Jump to content

INLOT.AT - Intralot


Packer16

Recommended Posts

I still think 9x is a good target both Bally Technology and Multimedia Games are trading in excess of 9x EBITDA.  IGT was bought out at 7.4x and OPAP is trading at 7.6x.  The lottery automation companies are trading at 3.4x (Intralot) to 6.0x EBITDA (Rexnet).  Of two two, I like Gtech as it is less expensive has less debt and has better management than SGMS.  SGMS is controlled by Ron Perleman.  Gtech appears to have declined ever since they announced the IGT merger as they paid a multiple in excess of there own for Gtech.  The nice aspect of the lottery side of the business is the recession proof nature which is not being reflected in the stock prices.

 

Packer 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 414
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

you have to go to the announcements part.

 

Now, as to how to find the presentations, I have no idea.  The only way I've gotten them is via google, not their site.

 

This post helped me find it, thanks!

 

http://www.intralot.com/content/502/athex-announcements

 

then:

 

http://www.intralot.com/content/3158/conference-call-invitation-thursday-14th-august-2014

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone have more insights in the distribution of revenue over the years? Most growth seems to come from Sports betting (50% of revenue) that has the lowest margins by far, obviously helped by the World Cup as well.

AWP and VLT seems to grow nicely and I assume margins are slightly higher here? Does anyone know what average sector margins are and how Intralot relates to it?

I think I once saw a nice break up of all revenues and margins and evolution in a presentation but I can't seem to find it back. Hard enough company to understand without the difficult to navigate website.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I  continue to have problems with the understanding of the minorities.

 

The discrepancy between the profit attributable to the equity holders and the profit attributable to the minorities seems to grow over time.

 

On a basis of total enterprise value (incl. minorities) to EBITDA, the company is very cheap. However, I can't shake the impression that the minorities mainly own the best and profitable parts of the company and the equity holders mainly the losing parts of the company. And this difference seems to widen over time. The cash flows (dividend minorities vs. dividend parent) also seem to confirm this over the years.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On a basis of total enterprise value (incl. minorities) to EBITDA, the company is very cheap. However, I can't shake the impression that the minorities mainly own the best and profitable parts of the company and the equity holders mainly the losing parts of the company. And this difference seems to widen over time. The cash flows (dividend minorities vs. dividend parent) also seem to confirm this over the years.

 

Agreed! That is why I passed on this company

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The minorities are where most of the currency risk is (thus the large currency losses every quarter) so the other parts of the business are in more stable parts of the world.  Part of the thesis here is the company is in a good business that is consolidating.  Historically, the company has been the laggard in terms of performance and the plan is to improve performance.  However, given the pace of consolidation and the prices paid for comps such as Bally Technology and IGT, this company may be more of a near-term acquisition target than anything else.  If a strategic purchased them, the industry would be down one price competitive competitor and the value would be accretive as the current multiple for Intralot is so low (40% below the comps). 

 

The payments to minority interest holders has ranged from Euro29m to Euro16m per year for the last 4 years.  This YTD it is Euro18m.  I reduced the EBITDA by Euro30m amount to account for the CFs to the minorities.

 

Packer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just don't see when Intralot can show us huge FCF or very meaningful growth

 

The minorities are where most of the currency risk is (thus the large currency losses every quarter) so the other parts of the business are in more stable parts of the world.  Part of the thesis here is the company is in a good business that is consolidating.  Historically, the company has been the laggard in terms of performance and the plan is to improve performance.  However, given the pace of consolidation and the prices paid for comps such as Bally Technology and IGT, this company may be more of a near-term acquisition target than anything else.  If a strategic purchased them, the industry would be down one price competitive competitor and the value would be accretive as the current multiple for Intralot is so low (40% below the comps). 

 

The payments to minority interest holders has ranged from Euro29m to Euro16m per year for the last 4 years.  This YTD it is Euro18m.  I reduced the EBITDA by Euro30m amount to account for the CFs to the minorities.

 

Packer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the last of the remaining gaming/lottery companies not purchased by another firm.  MGAM just got purchased by CGA.  This should get interesting.

 

Packer

 

Interesting...

 

I have MGAM at 9.51x EBITDA at the current price and 10.51x with the $40.00 price target that is suggested in some articles. At 10.51x, I have Intralot at 7.88 euro (I have 4.61x EBITDA for Intralot), a 300+% increase. But MGAM is a WAAAY better business, and if I were spending my money to buy either company, I'd definitely pay more for MGAM. I'd have to think through what multiple I'd be indifferent to buying either -- not sure I'm really qualified to answer that question.

 

Unfortunately Intralot is a pretty bad company. Of the comps I've looked at, it's the worst. GTECH is probably the closest, but it's still a better company. GTECH is trading at 5.9x EBITDA right now, so I'd price Intralot lower than that. At 5.9x EBITDA, I have Intralot at 3.17 euro, which is 75% increase. 

 

Any comments from anyone? This seems somewhat inline with what Packer described in the opening post.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what bothers me is lack of cash flow, together with this being a greek company (auditor is never really a fail save against this, just study other frauds). And one of management really reminded me of a greek george costanza in an interview :) :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYRnWGuRqG8. (skip to 2 minute mark lol)

 

It is growing, but still cash flow is lagging so far behind earnings. Also the very poor visibility. Still can't get my head exactly around minority interests. That seems like an incentive for fraud. And looking at their investments it doesn't look like they are really paying off very well. And most seem like crappy gambling websites with little traffic.

 

If you value this based on ev/ebitda you basicly hope for a buyout.

 

Also I have a little bit of experience with greeks now, and it seems they all try to fk you. So that probably biases me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what bothers me is lack of cash flow, together with this being a greek company (auditor is never really a fail save against this, just study other frauds). And one of management really reminded me of a greek george costanza in an interview :) :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYRnWGuRqG8. (skip to 2 minute mark lol)

 

It is growing, but still cash flow is lagging so far behind earnings. Also the very poor visibility. Still can't get my head exactly around minority interests. That seems like an incentive for fraud. And looking at their investments it doesn't look like they are really paying off very well. And most seem like crappy gambling websites with little traffic.

 

If you value this based on ev/ebitda you basicly hope for a buyout.

 

Also I have a little bit of experience with greeks now, and it seems they all try to fk you. So that probably biases me.

 

Heh, I think if they were trying to "fk" investors by way of auditors, the business would probably look a little better :) It's a crap business, but there is a business running there. I'd imagine there's a lot of low hanging fruit that if cleaned up would make some money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The business is making money.  Just not as much as it should.  I think the business they are in is fine but the management is not so hot.  This is typically the case where an acquirer can buy and realize synergies by running the business properly. 

 

The whole lottery space is pretty cheap.  GTech is probably the highest quality name that sells at a discount from history.  If this business is too ich for you then I think Gtech is another name but has less upside.

 

Packer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some former employees of Intralot say it's possible for Intralot employees to manipulate the Dutch lottery. There is complete access to the file with lottery numbers, and those numbers can be changed or removed by employees without a trace.

 

http://www.demorgen.be/dm/nl/990/Buitenland/article/detail/2056843/2014/09/20/Nederland-in-rep-en-roer-is-er-gesjoemeld-met-loterij.dhtml

 

(sorry, it's in dutch)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...