Jump to content

INLOT.AT - Intralot


Packer16

Recommended Posts

The net debt in your source only includes debt and cash but not ST/LT securities or JVs.  These can be quite valuable.  For example the Greek JV is going to return 12m this year alone.  The total value for these according to the Q12015 balance sheet is 90.7m (42.5m (JVs) + 36.2m (ST/LT securities) + 12m (Greek JV dividend)). 

 

As to the minorities the distribution has ranged from 16m to 42m per year (avg 25m) since 2011.  In the year-end conference call management discussed a 20m figure as a typical year.  This equates to 10% to 13% of EBITDA if the expected 2015 EBITDA and the 20 to 25m range of distributions are used.  If a 10% number is subtracted from EBITDA and the MI not included in EV the resulting values are about the same.

 

Packer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 414
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Hey Packer,

 

you are right on the Securities and the JV. I agree that they should be taken into account when valuing the company, although it would be nice to have more transparency on what those securities really are (possibly their own bonds they bought back in the past 6 months?).

 

In terms of the minorities, although I agree with the basic numbers I am a little bit more wary in assigning them value at/around Eur 100 mln as you are assuming that the dividends are equal to the attributable EBITDA which I don’t completely agree with. I have tried calculating the exact amount of minorities EBITDA and it looks more like 25/30% of the total figure so if you have the time try to give a look at the annual report in 2014 to see if that looks correct to you (I surely hope that your figure is the right one).

 

Cheers

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Without knowing the specific revenues and profitability of each location it can be misleading to use averages.  I think using the total NI to MI is the best proxy for MI EBITDA as the financials show little difference between EBITDA and NI in the financials footnote.  These are pretty close to the dividends quoted above for 2013 and 2014.  You can be really conservative and use 45m for MI EBITDA and still end up with considerable upside.

 

Packer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whenever I look at this company, it looks cheap from a Group perspective but then it always appears to me that the minorities get a large share of that value.

 

Below is a rough analysis of the 2014 earnings with an estimated split of the subsidaries. Interestingly, the EBITDA of the subsidaries appears to be very close to the PBT but the annual report does not provide any further detail - if I am missing something, then please let me know. Assuming the EBITDA split is the same proportion as Total Income, the non-controlling EBITDA is about €59m.

 

Screen%20Shot%202015-06-24%20at%2016.30.06.png

 

Applying an EBITDA multiple of 6x, the minority value approx. €360m which is inline with ContrarianNick.

 

What confuses me is the profitability (or lack of) in the Group ex Subs which shows a loss before tax of €67m. In addition, this loss does not result in a tax credit but a charge due to some €25m of non-deductible expenses (€16m in 2013) and subsidiaries' losses for which deferred tax has not been recognised (another €23m). These figures seem quite large when the group is only making an operating profit of €37m. Are these charges one-off or is it something that needs to accounted for in the valuation of the business.

 

The Group ex Subs operating loss of €67m is after Depreciation and Amortisation charge of €87m and Interest of €72m. ContrarianNick has already pointed out that there is scope to reduce the interest charge.

 

Is the Depreciation and Amoritisation a true reflection of the ongoing costs of the business - €27m is Licences and €34m is machinery and equipment. Can anyone shed any light on what ongoing maintenance costs should be?

 

I want to like this investment so, hopefully, someone can point out what I am missing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the issue here is there are a lot of estimates without having the specific financials of the minorities (i.e. there are no consolidating financials).  The minorities peaked in 2014 and management has stated the numbers will be closer to 20 to 25m going forward, similar to history before 2014.  In addition, the proportionate estimates can be misleading because we don't know the relative sizes of the minorities and how they play out in the financials.  What we do know is the amount of earnings applicable to the minorities going forward of 20 to 25 million and taxes at lets say 7 to 8 million so EBITDA of 27 to 33 million. 

 

Packer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey Pdoak,

I can tell you that the maintenance capex for the business is around Eur 60mln (this of course does not include the renewal of licences when they come due, i.e. Italy in 2016/17 will cost an additional Eur 20mln in capex).

As for your other points, it certainly is difficult to understand the true earning power of the company ex-minorities, however, I urge you to also look at the cash generation which, at least in 2014, does not paint such a grim picture. Having said that, even if you value the minorities at 6x EV/EBITDA, the upsides from here are still pretty high so, while this theme is to be kept under control, it should not ruin the buy case excessively.

 

cheers

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Packer, ContrarianNick - thanks for the response - its very helpful.

 

Packer, Do you know what is changing going forward so that the minorities are going to reduce their share from a Total Income of €45.9m to an EBITDA of €20-25m.

 

ContrarianNick, If maintenance capex is around €60m and amortisation of licences is about €27m then an ongoing maintenance capex including amortisation of licences of just under €90m would seem reasonable. Do you agree? I am trying to get to an "owner earnings" figure.

 

PDoak

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey Pdoak,

 

unfortunately is not that easy to calculate the MCX with licences as not all of the foreign operations actually require the payment of one and the terms can vary extensively. If you really want to be conservative I guess you could add 10/15 mln to the 60 mln MCX but I would say that is probably too much (and I am a very conservative guy).

 

cheers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, Grexit per se would only be a strong incentive for management to list elsewhere in Europe and possibly create a rerating of the stock. Considering how little Greece weights on the group EBITDA there really is no answer as to why management has not done so earlier. In case of a Grexit the stock would probably collapse thus creating an even better buying opportunity for investor as management would be "forced" to do the most rational thing and  change the listing of the company. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 5 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Just wanted to do a little recap:

Q2 results were largely unimpressive mostly due to the lack of cash generation (WC and minorities dividends being the main culprits). Management confirmed guidance for the year on EBITDA (Eur 190 mln) and guided for better cash generation in H2 as Italian gaming tax on AWP is reabsorbed (we’ll see how that goes as other Italian companies are not that bullish on a resolution before year end). Company confirmed bond buybacks and alluded to an early call on the 2018 bond (which so far has been the best way to trade on the company).

CEO’s comments on greek listing issues are a definite positive and it could lead to a foreign listing in the upcoming months so, to some extent this has become a value story with a catalyst. We’ll see…

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wonder if anyone would like to acquire/merge with this one...

 

Just wanted to do a little recap:

Q2 results were largely unimpressive mostly due to the lack of cash generation (WC and minorities dividends being the main culprits). Management confirmed guidance for the year on EBITDA (Eur 190 mln) and guided for better cash generation in H2 as Italian gaming tax on AWP is reabsorbed (we’ll see how that goes as other Italian companies are not that bullish on a resolution before year end). Company confirmed bond buybacks and alluded to an early call on the 2018 bond (which so far has been the best way to trade on the company).

CEO’s comments on greek listing issues are a definite positive and it could lead to a foreign listing in the upcoming months so, to some extent this has become a value story with a catalyst. We’ll see…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are likely going to see an intensification of M&A in Italy once the "Delega Fiscale" has been clarified by the government and when a further round of regulation has occurred (apparently the government is looking to have substitute AWPs with mini-VLTs), but this is not going to happen for a while (I'd say 12 months). However if you look at recent activity, there are certainly signs that players are increasingly looking at other local companies (Snai - Cogetech) and there has been a story about IGT-Sisal (unlikely in my opinion since it would make them the only runner-up for the Lotto license in 2016 and the government is not going to allow it). Given the small scope of Intralot operations in Italy, it wouldn't surprise me if they decided to sell their AWPs and exit from the country all together (I find it difficult to believe that they would try to buy market share given the level of debt and the high cost of capital that they are experiencing as of today). Also I would point out that during the last call, management explicitly stated that "it will be interesting to see what happens in Italy in the next 12 months in terms of M&A".

Finally, I would like to leave a suggestion to whom might be interested in other ideas in the gaming sector: have a look at Snai (local italian player) and IGT (international player).

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Interesting comments Nick, thank you. Do you own either IGT or Snai? Both seem to be trading close to 52-week lows. Thank you for the heads up, I'll be looking into Snai.

 

Still holding in to Intralot for the most part but it is starting to become time to see one of those catalysts play out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Bought back some shares I sold above €1.65. Earnings on Friday. Anyone else still in this? Very quiet here but of course not much news.

 

I'm still in this. I was going to post that earnings were coming up because it's been so quiet, but I got busy. I'm not buying more - just hanging on to what I've got.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...