Just thinking out loud:
I know that what matters is the underlying business, IV, stock price doesn't matter, etc.. But at some point the stock price matters, because that's how you realize value in the end.
So does it bother any ALS shareholders that the stock has basically been flat just above $10/share for 10+ years (with that big spike and then crash around 2007-2008 cancelling each other out)?
If IV has been building at a high rate during all that time, doesn't it mean that those who bought around $10 in the past massively overpaid? Or was it undervalued then (when the company was doing buybacks) and it's just much more undervalued now? Or did maybe the IV not go up quite that much during that time (commodity cycle impact, China cycle didn't last as long as expected, etc?)? Why is the market unwilling to assign much more than C$10/share to ALS? Just Mr. Market being crazy or maybe this business model is tougher than initially thought?
I'm not saying I know, I've just always found it interesting that apparently nothing can unstick this stock for $10-12 even over what most would consider a decently long period.