to any request cheers, Zorro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
enoch01 Posted October 23, 2013 Share Posted October 23, 2013 I believe WEB once remarked that if you are playing poker and can't tell in the first 30 minutes who the patsy is, you're it.......something for the CBRL board to think about before agreeing to any request cheers, Zorro Although Sardar appears to speak non sibi, sed omnibus, you might say that, for the board, abundans cautela non nocet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zorrofan Posted October 23, 2013 Share Posted October 23, 2013 abundans cautela non nocet +1 :) cheers Zorro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
siddharth18 Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 Can anyone enlighten someone like me, who's not familiar with corporate governance laws/rules, with what happens if they agree to let him have two seats on the board? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parsad Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 Can anyone enlighten someone like me, who's not familiar with corporate governance laws/rules, with what happens if they agree to let him have two seats on the board? He'll possibly push his agenda as the largest shareholder until he possibly forces board members out. Either tow the line or you will be out. Cheers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now